1.广州中医药大学第二临床医学院 广州 510405
2.广东省中医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科 广州 510120
黄萌 在读硕士;研究方向:咽喉嗓音疾病
陈文勇,E-mail:wenyongch@163.com
收稿:2026-01-29,
修回:2026-03-11,
录用:2026-04-19,
纸质出版:2026-09-15
移动端阅览
黄萌,陈文勇.咽喉反流与声带病变的相关性及其嗓音声学分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2026,24(05):496-500.
HUANG Meng,CHEN Wen-yong.The Correlation between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Vocal Cord Lesions and Their Acoustic Analysis of Voice[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2026,24(05):496-500.
黄萌,陈文勇.咽喉反流与声带病变的相关性及其嗓音声学分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2026,24(05):496-500. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2026.05.009.
HUANG Meng,CHEN Wen-yong.The Correlation between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Vocal Cord Lesions and Their Acoustic Analysis of Voice[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2026,24(05):496-500. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2026.05.009.
目的
2
探讨咽喉反流(laryngopharyngeal reflux,LPR)在不同性质声带病变(慢性炎症、良性占位、癌前病变)中的患病率差异,分析LPR对嗓音障碍患者声学功能的影响。
方法
2
纳入533例嗓音障碍患者,依据临床诊断分为炎症组(n=222)、良性组(包括息肉、小结、囊肿、任克水肿、肉芽肿,n=250)及癌前组(声带白斑,n=61)。采用反流症状指数量表(reflux symptom index,RSI)和反流体征评分量表(reflux finding score,RFS)评估LPR情况,应用嗓音分析软件检测记录基频(F
0
)、基频微扰(jitter)、振幅微扰(shimmer)、最长发声时间(maximum phonation time,MPT)等声学参数及嗓音障碍严重指数(dysphonia severity index,DSI),比较组间及LPR亚组间的差异。
结果
2
LPR总患病率50.09%(267/533),在3组间呈显著递增趋势,炎症组36.94%(82/222)、良性组58.00%(145/250)、癌前组65.57%(40/61)(
P
<
0.001)。嗓音声学分析显示,良性组、癌前组的jitter、shimmer显著高于炎症组,而DSI、MPT显著降低(
P
<
0.05)。亚组分析发现,与非LPR相比,良性组、癌前组中LPR阳性者的嗓音损害更严重,两组DSI显著降低,良性组LPR阳性患者jitter、shimmer升高,癌前组LPR阳性患者jitter、shimmer升高,MPT降低,差异具有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
LPR与声带占位性病变的发生发展密切相关,其患病率随病变性质的进展显著升高。良性占位病变、癌前病变患者表现为明确的嗓音功能叠加损害,LPR是影响嗓音康复预后的关键可控因素。因此,应对所有嗓音障碍患者进行LPR筛查、嗓音声学检测随访,并对声带良性及癌前病变患者实施针对性LPR评估与管理,以优化嗓音治疗预后。
Objective
2
To investigate the prevalence differences of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in different types of vocal cord lesions (chronic inflammation
benign lesions
precancerous lesions) and analyze the impact of LPR on acoustic function in patients with voice disorders.
Methods
2
A total of 533 patients with voice disorders wer
e enrolled and classified into three groups based on clinical diagnosis: inflammatory group (n=222)
benign group (including polyps
nodules
cysts
Riecked's edema
and granulomas
n=250)
and precancerous group (vocal cord leukoplakia
n=61). LPR was assessed using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Acoustic parameters
including fundamental frequency (F
0
)
Jitter
Shimmer
maximum phonation time (MPT)
and dysphonia severity index (DSI)
were recorded and analyzed using voice analysis software. Differences among groups and within LPR subgroups were compared.
