浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.广州大学教育学院 广州 510006
2.佛山市启聪学校 佛山 528051
3.广东省残疾人康复中心 广州 510057
陈穗清,博士 副教授;研究方向:特殊儿童语言与认知 E-mail:chensq@gzhu.edu.cn
纸质出版日期:2024-09-15,
收稿日期:2024-04-04,
移动端阅览
陈穗清,杨雪悦,朱楚月等.手语产生中语音、语义信息的加工机制[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(05):510-513.
CHEN Sui-qing,YANG Xue-yue,ZHU Chu-yue,et al.Processing Mechanism of Phonological and Semantic Information in Sign Language Production[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(05):510-513.
陈穗清,杨雪悦,朱楚月等.手语产生中语音、语义信息的加工机制[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(05):510-513. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.05.014.
CHEN Sui-qing,YANG Xue-yue,ZHU Chu-yue,et al.Processing Mechanism of Phonological and Semantic Information in Sign Language Production[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(05):510-513. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.05.014.
目的
2
考察在手语产生中,语音和语义信息在不同时间间隔(stimulus onset asynchrony,SOA)下(-100 ms、0 ms和100 ms)的激活情况,为听障儿童手语习得及教育提供参考建议。
方法
2
选取图-词干扰范式,干扰手语和图片同时(或早100 ms或晚100 ms)呈现,请被试打出目标图片代表的手语。
结果
2
①当SOA=-100 ms和100 ms时,分别出现语义干扰效应和语音干扰效应;②当SOA=100 ms时,干扰手语词的位置与目标词汇一致的情况下,受到干扰效应最大,因此出现了语音干扰效应。
结论
2
手语产生与书面语产生既有相同之处,也有自己的特点,研究结果支持了言语产生的独立两阶段模型。
Objective
2
To investigate the activation of phonological and semantic information in sign language production under different stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) conditions (-100 ms
0 ms
and 100 ms)
providing a basis for references and suggestions in the acquisition and education of sign language for hearing-impaired children.
Method
2
This experiment employed a picture-word interference paradigm
where the interfering sign language and images were presented simultaneously (or 100 ms earlier or later). Participants were asked to perform the sign language representation of the target image.
Results
2
When SOA=-100 ms and SOA=100 ms
semantic and phonological interference effects appear respectively. Under the condition of SOA=100ms
when the position of the interfering sign language word was consistent with the target word
the interference effect was the most significant
resulting in a phonological interference effect.
Conclusion
2
sign language production shares similarities with written language production but also has its own unique characteristics. The results support the independent two-stage model of speech production.
手语产生语音语义
Sign language productionPhonologicalSemantic
舒华, 程元善, 张厚粲. 235个图形的命名一致性、熟悉性、表象一致性和视觉复杂性评定[J]. 心理学报, 1989, 21(4): 389-396.
陈磊, 张积家. 手语产生:过程及影响因素[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2010, 7(7): 34-38.
张清芳, 杨玉芳.言语产生中的词汇通达理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2003, 11(1):6-11.
Carreiras M, Gutierrez-Sigut E, Baquero S, et al. Lexical processing in Spanish Sign Language (LSE) [J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2008, 58(1): 100-122.
龚群虎. 教育中手语和汉语问题的语言学分析[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2009,6(3): 63-67,37.
Wang C, Chen X, Gao W. A comparison between etymon- and word-based Chinese Sign Language recognition systems[M]. In: Gibet S, Courty N, Kamp JF (Ets.. Gesture in Human computer Interaltion and Simulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg press, 2005. 3881.
Stokoe WC. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf[J]. Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education, 2005,10(1):3-37.
Emmorey K, Damasio H, Mccullough S, et al. Neural systems underlying spatial language in American Sign Language[J]. Neuroimage, 2002, 17(2): 812-824.
李俊宏, 丁国盛. 手语和口语理解及产生的脑机制对比[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013,21(9):1560-1569.
Levelt WJM. Models of word production[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1999, 3(6): 223-232.
Caramazza, Alfonso. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? [J]. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1997, 14(1): 177-208.
张清芳,杨玉芳. 汉语词汇产生中语义、字形和音韵激活的时间进程[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(1): 1-8.
Carreiras M, Gutierrez-Sigut E, Baquero S, et al. Lexical processing in Spanish Sign Language (LSE)[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2008, 58(1): 100-122.
Baus C, Gutiérrez-sigut E, Quer J, et al. Lexical access in Catalan Signed Language (LSC) production[J]. Cognition, 2008, 108(3):856-865.
Wilson M, Emmorey K. A visuospatial "phonological loop" in working memory: Evidence from American Sign Language[J]. Memory & Cognition, 1997, 25(3):313-320.
Brentari D. Effects of language modality on word segmentation: An experimental study of phonological factors in a sign language[J]. Laboratory Phonology, 2006, 8(2): 269-298.
Corina DP, Hildebrandt H. Psycholinguistic investigations of phonological structure in ASL[J]. Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, 2002, 5(2): 125-156.
Perlmutter D. Some current claims about sign language phonetics, phonology, and experimental results[M]. In L. Goldstein, D. Whalen & C. Best (Ed.), Laboratory Phonology, 2006. 315-340.
Vinson D, Thompson RL, Skinner R, et al. A faster path between meaning and form? Iconicity facilitates sign recognition and production in British Sign Language[J]. Journal of memory and language, 2015, 82(7): 1182-1192.
Corina DP, Knapp H. Sign language processing and the mirror neuron system[J]. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 2006, 42(4): 529-539.
Baus C, Branzi F, Costa A. On the mechanism ands scope of language control in bilingual speech production [M]. In john W(Eds.). The cambridge handbook of bilingual processing: On the mechanism and scope of language control in bilingual speech production, Cambridge University Press, 2015. 508-526.
周晓林, 庄捷, 吴佳音, 等. 汉语词汇产生中音、形、义三种信息激活的时间进程[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(6): 712-718.
0
浏览量
72
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构