人工耳蜗植入儿童生活质量的差异及影响因素分析

赵子晨

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2025.03.016

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

人工耳蜗植入儿童生活质量的差异及影响因素分析

康复教育 | 更新时间：2025-05-12

- 人工耳蜗植入儿童生活质量的差异及影响因素分析
- Differences in Quality of Life Among Children with Cochlear Implants and Influencing Factors
- 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 2025年23卷第3期页码：294-297
- 作者机构：
  
  中国听力语言康复研究中心北京 100029
- 作者简介：
  
  赵子晨，硕士实习研究员；研究方向：言语语言康复, E-mail：1457605906@qq.com
- 基金信息：
  
  2023年北京市听力残疾人工耳蜗使用状况及满意度抽查项目
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2025.03.016
  中图分类号： R494
- 收稿日期：2024-06-30，
  
  纸质出版日期：2025-05-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
赵子晨.人工耳蜗植入儿童生活质量的差异及影响因素分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2025,23(03):294-297.

ZHAO Zi-chen.Differences in Quality of Life Among Children with Cochlear Implants and Influencing Factors[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2025,23(03):294-297.
赵子晨.人工耳蜗植入儿童生活质量的差异及影响因素分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2025,23(03):294-297. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2025.03.016.

ZHAO Zi-chen.Differences in Quality of Life Among Children with Cochlear Implants and Influencing Factors[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2025,23(03):294-297. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2025.03.016.

摘要

目的

评估人工耳蜗植入儿童的生活质量水平及差异，并分析其影响因素。

方法

从2023年北京市听力残疾人工耳蜗使用状况及满意度抽查项目中选取听力残疾儿童50名，采用人工耳蜗植入儿童家庭生活质量表（children using hearing implants quality of life，CuHIQoL）进行评估。采用

检验和方差分析研究人工耳蜗植入儿童的生活质量水平及不同性别、植入侧别、人工耳蜗使用时间（3年以内、3～6年、6年以上）、不同年龄分组（0～3岁组、3～6岁组、6岁以上组）儿童生活质量水平的差异。采用逐步回归分析逐步stepwise法探讨人工耳蜗植入儿童的年龄、植入侧别、确诊年龄、人工耳蜗使用时间、术后康复形式、康复内容、康复频率对其生活质量的影响。

结果

不同

年龄分组样本生活质量均呈显著差异（

0.05），其他因素未表现出显著差异（

0.05）。逐步回归分析模型为生活质量=2.738-0.108*年龄+0.159*康复频率。年龄对人工耳蜗植入儿童的生活质量产生显著的负向影响，康复频率对生活质量产生显著的正向影响。

结论

关注不同年龄段人工耳蜗植入儿童的生活质量，康复训练时要保证康复训练频率。

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the quality of life level as well as the variability in children after cochlear implant surgery. To analyze the factors influencing the quality of life of children after cochlear implant surgery.

Methods

The Family quality of life table of the implanted children (Children Using Hearing Implants Quality of Life

CuHIQoL) was used to evaluate the postoperative quality of life of 50 children with cochlear implants in Beijing. The t-test and variance analysis were used to study the quality of children's quality of life

different genders

cochlear implantation

cochlear use time (under 3 years

3～6 years and more than 6 years) and different ages (0-3 years old

3-6 years and 6 years old). Stestepwise regression analysis and stepwise stepwise method were used to explore the effects of ages

lateral sides

ages of confirmed hearing impairment

durations of cochlear use

forms of postoperative rehabilitation course

contents of postoperative rehabilitation course and frequency on their quality of life.

Results

All the samples of the different age groups showed significant values for quality of life (

0.05)

while none of the other samples showed significance (

0.05). The stepwise regression analysis model was: quality of life =2.738-0.108 * age + 0.159 * rehabilitation frequency. Ages had a significant negative effect on QoL

and rehabilitation frequency had a significant positive effect on QoL.

Conclusion

Pay attention to the quality of life of cochlear implant children of different ages after surgery

and ensure the frequency of rehabilitation training.

