浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.兰州大学第二医院 兰州 730000
2.华东师范大学康复科学系 上海 200062
3.东莞市康复实验学校 东莞 523000
张文艳 在读硕士 副主任治疗师;研究方向:儿童康复
徐丁,E-mail:xud@lzu.edu.cn
纸质出版日期:2024-05-15,
收稿日期:2023-06-28,
移动端阅览
张文艳,丁忠冰,张红晓等.视听语言智能康复技术对语言发育迟缓儿童语言功能的影响[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(03):306-309.
ZHANG Wen-yan,DING Zhong-bing,ZHANG Hong-xiao,et al.Effects of Audio-Visual Intelligent Rehabilitation Technology on Language Function in Children with Language Development Delay[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(03):306-309.
张文艳,丁忠冰,张红晓等.视听语言智能康复技术对语言发育迟缓儿童语言功能的影响[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(03):306-309. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.03.019.
ZHANG Wen-yan,DING Zhong-bing,ZHANG Hong-xiao,et al.Effects of Audio-Visual Intelligent Rehabilitation Technology on Language Function in Children with Language Development Delay[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(03):306-309. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.03.019.
目的
2
探究视听语言智能康复技术对语言发育迟缓儿童语言功能的影响,为语言发育迟缓儿童的语言功能训练提供临床参考依据。
方法
2
选取2022年1月~2023年3月兰州大学第二医院收治的80例语言发育迟缓儿童,随机分为研究组和对照组各40例。对照组进行常规语言训练,研究组在常规语言训练基础上联合使用视听语言智能康复技术,治疗3个月。治疗前后采用Gesell发育量表评估两组的适应性能力、语言能力、个人社交能力,并采用ICF(international classification of functioning disability and health)早期语言障碍评估与干预治疗仪对儿童词语、句子理解能力进行评估。
结果
2
治疗前两组患儿适应性能力、语言能力、个人社交能力3大能区发育商以及词语理解、句子理解能力得分无显著差异(
P
>0.05)。治疗后研究组适应性能力、语言能力、个人社交能力3大能区发育商显著提高(
P
<0.05)。两组患儿词语理解、句子理解能力得分均显著提高,且研究组显著高于对照组(
P
<0.05)。
结论
2
针对语言发育迟缓儿童语言能力的改善,常规语言训练结合视听语言智能康复技术比单纯常规语言训练效果更好。
Objective
2
This study aims to investigate the impact of audio-visual intelligent rehabilitation technology on the language function of children with language development delay.
Methods
2
From January 2022 to March 2023
we admitted a total of 80 children with language development delay to our hospital. These children were randomly divided into a study group and a control group
with 40 cases in each group. The control group received routine language and behavior training while the study group received audio-visual intelligent rehabilitation technology on top of the routine language training for 3 months. Before and after the treatment
we used the Gesell development scale to compare the adaptability
language ability
and personal social ability of both groups. Additionally
we utilized the special equipment of ICF early language disorder assessment and intervention therapy instrument to evaluate the children's ability to comprehend words and sentences.
Results
2
After treatment
the study group showed significant improvement in the development quotient for the three major areas of adaptability
language ability and personal social ability (
P
<0.05). Additionally
the scores for both word and sentence comprehension in both groups were significantly improved after treatment (
P
<0.05). Nevertheless
the study group had significantly higher scores in word comprehension and sentence comprehension compared to the control group. Prior to treatment
there was no significant difference observed between the two groups in the development quotient of adaptive ability
language ability
and personal social ability
as well as the evaluation scores of word comprehension and sentence comprehension ability (
P
>0.05).
Conclusion
2
Combining conventional language training with audio-visual language intelligent rehabilitation technology is more effective than using conventional language training alone for enhancing the language ability of children with language retardation.
视听语言智能康复技术语言发育迟缓语言功能
Audio-visual intelligent rehabilitation technologyLanguage development delayLanguage function
Arora NK, Nair MKC, Gulati S, et al. Neurodevelopmental disorders in children aged 2~9 years: Population-based burden estimates across five regions in India[J]. PLoS medicine, 2018, 15(7): e1002615.
Cheung RW, Willan K, Dickerson J, et al. Risk factors for early language delay in children within a minority ethnic, bilingual, deprived environment (Born in Bradford's Better Start): a UK community birth cohort study[J]. BMJ Paediatr Open, 2023,7(1):e001764.
Marshall J, Harding S, Roulstone S. Language development, delay and intervention-the views of parents from communities that speech and language therapy managers in England consider to be under-served[J]. Int J Lang Commun Disord,2017,52(4):489-500.
刘慧燕,宋燕燕,张舒琴,等.语言发育迟缓儿童的行为及语言特征分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2023,31(4):365-368.
林爱兰,柳雪霞,白云英.语言发育迟缓儿童训练综合护理干预效果分析[J].福建医药杂志,2022,44(2):153-154.
丁忠冰,王勇丽,李孝洁,等.实时言语重读训练治疗痉挛型脑瘫儿童言语流利性障碍[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2023,31(1):7-11.
黄昭鸣,籍静媛.实时反馈技术在言语矫治中的应用[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2004,2(6):35-39.
Hidecker MJ, Paneth N, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy[J]. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2011,53(8):704-710.
章依文,金星明,沈晓明,等.2~3岁儿童语言发育迟缓筛查标准的建立[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2003,11(5):308-310.
金星明,静进.发育与行为儿科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2020.170-175.
邱卓英,李沁燚,陈迪,等.ICF-CY理论架构、方法、分类体系及其应用[J].中国康复理论与实践,2014,20(01):1-5.
王燕娜,史惟.复旦中文版沟通功能分级系统的信度和效度研究[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2017,12(05):321-327.
李婕,韩馨瑶,袁青骋,等.Gesell发育量表言语能力测试部分的语言学原理及本土化建议[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(03):333-336.
吴丽英,宋晓英,马晨红,等.早期综合干预对语言发育迟缓儿童康复效果的影响[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(02):196-199.
刘小英,杨梅凤,刘文龙.语言发育迟缓儿童社会适应能力与心智发育水平的关系研究[J].护理学杂志,2015,30(17):26-28.
单新亚,李宾,田晶,等.启智博士早期语言评估与干预仪对3~6岁语言发育迟缓儿童的治疗效果[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2021,19(06):455-457.
0
浏览量
156
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构