Results
2
The overall prevalence of LPR was 50.09% (267/533)
showing a significant increasing trend across the three groups: inflammatory group (36.94%
82/222)
benign group (58.00%
145/250)
and precancerous group (65.57%
40/61)
with statistically significant differences (
P
<
0.001). Acoustic analysis revealed that the Jitter and Shimmer in the benign and precancerous groups were significantly higher than those in the inflammatory group
while the DSI and MPT was significantly reduced (
P
<
0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that compared with non-LPR cases
LPR-positive individuals in the benign and precancerous groups exhibited more severe vocal impairment
with significantly reduced DSI in both groups. LPR-positive patients in the benign group showed increased Jitter and Shimmer
while those in the precancerous group exhibited elevated Jitter and Shimmer accompanied by reduced MPT
with statistically significant differences (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
LPR is closely associated with the occurrence and progression of vocal cord lesions
with its prevalence markedly increasing as the lesion nature advances. Patients with vocal cord benign lesions and precancerous lesions demonstrate clear superimposed vocal function impairments
where LPR serves as a key controllable factor influencing vocal recovery prognosis. Therefore
all patients with vocal disorders should undergo LPR screening and acoustic vocal assessment follow-up. Targeted LPR evaluation and management should be implemented for patients with vocal cord benign and precancerous lesions to optimize vocal therapy outcomes.
中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会咽喉组 , 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会咽喉学组 , 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会嗓音学组 . 咽喉反流性疾病诊断与治疗专家共识[J](2022年,修订版) . 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志 , 2022 , 57 ( 10 ): 1149 - 1172 .
Spantideas N , Drosou E , Karatsis A , et al . Voice disorders in the general Greek population and in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux: Prevalence and risk factors [J ] . J Voice , 2015 , 29 ( 3 ): 389.e27 - 389.e32 .
彭雨婷 , 徐丹 , 刘雪莱 , 等 . 重庆地区耳鼻咽喉头颈外科门诊咽喉反流性疾病的流行病学调查 [J ] . 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志 , 2021 , 35 ( 4 ): 351 - 354,359 .
王宇光 , 郭玉红 , 李超凡 , 等 . 耳鼻咽喉科住院患者咽喉反流患病率及危险因素调查研究 [J ] . 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志 , 2020 , 34 ( 1 ): 33 - 35 .
Guo W , Zhang J , Yue H , et al . The reflux symptom score has good screening value for laryngopharyngeal reflux [J ] . BMC Gastroenterol , 2024 , 24 ( 1 ): 346 - 346 .
Chugh R . The role of empirical treatment with proton pump inhibitor as a diagnostic tool in laryngopharyngeal reflux [J ] . Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg , 2022 , 74 ( Suppl 2 ): 1744 - 1751 .
Zhang B , Nie Q , Zhang S , et al . Comparative evaluation of RSI, RSS, RFS, and RSA for screening laryngopharyngeal reflux [J ] . J Voice , 2025 , 2 : S0892-1997(25)00496 - 5 .
华杜鹃 , 屈季宁 , 周涛 . 反流症状指数量表和反流体征指数量表在喉咽反流性疾病诊断中的应用研究 [J ] . 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科 , 2013 , 20 ( 3 ): 144 - 146 .
严森 , 徐文 , 李赟 , 等 . 咽喉反流与嗓音疾病的相关分析 [J ] . 听力学及言语疾病杂志 , 2014 , 22 ( 1 ): 34 - 38 .
王磊 , 王刚 , 孙喆喆 , 等 . 咽喉反流与声带良性增生性病变、声带白斑、慢性咽喉炎相关性研究 [J ] . 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 , 2024 , 38 ( 6 ): 71 - 77 .
郑念东 , 刘江涛 , 姜琳琳 , 等 . 咽喉反流与咽喉常见疾病的关系及其相关危险因素分析 [J ] . 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科 , 2024 , 31 ( 1 ): 45 - 48 .
刘红丹 , 孙喆喆 , 王刚 , 等 . 声带白斑与声带息肉患者合并咽喉反流性疾病的研究 [J ] . 当代护士(中旬刊) , 2023 , 30 ( 7 ): 63 - 66 .
Lechien JR , Finck C , Costa de Araujo P , et al . Voice outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: a systematic review of 1483 patients [J ] . Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol , 2017 , 274 ( 1 ): 1 - 23 .
