1. 浙江中医药大学医学技术与信息工程学院,杭州,310000
2. 浙江省疾病预防控制中心
3. Auditory Research Laboratories,State University of New York
纸质出版:2022
移动端阅览
王曦, 赵乌兰, 徐飞, 等. 职业噪声暴露人群听力学特征分析[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2022,20(2):102-106+115.
王曦, 赵乌兰, 徐飞, et al. Audiological Characteristics of People Exposed to Occupational Noise[J]. 2022, 20(2): 102-106+115.
目的 探究职业噪声暴露人群的听力学特征
为早期噪声致隐性听力损失提供诊断意义。方法 选取37例有噪声暴露史的健听青年(接噪组
年龄28.70±0.76岁)和37例无噪声暴露史的健听男青年(对照组
年龄26.50±0.95岁)的优势耳进行扩展高频(extended high-frequency
EHF)、畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)、噪声下言语测听(speech in noise
SIN)、听性脑干反应(ABR)、言语声诱发听性脑干反应(speech evoked auditory brainstem responses
s-ABR)
比较对照组和接噪组各项测试结果的差异
并分析测试结果的相关性。结果 (1)在EHF测听中
随频率增高
接噪组较对照组检出率降低;接噪组在12.5、14、16、18、20 kHz频率处的平均听阈显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。(2)在DPOAE中
接噪组的信噪比较对照组降低;在4~10 kHz频率上有显著差异(P<0.05)。(3)在SIN测听中
接噪组的信噪比损失较对照组严重
差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(4)在clickABR中
接噪组的波Ⅰ幅值较对照组低
波Ⅰ的潜伏期较对照组延长
Ⅰ-Ⅴ的平均峰间间隔较对照组缩短
Ⅴ/Ⅰ波幅比值高于对照组(P<0.05)。(5)在s-ABR测试中
接噪组波A、C、D、O潜伏期较对照组显著延长(P<0.05)。(6)扩展高频阈值分别与DPOAE、s-ABR的C、O波潜伏期具有相关性;DPOAE与SIN信噪比损失存在相关性;ABR与s-ABR对辅音/d/的刺激反应存在相关性。结论 EHF、DPOAE、SIN、click-ABR和s-ABR等5种测试对于早期诊断噪声致隐性听力损失可能存在一定临床意义。
Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of possible noise-induced hearing loss by analyzing the audiological characteristics of people exposed to occupational noise. Methods Thirty-seven normal-hearing young adults with a history of noise exposure(noise-exposed group
aged 28.70±0.76 years) and thirty-seven normal-hearing young adults without a history of noise exposure(control group
aged 26.50±0.95 years) were recruited. The following five tests were conducted on each subject’s better ear to obtain audiological data: Extended high-frequency(EHF) audiometry(9-16 kHz)
Distortion product otoacoustic emissions(DPOAE)
Speech-in-noise(SIN) test
Auditory brainstem response(ABR)
and Speech-evoked auditory brainstem reponse(s-ABR). The differences in the test results between the control group and the noise-exposed group were compared. Results 1. In the EHF audiometry
the detection rates of the noise-exposed group were significantly(P<0.05) lower than that of the control group at the frequencies of 12.5-20 kHz. 2. In DPOAE
the extended high-frequency signal-to-noise ratio was lower than that in the control group; the differences at 4-10 kHz were statistically significant(P<0.05). 3. In the SIN test
the signal-to-noise ratio(SNR) loss in the noise-exposed group was significantly worse than that in the control group(P<0.05). 4. In the click-ABR
the amplitude of wave I in the noise-exposed group was lower than that in the control group
the latency of wave I was longer than that in the control group
mean Peak-to-Peak interval for I-V was shorter than that of the control group
and the V/I amplitude ratio of the noised-exposed group was higher than that of the control group
all with statistical significance(P<0.05). 5.In the s-ABR
the latencies of A
C
D
and O in the noise-exposed group were significantly longer than these in the control group.6. The extended high-frequency thresholds were correlated with DPOAE
and the latency of s-ABR wave C and O
respectively.DPOAE was correlated with SIN scores. Click-ABR was correlated with s-ABR’s response to the stimulus of consonant/d/.Conclusion The EHF
DPOAE
SIN
click-ABR
and s-ABR tests may have specific clinical significance for the early diagnosis of hidden hearing loss caused by noise.
符一飞.speech-ABR的影响因素与噪声下言语识别阈的相关性研究[D].中国人民解放军医学院,2016(03).
Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109.,MOE Key Laboratory of Model Animals for Disease Study, Model Animal Research Center of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210061, Jiangsu Province, China.,Institute for Brain Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210061, Jiangsu Province, China.,Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109.,Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109..Hidden Hearing Loss: A Disorder with Multiple Etiologies and Mechanisms.[J].Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine,2020.
Motlagh Zadeh Lina,Silbert Noah H,Sternasty Katherine,Swanepoel De Wet,Hunter Lisa L,Moore David R.Extended high-frequency hearing enhances speech perception in noise.[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2019.
