浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
宿迁市第一人民医院 宿迁 223800
吴敏 本科 主管护师;研究方向:危重症护理、神经相关疾病护理
徐娜,E-mail:lujiaosi3975@163.com
收稿日期:2025-01-03,
纸质出版日期:2025-05-15
移动端阅览
吴敏,李泉,徐娜.卒中后基底节失语临床特征及影响因素分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2025,23(03):264-268.
WU Min,LI Quan,XU Na.Analysis of Clinical Features and Influencing Factors of Basal Ganglia Aphasia after Stroke[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2025,23(03):264-268.
吴敏,李泉,徐娜.卒中后基底节失语临床特征及影响因素分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2025,23(03):264-268. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2025.03.010.
WU Min,LI Quan,XU Na.Analysis of Clinical Features and Influencing Factors of Basal Ganglia Aphasia after Stroke[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2025,23(03):264-268. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2025.03.010.
目的
2
分析卒中后基底节失语的临床特征及影响因素。
方法
2
选取宿迁市第一人民医院2022年8月~2024年5月收治的120例基底节性脑卒中患者为研究对象,根据卒中后是否发生失语症分为失语组(32例)、言语正常组(88例)。收集两组患者临床一般资料、实验室检查指标等数据,并进行临床语言量表与神经心理学量表评估。分析卒中后基底节失语的临床特征,并应用多因素Logistic回归分析卒中后基底节失语的影响因素。
结果
2
失语组年龄、病变部位与言语正常组对比差异显著(
P
<0.05)。失语组汉语失语成套测验(aphasia battery of Chinese,ABC)中流利性、阅读、命名、听理解、失语商(aphasia quotient,AQ)及蒙特利尔认知评估量表(Montreal cognitive assessment,MoCA)、简易精神状态量表(mini-mentalstate examination,MMSE)评分均比言语正常组低(
P
<0.05),失语组患者健康问卷(patient health questionnaire,PHQ-9)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表17项(Hamilton depression scale-17,HAMD-17)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表17项(Hamilton anxiety scale-17,HAMA-17)评分均比言语正常组高(
P
<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄增大(OR=8.776,95%CI=2.479~31.069)、病变部位为左侧基底节(OR=6.430,95%CI=2.019~20.478)、MoCA评分降低(OR=3.838,95%CI=1.513~9.738)、MMSE评分降低(OR=2.672,95%CI=1.183~6.040)、PHQ-9评分升高(OR=2.399,95%CI=1.187~4.848)、HAMD-17评分升高(OR=3.575,95%CI=1.293~9.887)、HAMA-17评分升高(OR=3.261,95%CI=1.077~9.869)是卒中后基底节失语的影响因素(
P
<0.05)。
结论
2
卒中后基底节失语患者语言功能受损,可表现出认知功能障碍及焦虑抑郁情绪,失语症的发生与年龄、左侧基底节病变、认知功能降低、焦虑抑郁情绪增加有关。
Objective
2
To analyze the clinical features and influencing factors of basal ganglia aphasia after stroke.
Methods
2
120 patients with basal ganglia stroke admitted to the Department of Intensive Care Medicine of the First People's Hospital of Suqian City from August 2022 to May 2024 were selected as the study objects. According to whether aphasia occurred after stroke
they were divided into an aphasia group (32 cases) and a normal speech group (88 cases). The baseline data
such as clinical general data and laboratory examination indicators
were collected
and clinical language scale and neuropsychological scale were evaluated in the both groups. The clinical features of basal ganglia aphasia after stroke were analyzed
and the influencing factors of basal ganglia aphasia after stroke were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression.
Results
2
There were significant differences in age and lesion site between the aphasia group and the normal speech group (
P
<
0.05).On the aphasia battery of Chinese (ABC)
Fluency
Reading
Nomenclature
Listening Comprehension
aphasia quotient
AQ score
Montreal cognitive assessment Scale (MoCA) score and Mini-Mental State examination (MMSE) score were all lower than those of the normal speech group (
P
<
0.05). Patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) score and Hamilton depression scale-17 score of aphasia group HAMD-17 score and Hamilton anxiety scale-17 score were higher than those of the normal speech group(
P
<
0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that age increased (OR=8.776
95%CI= 2.479-31.069)
lesion location was left basal ganglia (OR=6.430
95%CI= 2.019-20.478)
MoCA score decreased (OR=3.838
MOCA score decreased (OR=3.838.95%CI=1.513~9.738)
MMSE score decreased (OR=2.672
95%CI=1.183~6.040)
PHQ-9 score increased (OR=2.399
95%CI=1.187~4.848)
HAMD-17 score increased (OR=3.575
95%CI= 1.293-9.887) and increased HAMA-17 score (OR=3.261
95%CI= 1.077-9.869) were the influential factors for basal ganglia aphasia after stroke (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
The patients with basal ganglia aphasia after stroke have impaired language function
and may show cognitive dysfunction and obvious anxiety and depression. The occurrence of aphasia is related to age
left basal ganglia lesion
reduced cognitive function
and increased anxiety and depression.
中华医学会神经病学分会神经康复学组 , 中国康复医学会脑血管病专业委员会 , 中国康复研究中心 , 等 . 卒中后失语临床管理专家共识 [J ] . 中国康复理论与实践 , 2022 , 28 ( 1 ): 15 - 23 .
