纸质出版:2021
移动端阅览
刘迪. 老年人突发性耳聋的临床特征及预后分析[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2021,19(5):357-360+367.
刘迪. The Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss[J]. 2021, 19(5): 357-360+367.
目的回顾性分析老年人突发性耳聋的临床资料
探讨其临床特征及预后情况。方法回顾性分析2016年1月~2020年12月经延边大学附属医院确诊并治疗的单侧发病的391例突发性耳聋患者临床资料
分为实验组159例及对照组232例。比较两组突发性耳聋患者的临床特征及预后情况。结果实验组和对照组患者有效率分别为38.4%、52.2%
具有显著差异(P<0.05);在基础疾病方面
实验组患者多患有基础疾病
两组间具有显著差异(P<0.05);在听力损失类型方面
实验组患者低频下降型较少
两组间具有显著差异义(P<0.05);在听力损失程度方面
实验组听力损失较重
两组间具有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论实验组治疗效果较差
可能与老年突发性耳聋患者低频下降型较少
其他类型较多
听力损失程度较重
多伴有高血压、糖尿病、腔隙性脑梗死等基础疾病有关。
Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognosis in elderly patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss(SSHL). Methods The clinical characteristics and prognosis in 391 cases with unilateral SSHL from Jan.
2016 to Dec.
2020 in Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University were analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the experimental group(159 cases) and the control group(232 cases). Results The total effective rates of the experimental group and the control group were 38.4% and 52.2% respectively
in which the difference was of statistical significance(P<0.05). In terms of systemic diseases
there were more patients with systemic diseases in the experimental group(P<0.05). In terms of the types of hearing loss
the elderly group had fewer low-frequency drop types
and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). In terms of the degree of hearing loss
more patients with severe hearing loss were found in the experimental group(P<0.05). Conclusion The treatment effect of the experimental group is poor
which may be related to the fact that the elderly patients with sudden deafness have less lowfrequency drop type
more other types
more severe hearing loss
and more basic diseases such as hypertension
diabetes
lacunar cerebral infarction.
Ban Jae-Ho,Jin Sung Min.A clinical analysis of psychogenic sudden deafness.[J].Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery,2006.
Vermeer Sarah E,Den Heijer Tom,Koudstaal Peter J,Oudkerk Matthijs,Hofman Albert,Breteler Monique M B.Incidence and risk factors of silent brain infarcts in the population-based Rotterdam Scan Study.[J].Stroke,2003.
Eisenman David,Arts H. Alexander.Effectiveness of Treatment for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss[J].Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2000.
Koji Hirano,Katsuhisa Ikeda,Tetsuaki Kawase,Takeshi Oshima,Seiji Kekehata,Shin Takahashi,Toshinori Sato,Toshimitsu Kobayashi,Tomonori Takasaka.Prognosis of sudden deafness with special reference to risk factors of microvascular pathology[J].Auris Nasus Larynx,1999(2).
杨安妮,李琦,李湘平.突发性聋预后研究进展[J].中华耳科学杂志,2021(02).
张慧,闫瑞红,李仲,王蕾,单子丽,代佳,李亚玲,耿曼英.纯音测听全频未引出的突发性耳聋临床特征及预后分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2020(06).
张永兰,程岩,徐开旭,林鹏,岳振忠,张桂敏,彭晓林.影响突发性聋近期疗效的相关因素分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2021(02).
付剑芬,傅江涛,林洪斌,沈川,丁卫东,陶静.老年突发性耳聋流行病学特征及发病相关影响因素和预防措施分析[J].中国预防医学杂志,2019(11).
王宇晴,刁明芳,田芳洁,丁意丽.低频与高频下降型突发性耳聋的临床症状和预后分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2019(04).
冰丹,兰兰,关静,王大勇,赵立东,谢林怡,王秋菊.年龄对突发性耳聋的预后影响[J].中华耳科学杂志,2018(03).
张智超.糖尿病年龄分布特点及发病年轻化相关因素研究[J].基层医学论坛,2018(10).
孙菲,周柯,林颖,高伟,温立婷,杨晓红,叶惠平,张田,喻国冻,查定军.影响突发性聋患者预后的因素与疗效相关性分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2018(02).
李秀诗,张琰,缪绯,刘芃,王秋实,刘映峰.高血压与随机血糖、年龄、性别的相关性分析[J].重庆医学,2017(28).
周长明,郑茜玲,杨川,张转,王翠翠,刘涛.176例突发性耳聋患者的临床特征分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2017(02).
余滋中,付艳乔,李国义.突发性耳聋老年患者临床特征及预后影响因素分析[J].解放军医药杂志,2017(01).
马鑫,古丽波斯坦·买买提艾力,静媛媛,余力生.突发性聋分型的再认识[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2016(14).
张洋,孙漫漫,秦兆冰.老年突发性聋患者临床特征及治疗效果分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2016(03).
徐真桂,吴修法,花锦超,薛源.伴有腔隙性脑梗死的突发性聋患者的临床分析[J].现代医学,2014(11).
王英歌,张榕,许元腾,陈国郝,林少莲,林有辉,叶胜难.不同年龄及不同类型突发性耳聋患者近期疗效观察[J].中华耳科学杂志,2012(03).
陈平,唐安洲,孙华,尹时华.老年人突发性聋合并腔隙性脑梗死[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2011(09).
周焕,白素娟,周玉贞,唐颖,冯会杰,杨扬.突发性聋预后相关因素分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2011(01).
侯志强,兰兰,王大勇,李倩,赵阳,吴子明,王秋菊.老年突发性耳聋的临床特征和转归[J].中华耳科学杂志,2010(02).
王丽妍,李慧军,姜琳琳,张蕾.特发性突聋预后影响因素分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2009(22).
秦兆冰.老年人突发性聋的临床特征[J].中华老年医学杂志,2003(02).
0
浏览量
404
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010502052338