宜宾市第六人民医院眼耳鼻喉科
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
闫波. 听觉康复训练对语后聋人工耳蜗植入患者的干预效果[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2022,20(4):302-304.
闫波. The Intervention Effect of Auditory Rehabilitation Training on Postlingual Deaf Patients with CI[J]. 2022, 20(4): 302-304.
目的 分析听觉康复训练对语后聋人工耳蜗植入(CI)患者的干预效果。方法 选取2020年1月~2021年1月医院CI术后72例语后聋成年患者,随机分为对照组和研究组各36例,对照组无干预,研究组接受为期半年的听觉康复训练,内容有简单分类、理解综合和实际应用训练。比较干预前后两组患者语言识别能力、沟通能力、听觉能力、交流恐惧状况。结果 干预前两组患者的语言识别能力、普通话噪声下言语测试(mandcirin heating in noise test
MHZNT)和交流恐惧自陈量表(personal report of communicationapprehension
PRCA-24)评分均无统计学意义(P>0.05)
干预后研究组的语言识别能力、沟通能力较对照组有显著差异(P<0.05)
MHINT分值显著高于对照组,PRCA-24评分显著低于对照组。结论 听觉康复训练对语后聋CI患者的干预效果较理想,可提高其语言和听觉能力,降低交流恐惧,利于其生活质量的提高。
Objective To analyze the intervention effect of auditory rehabilitation training on postlingual deaf patients with cochlear implants(CI). Methods From January 2020 to January 2021
72 adult patients with post lingual deafness after hospital CI were selected for study. They were randomly divided into control group and study group(36 cases in each group). The control group had no intervention. The study group received auditory rehabilitation training for half a year
including simple classification
understanding and practical application. The language recognition ability
communication ability
hearing ability and communication fear were compared before and after the intervention. Results Before the intervention
there was no significant difference in language recognition ability
MHZNT and PRCA-24 scores between the two groups(P>0.05). After the intervention
the language recognition ability and communication ability of the study group were significantly different from those of the control group(P<0.05)
the MHINT score was significantly higher than that of the control group
and the PRCA-24 score was significantly lower than that of the control group. Conclusion The intervention effect of auditory rehabilitation training on CI patients with post lingual deafness is ideal. It can improve their language and auditory ability
reduce communication fear
improve their quality of life.
Völter C,Schirmer C,Stöckmann C,Dazert S.[Computer-based auditory training for hearing rehabilitation of adult cochlear implant users].[J].HNO,2020.
Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, 13005 Marseille, France.,Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, 13005 Marseille, France.,Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Aix Marseille University, Inserm, INS, 13005 Marseille, France..Musical Training for Auditory Rehabilitation in Hearing Loss[J].Journal of Clinical Medicine,2020.
Stropahl Maren,Besser Jana,Launer Stefan.Auditory Training Supports Auditory Rehabilitation:A State-of-the-Art Review[J].Ear and Hearing,2019.
袁永一,戴朴.微创人工耳蜗植入手术策略[J].中华医学杂志,2021(02).
王燕,唐世雄,潘赟筠,陈爽,王耀文.成人语后聋长时间听觉剥夺后人工耳蜗植入的效果评估[J].现代实用医学,2020(08).
陈睿,郑会杰,张雨佳.语言康复训练对听力障碍儿童面部表情识别的影响[J].贵阳学院学报(社会科学版),2020(02).
郑梦梦,王凯,严降雨,郝文娟.不同年龄成人语后聋患者人工耳蜗植入的疗效研究[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2020(02).
冯帅,王菲,臧健,庞仕秀,姜学钧.成人语前聋和语后聋人工耳蜗植入效果分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2019(02).
庞仕秀,李巍,冯帅,王菲,姜学钧.语后聋患者人工耳蜗植入术后效果分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2018(06).
吴德祥,吴长松.人工耳蜗植入对儿童与成人耳聋患者言语康复效果比较——236例人工耳蜗植入疗效分析[J].大医生,2018(Z1).
钟梅,邱建新.双耳双模式人工耳蜗植入患者术后听觉能力评估[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2018(03).
高芬琦,王林娥.成人语后聋人工耳蜗植入的现状及研究进展[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2017(01).
孙雯,张华.成人人工耳蜗植入的言语评估[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2016(10).
0
浏览量
89
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010502052338