浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.南宁市华清听力健康研究所 南宁 530022
2.桂林市人民医院耳鼻咽喉科 桂林 541001
3.百色市中医医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科 百色 533000
4.广西医科大学 南宁 530022
韦干观 硕士 副主任医师;研究方向:耳科学韦福依 研究生 主任医师;研究方向:耳鼻咽喉头颈外科
韦干观 硕士 副主任医师;研究方向:耳科学韦福依 研究生 主任医师;研究方向:耳鼻咽喉头颈外科
毛荣清,E-mail:1143174159@qq.com
纸质出版日期:2024-09-15,
收稿日期:2024-06-14,
移动端阅览
韦干观,韦福依,谭颂华等.老年听力损失患者配戴助听器满意度调查及其影响因素分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(05):484-487.
WEI Gan-guan,WEI Fu-yi,TAN Song-hua,et al.Analysis of Satisfaction and Risk Factors of Elderly Hearing Loss Patients with Hearing Aids[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(05):484-487.
韦干观,韦福依,谭颂华等.老年听力损失患者配戴助听器满意度调查及其影响因素分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(05):484-487. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.05.008.
WEI Gan-guan,WEI Fu-yi,TAN Song-hua,et al.Analysis of Satisfaction and Risk Factors of Elderly Hearing Loss Patients with Hearing Aids[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(05):484-487. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.05.008.
目的
2
了解老年听力损失者配戴助听器后日常生活的满意度情况,为提高验配技术水平,提升满意度提供科学依据。
方法
2
抽取在南宁市新声达听力设备技术有限公司连锁店验配助听器的听力损失老人作为研究对象,采用日常生活助听满意度问卷(the satisfaction with amplification in daily life,SADL),调查听力损失程度、助听器类型、降噪功能、通道数、多麦克风、配戴时间、每日配戴时间等内容,计算被试的积极作用、服务价格、负面作用、自我形象和外观、总平均等5个维度得分,采用SPSS 25.0统计软件进行组间比较
t
检验或F检验和多重线性逐步回归分析。
结果
2
共调查319人,总均分5.15,达标率63.95%,积极作用得分5.60,达标率85.27%,服务与价格得分5.69,达标率83.70%,负面作用得分3.06、自我形象和外观得分4.46分,低于SADL标准得分。单因素分析显示,在积极作用维度,年龄、通道数、配戴时间差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05),在服务与价格维度,多麦克风差异有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05),其余单因素分析差异无统计学意义;多重线性回归分析显示,在积极作用维度,通道数、多个麦克风、配戴时间3自变量被引入方程;在服务和价格维度,多个麦克风被引入方程,其余维度没有引入变量。
结论
2
SADL平均满意度得分和达标率较高,多个麦克风和配戴时间具有正相关关系,通道数量具有负相关关系。验配师应加强与配戴者沟通,设置合理期望值,加强新技术学习,以提高助听器配戴满意度。
Objective
2
To understand the satisfaction of elderly hearing impaired patients with hearing aids in their daily lives
and to provide scientific basis for improving the technical level of fitting profession and enhancing satisfaction in the future.
Method
2
Elderly people with hearing impairments who were previously tested and wearing hearing aids at the chain store of Nanning-Xinshengda Hearing Equipment Technology Co. Ltd. in Guangxi were selected as the research subjects. The SADL scale was used to survey the degree of hearing loss
type of hearing aid
noise reduction function
number of channels
multiple microphones
historical wearing time
daily wearing time
and 15 items of the SADL survey scale. The scores of positive effects
service prices
negative effects
self-image and appearance
and total average were calculated. SPSS25.00 statistical software was used for inter group mean comparison t-test or F-test and multiple linear stepwise regression analysis.
Results
2
319 people were surveyed
with a total average score of 5.15
standard-reaching rate of 63.95%
the positive effect score of 5.60
standard-reaching rate of 85.27%
the service and price score of 5.69
and standard-reaching rate of 83.70%. However
the negative effect score was 3.06
and the self-image and appearance score was 4.46
which was lower than the SADL standard score. Univariate analysis showed that in the positive effect dimension
there were statistically significant differences in age
number of channels
and wearing time (
P
<
0.05). In the service and price dimensions
the difference in multiple microphones was statistically significant
while the other univariate analyses showed no statistically significant differences. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that in the positive effect dimension
three independent variables: channel numbers
multiple microphones
and wearing time were introduced into the equation. In the dimensions of service and price
multiple microphones are introduced into the equation
while no variables were introduced in the other dimensions.
Conclusion
2
The average satisfaction score and standard-reaching rate of SADL are relatively high
and multiple microphones and wearing time have a positive correlation
while the number of channels has a negative correlation. Hearing aid fitter need to strengthen communication with wearers
set reasonable expectations
and enhance learning of new technologies to improve wearing satisfaction.
老年性听力损失助听器满意度SADL
Elderly hearing lossHearing aidsSatisfactionSADL
鲜圆圆,高静,陈欢,等.中国老年听力损失患病率的Meta分析[J].现代预防医学,2022,49(13): 2451-2458.
听力健康蓝皮书:中国听力健康报告(2021)[EB/OL].2021. https://www.sohu.com/a/500232184_121123785https://www.sohu.com/a/500232184_121123785
Rutherford BR, Brewster K, Golub JS, et al.Sensation and Psychiatry: Linking Age-Related Hearing Loss to Late-Life Depression and Cognitive Decline[J]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 2018,175(3):215-224.
陈雪清,王硕,陈静,等.社区老年人群听力损失与认知功能下降及焦虑抑郁情绪的相关性分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2022,20(4):246-251.
Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: the SADL scale[J]. Ear Hearing,1999,20(4):306-320.
World Health Organization. World report on learing [EB/OL].2021.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240020481https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240020481.
Yeo BSY, Song HJJMD, Toh EMS, et al. Association of Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants With Cognitive Decline and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Neurol,2023, 80(2):134-141.
Yunwei Zhang, Hua Wang, Lihua Wang, et al. Hearing aids utilization, effect factors, and its benefit in the association between hearing and cognition decline: A longitudinal follow-up in Shanghai, China[J]. Experimental Gerontology,2023,181:112272.
傅新星,陈雪清,王硕,等.社区老年人群听力损失与认知功能下降及焦虑抑郁情绪的相关性分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2022,20(4):246-251.
李玉玲,张华,张建一,等.日常生活助听满意度问卷中文版复测信度评估[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2013,27(16):874-876+880.
任丹丹,陈振声.40例成人助听器配戴效果分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2020,18(4): 275-277.
黄治物,吴皓.年龄相关性听力损失研究进展与临床干预策略[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2022,42(9):1182-1187.
姚海波,孙中武.影响老年听障患者助听器验配满意度的相关因素分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2022,20(1):43-46.
Kiliç S, Yiğit Ö, Türkyilmaz MD. Listening Effort in Hearing Aid Users: Is It Related to Hearing Aid Use and Satisfaction?[J].J Am Acad Audiol, 2022,33(6):316-323.
0
浏览量
115
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构