关键词

Keywords

references

Dazert S , Thomas JP , Loth A , et al . Cochlear implantation: Diagnosis, indications, and auditory rehabilitation results [J ] . Deutsches Ärzteblatt International , 2020 , 117 ( 41 ): 690 - 690 .

赵雅雯 , 刘海红 , 李颖 , 等 . 中文版"人工耳蜗植入儿童家长观点调查问卷"的建立与信度和效度研究 [J ] . 听力学及言语疾病杂志 , 2017 , 25 ( 2 ): 137 - 142 .

吴孟波 , 李欢 , 李少红 , 等 . 人工耳蜗植入术提高语前聋患者听觉言语能力及生活质量 [J ] . 中南大学学报(医学版) , 2021 , 46 ( 9 ): 989 - 994 .

Raat H , Botterweck AM , Landgraf JM , et al . Reliability and validity of the short form of the child health questionnaire for parents (CHQ-PF28) in large random school based and general population samples [J ] . J Epidemiol Community Health , 2005 , 59 ( 1 ): 75 - 82 .

Muller L , Goh BS , Cordovés AP , et al . Longitudinal outcomes for educational placement and quality of life in a prospectively recruited multinational cohort of children with cochlear implants [J ] . International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology , 2023 , 170 ( 7 ): 111583 .

Wu M , Li H , Li S , et al . Cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened patients: Evaluation in hearing, speech ability, and quality of life [J ] . Medical Sciences , 2021 , 46 ( 9 ): 989 - 995 .

Cesur S , Ciprut A , Terlemez S . Observational Study of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Two-year Follow-up Outcomes [J ] . Medeniyet Medical Journal , 2023 , 38 ( 1 ): 78 - 78 .

孙懿 , 邱建新 , 刘业海 , 等 . 人工耳蜗植入术后听力、言语及生活质量的评估 [J ] . 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志 , 2015 , 29 ( 18 ): 1622 - 1626 .

齐心 , 张纪帅 , 张山山 , 等 . 不同听力干预模式下听障儿童生活质量的差异性分析 [J ] . 中华耳科学杂志 , 2024 , 22 ( 1 ): 99 - 103 .

孙琴枝 . 不同助听模式的语前聋儿童听觉言语康复效果与家庭生活质量研究 [D ] . 安徽医科大学 , 2022 .

Silva JM , Campos PD , Moret ALM . Influencing variables in the quality of life of children with cochlear implants: a systematic review [C ] . Codas. Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia , 2021 , 33 : e20190153 .

张静平 , 王巍 , 梁瑞敏 , 等 . 人工耳蜗植入患儿术后生活质量评估 [J ] . 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志 , 2018 , 32 ( 17 ): 1348 - 1351 .

芦婷 , 周馨宇 , 赵霞 , 等 . 听障儿童人工耳蜗植入术后生活质量评估及影响因素分析 [J ] . 宁夏医学杂志 , 2021 , 43 ( 8 ): 718 - 721 .

芦婷 , 赵霞 , 崔梓燕 , 等 . 语前聋听障儿童人工耳蜗植入术后听觉言语能力和生活质量评估 [J ] . 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 , 2023 , 21 ( 6 ): 597 - 600 .

Kamkemr , Vanluynj . Contingent capture of involuntary visual spatial attention does not differ between normally hearing children and proficient cochlear implant users [J ] . Restorative Neurol Neurosci , 2014 , 32 ( 6 ): 799 - 811

Incerti PV , Ching TYC , Hou S , et al . Programming characteristics of cochlear implants in children: effects of aetiology and age at implantation [J ] . International Journal of Audiology , 2018 , 57 ( sup2 ): S27 - S40 .

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

儿童语言发育迟缓的研究进展

前庭导水管扩大的听力学临床表现多样性的产生机制

大龄语前聋患者人工耳蜗植入术后康复效果评估

言语自然度的研究进展

音乐疗法对老年性聋患者言语识别能力及负面情绪的影响