冯虹 , 陈苏徽 , 王慧 , 等 . 进阶式言语训练对基底节性失语的康复效果 [J ] . 神经损伤与功能重建 , 2021 , 16 ( 10 ): 587 - 589 .
Almeida VN , Radanovic M . Subcortical Aphasia: An Update [J ] . Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep , 2024 , 24 ( 11 ): 561 - 569 .
Sheppard SM , Sebastian R . Diagnosing and managing post-stroke aphasia [J ] . Expert Rev Neurother , 2021 , 21 ( 2 ): 221 - 234 .
Burton B , Isaacs M , Brogan E , et al . An updated systematic review of stroke clinical practice guidelines to inform aphasia management [J ] . Int J Stroke , 2023 , 18 ( 9 ): 1029 - 1039 .
国家卫生健康委脑卒中防治工程委员会 . 中国脑卒中防治指导规范 [M ] . 北京 : 人民卫生出版社 , 2018 . 155 - 156 .
高素荣 , 楮月发 , 石舜琴 , 等 . 汉语失语检查法标准化的研究 [J ] . 中国心理卫生杂志 , 1992 , 6 ( 3 ): 125 - 128 .
王荫华 . 汉语失语症失语类型的鉴别诊断流程(一) [J ] . 中国康复理论与实践 , 1997 , 3 ( 1 ): 10 - 12 .
张庆苏 , 纪树荣 , 李胜利 , 等 . 中国康复研究中心汉语标准失语症检查量表的信度与效度分析 [J ] . 中国康复理论与实践 , 2005 , 11 ( 9 ): 703 - 705 .
王炜 , 王鲁宁 . “蒙特利尔认知评估量表”在轻度认知损伤患者筛查中的应用 [J ] . 中华内科杂志 , 2007 , 46 ( 5 ): 414 - 416 .
Galea M , Woodward M . Mini-mental state examination(MMSE) [J ] . Aust J Physiother , 2005 , 51 ( 3 ): 198 - 199 .
Wang W , Bian Q , Zhao Y , et al . Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the general population [J ] . Gen Hosp Psychiatry , 2014 , 36 ( 5 ): 539 - 544 .
Spitzer RL , Kroenke K , Williams JB , et al . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7 [J ] . Arch Intern Med , 2006 , 166 ( 10 ): 1092 - 1097 .
Hamilton M . A rating seale for depression [J ] . J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry , 1960 , 23 ( 1 ): 56 - 62 .
Hamilton M . The assessment of anxiety states by rating [J ] . Br J Med Psychol , 1959 , 32 ( 1 ): 50 - 55 .
丛珊 , 闫隆 , 李虹 , 等 . 非侵入性脑刺激技术治疗卒中后失语症的研究进展 [J ] . 中国康复 , 2023 , 38 ( 8 ): 498 - 502 .
焦黛妍 , 邓海鹏 , 张若尘 , 等 . 脑卒中患者失语症发生的影响因子及预后 [J ] . 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 , 2019 , 17 ( 5 ): 370 - 373 .
Li Z , Hu J , Wang Z , et al . Basal ganglia stroke is associated with altered functional connectivity of the left inferior temporal gyrus [J ] . J Neuroimaging , 2022 , 32 ( 4 ): 744 - 751 .
Release C , Brady MC , Ali M , et al . Precision rehabilitation for aphasia by patient age, sex, aphasia severity, and time since stroke? A prespecified, systematic review-based, individual participant data, network, subgroup meta-analysis [J ] . Int J Stroke , 2022 , 17 ( 10 ): 1067 - 1077 .
沈锦 , 徐俊杰 , 陈慧敏 , 等 . 血清PS、Lp-PLA2水平与脑卒中患者失语的关系 [J ] . 脑与神经疾病杂志 , 2024 , 32 ( 5 ): 276 - 279 .
荆元元 . 卒中后基底节失语临床特征及静息态功能磁共振分析 [D ] . 吉林大学 , 2024 .
Shahouzaie N , Farzadfar MT , Jamali J , et al . The impact of subcortical stroke-related aphasia on executive functions and working memory [J ] . Appl Neuropsychol Adult , 2023 , 6 ( 12 ): 1 - 7 .
Weaver NA , Kuijf HJ , Aben HP , et al . Strategic infarct locations for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 12 acute ischaemic stroke cohorts [J ] . Lancet Neurol , 2021 , 20 ( 6 ): 448 - 459 .
刘鑫鑫 , 马艳玲 , 刘艳君 , 等 . 卒中后失语患者非语言认知功能损害特点的临床研究 [J ] . 中国卒中杂志 , 2019 ,( 2 ): 116 - 120 .
刘欣甜 , 王甜甜 , 吕亚婷 , 等 . 重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后抑郁的研究进展 [J ] . 中华老年心脑血管病杂志 , 2024 , 26 ( 2 ): 238 - 240 .
陈杏雨 , 吕小涵 , 李瑞娜 , 等 . 卒中后焦虑 [J ] . 国际脑血管病杂志 , 2022 , 30 ( 2 ): 129 - 133 .
马睿 , 王婷婷 , 刘洪红 , 等 . 脑卒中失语及认知障碍患者非言语性焦虑评估研究进展 [J ] . 中国康复医学杂志 , 2020 , 35 ( 4 ): 502 - 507 .
Kao SK , Chan CT . Increased risk of depression and associated symptoms in poststroke aphasia [J ] . Sci Rep , 2024 , 14 ( 1 ): 21352 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构