刘倩 , 吕颜露 . 咽喉反流通过NF-κB信号通路介导炎症反应对声带黏膜的影响 [J ] . 华中科技大学学报(医学版) , 2019 , 48 ( 1 ): 32 - 37 .
Liu D , Qian T , Sun S , et al . Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Inflammatory Responses in Mucosal Barrier Dysfunction of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract [J ] . J Inflamm Res , 2021 , 13 : 1291 - 1304 .
Lechien JR , Saussez S , Nacci A , et al . Association between laryngopharyngeal reflux and benign vocal folds lesions: A systematic review [J ] . Laryngoscope , 2019 , 129 ( 9 ): E329 - E341 .
Parsel SM , Wu EL , Riley CA , et al . Gastroesophageal and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Associated With Laryngeal Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J ] . Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol , 2019 , 17 ( 7 ): 1253 - 1264.e5 .
常淼 , 李育军 , 张森 , 等 . 嗓音障碍患者各参数得分评估与咽喉反流分析 [J ] . 中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志 , 2023 , 23 ( 1 ): 39 - 43 .
曹媛 , 张奇雪 , 阮宏莹 , 等 . 声带占位病变患者多维嗓音声学分析及发声空气动力学检测比较 [J ] . 听力学及言语疾病杂志 , 2019 , 27 ( 3 ): 280 - 284 .
吕倩 , 彭鑫 , 王晓雨 , 等 . 嗓音声学检测对喉白斑患者嗓音评估的临床价值 [J ] . 天津医药 , 2014 , 42 ( 12 ): 1226 - 1229 .
张帆 , 姚利 , 彭一纯 , 等 . 嗓音障碍严重指数在咽喉反流相关嗓音疾病中的应用研究 [J ] . 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志 , 2017 , 31 ( 22 ): 1745 - 1748 .
Moser N , Borbély Y . The voice of reflux: A systematic review about acoustic voice analysis in reflux patients [J ] . iScience , 2025 , 28 ( 10 ): 113468 .
刘梓琪 , 黄佳丽 , 汪李琴 , 等 . 窄带成像内镜联合嗓音声学分析在声带白斑鉴别诊断中的价值 [J ] . 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 , 2025 , 39 ( 6 ): 87 - 96 .
闫燕 , 万苡辰 , 刘庆松 , 等 . 两种方法诊断咽喉反流患者的嗓音特征及治疗前后变化 [J ] . 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科 , 2015 , 22 ( 9 ): 442 - 444 .
张丽卫 . 声带良性增生性病变患者手术前后嗓音学参数的变化情况分析 [J ] . 中国当代医药 , 2019 , 26 ( 23 ): 83 - 85,92 .
Ma EP , Cheung YC , Siu AK , et al . The Effectiveness of Vocal Hygiene Education With Resonant Voice Therapy for School-Aged Children With Vocal Nodules [J ] . J Voice , 2024 , 38 ( 2 ): 538.e23 - 538.e30 .
Xu X , Huang X , Tan J , et al . The Effects of Hard Voice Onset on Objective Voice Function in Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux [J ] . J Voice , 2024 , 38 ( 5 ): 1256.e9 - 1256.e15 .
Cui N , Dai T , Liu Y , et al . Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: Updated examination of mechanisms, pathophysiology, treatment, and association with gastroesophageal reflux disease [J ] . World J Gastroenterol , 2024 , 30 ( 16 ): 2209 - 2219 .
傅洋洋 , 佘翠平 , 张悦 , 等 . 反流性咽喉疾病合并声带息肉患者实施声带息肉手术联合抗酸治疗的效果分析 [J ] . 中国实用药 , 2022 , 17 ( 5 ): 150 - 153 .
姚新 , 李宁 . 抑酸治疗改善声带白斑术后患者咽喉反流的效果及对相关声学参数及复发的影响 [J ] . 医学理论与实践 , 2022 , 35 ( 17 ): 2958 - 2960 .
Parker NP . Vocal fold leukoplakia: incidence, management, and prevention [J ] . Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg , 2017 , 25 ( 6 ): 464 - 468 .
0
浏览量
5
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010502052338