National Acoustic Laboratories, Australian Hearing Hub, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Sydney, Australia,Department of Linguistics, Australian Hearing Hub, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Sydney, Australia,The HEARing CRC, 550 Swanston Street, Audiology, Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Melbourne, Australia,National Acoustic Laboratories, Australian Hearing Hub, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Sydney, Australia,The HEARing CRC, 550 Swanston Street, Audiology, Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Melbourne, Australia,National Acoustic Laboratories, Australian Hearing Hub, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Sydney, Australia,Department of Linguistics, Australian Hearing Hub, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Sydney, Australia,The HEARing CRC, 550 Swanston Street, Audiology, Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Melbourne, Australia,Department of Linguistics, Australian Hearing Hub, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Sydney, Australia,The HEARing CRC, 550 Swanston Street, Audiology, Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Melbourne, Australia,National Acoustic Laboratories, Australian Hearing Hub, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Sydney, Australia,The HEARing CRC, 550 Swanston Street, Audiology, Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Melbourne, Australia,National Acoustic Laboratories, Australian Hearing Hub, 16 University Avenue, Macquarie University, New South Wales, 2109, Sydney, Australia,The HEARing CRC, 550 Swanston Street, Audiology, Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Melbourne, Australia.Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility[J].Hearing Research,2018.
Noise-induced and age-related hearing loss: new perspectives and potential therapies[J].F1000Research,2017.
Fulbright Angela N C,Le Prell Colleen G,Griffiths Scott K,Lobarinas Edward.Effects of Recreational Noise on Threshold and Suprathreshold Measures of Auditory Function.[J].Seminars in hearing,2017.
Bramhall Naomi F,Konrad-Martin Dawn,McMillan Garnett P,Griest Susan E.Auditory Brainstem Response Altered in Humans With Noise Exposure Despite Normal Outer Hair Cell Function.[J].Ear and hearing,2017.
Salvi Richard,Sun Wei,Ding Dalian,Chen Guang-Di,Lobarinas Edward,Wang Jian,Radziwon Kelly,Auerbach Benjamin D.Inner Hair Cell Loss Disrupts Hearing and Cochlear Function Leading to Sensory Deprivation and Enhanced Central Auditory Gain.[J].Frontiers in neuroscience,2016.
Song Qiang,Shen Pei,Li Xiaowei,Shi Lijuan,Liu Lijie,Wang Jiping,Yu Zhiping,Stephen Kegan,Aiken Steve,Yin Shankai,Wang Jian.Coding deficits in hidden hearing loss induced by noise: the nature and impacts.[J].Scientific reports,2016.
Guoqiang Wan,Gabriel Corfas.No longer falling on deaf ears: Mechanisms of degeneration and regeneration of cochlear ribbon synapses[J].Hearing Research,2015.
Christopher J. Plack,Daphne Barker,Garreth Prendergast.Perceptual Consequences of “Hidden” Hearing Loss[J].Trends in Hearing,2014.
Furman Adam C,Kujawa Sharon G,Liberman M Charles.Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates.[J].Journal of neurophysiology,2013.
Bharath Chandrasekaran,Nina Kraus.The scalp‐recorded brainstem response to speech: Neural origins and plasticity[J].Psychophysiology,2010.
Hornickel Jane,Skoe Erika,Kraus Nina.Subcortical laterality of speech encoding.[J].Audiology & neuro-otology,2009.
Johnson Krista L,Nicol Trent G,Kraus Nina.Brain stem response to speech: a biological marker of auditory processing.[J].Ear and hearing,2005.
Stürzebecher E,Kevanishvili Z,Werbs M,Meyer E,Schmidt D.Interpeak intervals of auditory brainstem response, interaural differences in normal-hearing subjects and patients with sensorineural hearing loss.[J].Scandinavian audiology,1985(2).
王慧,时海波.噪声致听觉系统损害的研究进展[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2019(08).
武凯丽,赵乌兰,周静,蒋浩贤,张美辨,邱伟.噪声致隐性听力损失听力学特征[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2019(03).
刘浩强,赵立东.如何认识耳蜗内、外毛细胞之间的关系[J].中华耳科学杂志,2018(06).
李国庆,吕萍,王秋菊.隐性听力损失的发病机制及听力学表现[J].中华耳科学杂志,2017(02).
符一飞,郗昕,史伟,洪梦迪,陈艾婷,王倩.言语声诱发的听性脑干反应的性别差异性研究[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2015(22).
付欣,刘锦峰,王宁宇,李金兰,温晓慧,李晓婷,王彦君.健康更年期后女性的脑干言语编码能力分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2015(04).
熊浩,陈玲,杨海弟,李湘辉,邱泽恒,黄夏茵,郑亿庆.听力图正常耳鸣患者的隐匿性听力损失:耳鸣起源的启示[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2013(07).
0
浏览量
208
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010502052338