浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.北京大学第三医院 北京 100191
2.浙江诺尔康神经电子科技股份有限公司 杭州 311100
王宇 博士 副主任医师;研究方向:耳科学与听力学的基础和临床研究
林以鹏 博士;研究方向:人工耳蜗的调试和应用效果研究
潘滔,E-mail: pantao6422@163.com
高珊仙,E-mail: gaosx@nurotron.com
收稿日期:2024-03-23,
纸质出版日期:2024-07-15
移动端阅览
王宇,林以鹏,鲁兆毅等.人工耳蜗植入术后电诱发听性脑干反应的电生理特征与参数优化研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(04):346-350.
WANG Yu,LIN Yi-peng,LU Zhao-yi,et al.Electrophysiological Characteristics and Parameter Optimization of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses after Cochlear Implantation[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(04):346-350.
王宇,林以鹏,鲁兆毅等.人工耳蜗植入术后电诱发听性脑干反应的电生理特征与参数优化研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(04):346-350. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.04.004.
WANG Yu,LIN Yi-peng,LU Zhao-yi,et al.Electrophysiological Characteristics and Parameter Optimization of Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses after Cochlear Implantation[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(04):346-350. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.04.004.
目的
2
研究不同测试参数对电诱发听性脑干反应(electrical auditory brainstem response,EABR)波形的影响,选择优化的人工耳蜗术后EABR测试参数,探讨EABR与人工耳蜗术后行为测试结果之间的关系。
方法
2
选取17名人工耳蜗植入者,记录和分析不同刺激电极位置、脉冲间隔和交替/非交替双相脉冲电流下EABR波V的引出率、阈值和潜伏期等特征,分析不同刺激电极位置下EABR阈值与行为学T、C值的相关性。
结果
2
①蜗顶处EABR的V波阈值(90.58±27.39 CU)显著小于蜗中处(106.98±15.66 CU);②蜗顶处的V波潜伏期(4.47±0.357 ms)显著短于蜗中处(4.72±0.335 ms);③采用交替双相脉冲电流的电伪迹幅值(9.40±12.35 μV)显著小于非交替脉冲(19.49±15.12 μV);④蜗顶处EABR阈值与行为测试的T值和C值均有显著相关性。
结论
2
EABR的刺激电极位置和脉冲电流类型均影响波形结果,蜗顶电刺激比蜗中更易引出理想的EABR波形,使用交替双相脉冲电流刺激可有效减少电伪迹的影响。EABR阈值可为人工耳蜗术后开机和调试提供参考。
Objective
2
This study aimed to investigate the effects of different test parameters on the waveforms of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABR)
to select the optimized EABR test parameters after cochlear implantation
and to explore the relationship between EABR and behavioral test results after cochlear implantation.
Methods
2
The study included 17 Nurotron cochlear implant recipients. The characteristics of the EABR
such as the occurrence rate
threshold
and latency of wave V
were recorded and analyzed for stimulation at different electrode positions
pulse intervals
and alternating/non-alternating biphasic pulse currents. The correlation between EABR threshold and behavioral T and C values at different electrode positions was also analyzed.
Results
2
The threshold of EABR wave V at the apex of the cochlea (90.58±27.39 CU) was significantly lower than that at the middle turn (106.98±15.66 CU). The latency of wave V at the apex of the cochlea (4.47±0.357 ms) was significantly shorter than that at the middle turn (4.72±0.335 ms). The amplitude of the electrical artifact using alternating biphasic pulse current (9.40±12.35 μV) was significantly smaller than that using non-alternating pulse (19.49±15.12μV). The threshold of EABR at the apex of the cochlea was significantly correlated with the T value and C value of the behavioral test.
Conclusion
2
The stimulation electrode position and pulse current type both affect the waveforms of EABR. The apex stimulation is more likely to evoke the ideal EABR waveforms than the middle turn
and the use of alternating biphasic pulse current stimulation can effectively reduce the impact of electrical artifacts. The EABR threshold can provide a reference for the activation and mapping after cochlear implantation.
Starr A , Brackmann DE . Brain stem potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlea in human subjects [J ] . Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol , 1979 , 88 ( 4 Pt 1 ): 550 - 556 .
唐鸣 , 张盼盼 , 邓红霞 , 等 . 人工耳蜗植入者EABR和行为测听电流级阈值相关性研究 [J ] . 中华耳科学杂志 , 2020 , 18 ( 3 ): 475 - 480 .
楼高忠 , 郑海昌 , 王钰 , 等 . 人工耳蜗植入者电诱发听性脑干反应阈值与行为测听阈值相关性研究 [J ] . 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科 , 2020 , 27 ( 4 ): 216 - 218 .
Wang Y , Pan T , Deshpande SB , et al . The Relationship Between EABR and Auditory Performance and Speech Intelligibility Outcomes in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients [J ] . Am J Audiol , 2015 , 24 ( 2 ): 226 - 234 .
王宇 , 潘滔 , 马芙蓉 . 电诱发听性脑干反应在人工耳蜗植入中的应用进展 [J ] . 中华耳科学杂志 , 2015 , 13 ( 3 ): 469 - 475 .
Gibson WP , Sanli H , Psarros C . The use of intra-operative electrical auditory brainstem responses to predict the speech perception outcome after cochlear implantation [J ] . Cochlear Implants Int , 2009 , 10 ( Suppl 1 ): 53 - 57 .
程靖宁 , 曹克利 , 李原 , 等 . 人工耳蜗植入前电诱发听性脑干反应测试的临床应用 [J ] . 听力学及言语疾病杂志 , 2008 , 16 ( 3 ): 193 - 196 .
金毅 . 人工耳蜗植入前EABR检测参数的优化及临床应用 [D ] . 北京协和医学院中国医学科学院 , 2013 .
Kileny PR , Miller JM , Kemink JL , et al . Prediction of auditory nerve survival in humans using the electrical auditory brainstem response [J ] . Am J Otol , 1992 , 13 ( 4 ): 381 - 382 .
Kubo T , Yamamoto K , Iwaki T , et al . Significance of auditory evoked responses (EABR and P300) in cochlear implant subjects [J ] . Acta Otolaryngol , 2001 , 121 ( 2 ): 257 - 261 .
Allum JH , Shallop JK , Hotz M , et al . Characteristics of electrically evoked 'auditory' brainstem responses elicited with the nucleus 22-electrode intracochlear implant [J ] . Scand Audiol , 1990 , 19 ( 4 ): 263 - 267 .
Shallop JK , Beiter AL , Goin DW , et al . Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant [J ] . Ear Hear , 1990 , 11 ( 1 ): 5 - 15 .
Firszt JB , Chambers RD , Kraus , et al . Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response [J ] . Ear and hearing , 2002 , 23 : 502 - 15 .
Guiraud J , Gallego S , Arnold L , et al . Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses [J ] . Hear Res , 2007 , 223 ( 1-2 ): 48 - 60 .
Brown CJ , Abbas PJ , Fryauf-bertschy H , et al . Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses in nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process [J ] . Ear Hear , 1994 , 15 ( 2 ): 168 - 176 .
王宇 , 潘滔 , 周娜 , 等 . 电诱发听性脑干反应的电生理特征及其在人工耳蜗植入中的评估价值 [J ] . 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志 , 2013 , 27 ( 1 ): 8 - 12 .
0
浏览量
16
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构