口腔运动功能联合语言康复训练对语言障碍患者的效果

黄静芳; 王志英; 刘帆; 候珊珊

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

口腔运动功能联合语言康复训练对语言障碍患者的效果

康复教育 | 更新时间：2026-10-28

- 口腔运动功能联合语言康复训练对语言障碍患者的效果
- The Effect of Oral Motor Function Combined with Speech Rehabilitation Training on Patients with Articulation Disorders
- 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 2022年20卷第6期页码：448-450+468
- 作者机构：
  
  湖南省郴州市第一人民医院
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  中图分类号： R767.92;R493
- 纸质出版：2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
黄静芳, 王志英, 刘帆, 等. 口腔运动功能联合语言康复训练对语言障碍患者的效果[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2022,20(6):448-450+468.

黄静芳, 王志英, 刘帆, et al. The Effect of Oral Motor Function Combined with Speech Rehabilitation Training on Patients with Articulation Disorders[J]. 2022, 20(6): 448-450+468.
黄静芳, 王志英, 刘帆, 等. 口腔运动功能联合语言康复训练对语言障碍患者的效果[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2022,20(6):448-450+468. DOI：

黄静芳, 王志英, 刘帆, et al. The Effect of Oral Motor Function Combined with Speech Rehabilitation Training on Patients with Articulation Disorders[J]. 2022, 20(6): 448-450+468. DOI：

摘要

目的探讨口腔运动功能联合语言康复训练对语音障碍患者的效果。方法选择2020年12月～2021年8月我院收治的84例语音障碍患者，依据治疗方式分为观察组（口腔运动功能联合语言康复训练）39人和对照组（语言康复训练）45人。分析两组治疗前后语音清晰度、口腔运动功能、吹气、鼓气、最长发声时间、喉镜检查指标及嗓音障碍指数量表（voice handicap index

VHI）评分。结果治疗后观察组语音清晰度较治疗前提高且显著优于对照组（P<0.05）；治疗后观察组舌部、下颌部、唇部功能评分及总评分均显著高于对照组（P<0.05）；观察组吹气、鼓气时间及最长发声时间增长幅度均显著高于对照组（P<0.05）；观察组喉镜检查指标（黏膜波检测值、周期性检测值、声带闭合检测值、对称性检测值）及VHI评分均显著低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论口腔运动功能联合语言康复训练是治疗语音障碍的有效方法，能在一定程度上提高患者的语音清晰度及口腔运动功能，有利于减轻语音障碍对患者生活造成的不良影响并改善发声功能。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of oral motor function combined with speech rehabilitation training on patients with articulation disorders. Methods 84 patients with articulation disorders admitted to our hospital from December 2020 to August 2021 were selected and divided into the observation group（oral motor function combined with speech rehabilitation training

n=39）and the control group（speech rehabilitation training

n=45） according to treatment methods. The differences of articulation and oral motor function between the two groups before and after treatment were analyzed

and the blowing

inflating and the longest vocalizing time between the two groups were counted. The laryngoscopy indexes and Voice Handicap Index（VHI） scores were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results The articulation of speech in the observation group was improved after treatment

and the degree of improvement was better than that in the control group（P<0.05）. The functional scores and total scores of tongue

mandibular and lip in the observation group were higher than those in the control group after treatment（P<0.05）. The laryngeal examination indexes（mucosal wave detection value

periodic detection value

vocal cord closure detection value

symmetry detection value）

and VHI score in the observation group were lower than those in the control group after treatment（P<0.05）.Conclusion Oral motor function combined with speech rehabilitation training is an effective method for the treatment of patients with articulation disorders

which can improve the articulation and oral motor function of patients to a certain extent

and also help to reduce the adverse impact of voice on patients’ life and improve the vocal function

with superior therapeutic effect.

关键词

Keywords

references

Namasivayam Aravind Kumar,Coleman Deirdre,O'Dwyer Aisling,van Lieshout Pascal.Speech Sound Disorders in Children: An Articulatory Phonology Perspective.[J].Frontiers in psychology,2019.

Eadie Patricia,Morgan Angela,Ukoumunne Obioha C,Ttofari Eecen Kyriaki,Wake Melissa,Reilly Sheena.Speech sound disorder at 4 years: prevalence, comorbidities, and predictors in a community cohort of children.[J].Developmental medicine and child neurology,2015.

McLaughlin Maura R.Speech and language delay in children.[J].American family physician,2011.

Wheeler Karen M,Collins Savita P,Sapienza Christine M.The relationship between VHI scores and specific acoustic measures of mildly disordered voice production.[J].Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation,2006.

Dorothy V.M. Bishop,Barbara Clarkson.Written Language as a Window in to Residual Language Deficits: A Study of Children With Persistent and Residual Speech and Language Impairments[J].Cortex,2003.

Stern L M,Connell T M,Lee M,Greenwood G.The Adelaide preschool language unit: results of follow-up.[J].Journal of paediatrics and child health,1995.

赵瑾珠,李锦卉,吴丹丹,颜田,唐丽娜,何天祎,熊婷婷,郝燕.儿童语言障碍相关术语的历史演变和临床实践[J].教育生物学杂志,2022(04).

孙定炯,张光彩,雷贝贝.通关利窍针法联合口腔功能训练对卒中后失语症患者失语症程度及语言功能恢复的干预作用[J].陕西中医,2020(10).

刘雪曼.儿童语言障碍与语言评估[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2019(03).

徐丽娜,李峰,胡明芳,高楠,吕自愿.功能性构音障碍患者侧化构音的语音特点及康复训练[J].中国康复理论与实践,2016(05).

徐亚琴,梁沂,胡小沙,池霞,郭锡熔,童梅玲.儿童功能性构音障碍21个词首辅音的临床特征分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2015(05).

梁卫兰.儿童言语和语言障碍的诊断与治疗[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011(10).

李红艳,徐文,胡蓉,张丽,韩德民.嗓音障碍指数量表简化中文版的研究[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2010(06).

XU Wen,LI Hong-yan,HU Rong,HU Hui-ying,HOU Li-zhen,ZHANG Li,ZHUANG Pei-yun,HAN De-min.嗓音障碍指数量表中文版信度和效度评价[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2008(09).

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于多主体协同视角的人工智能支持孤独症谱系障碍儿童教育干预的实践挑战与优化路径

标准化病人教学法在听力技师考核中的应用

咽喉反流与声带病变的相关性及其嗓音声学分析

乙状窦源性耳鸣机制与诊疗研究进展

儿童言语失用症研究进展