浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院 北京 100045
史泱 硕士 主治医师;研究方向:听觉言语康复
曲春燕,E-mail:quchunyan72@163.com
纸质出版日期:2024-05-15,
收稿日期:2023-02-22,
移动端阅览
史泱,尹梦雅,曲春燕.3~5岁听障儿童与健听儿童不同送气方式塞音发音清晰度比较研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(03):298-302.
SHI Yang,YIN Meng-ya,QU Chun-yan.A Comparative Study on the Articulation of Plosive Sounds in Children with Hearing Impairment and Healthy Hearing at the Age of 3-5 Years[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(03):298-302.
史泱,尹梦雅,曲春燕.3~5岁听障儿童与健听儿童不同送气方式塞音发音清晰度比较研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(03):298-302. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.03.017.
SHI Yang,YIN Meng-ya,QU Chun-yan.A Comparative Study on the Articulation of Plosive Sounds in Children with Hearing Impairment and Healthy Hearing at the Age of 3-5 Years[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(03):298-302. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.03.017.
目的
2
比较学龄前听障儿童与健听儿童塞音清晰度,分析不同送气方式下听障儿童不同发音部位塞音的发音难度,探讨影响其清晰度的原因,为送气塞音康复训练提供依据。
方法
2
选择3~5岁听障儿童104名和健听儿童36名,以《汉语构音能力测验词表》为测试材料,分析不同送气方式塞音的发音清晰度。
结果
2
①3~5岁健听儿童的塞音已习得(≥90%),各年龄段送气塞音的清晰度与不送气塞音相同,送气方式不同对各年龄段塞音清晰度的影响无显著差异(
P
>
0.05);②3~5岁听障儿童的塞音均未习得(<90%),送气塞音的清晰度小于不送气塞音,两者的清晰度有显著差异(
P
=0.010≤0.01);③3~5岁各个年龄段无论送气与否,听障儿童与健听儿童的发音清晰度均有显著差异(
P
<0.05);④是否送气不影响听障儿童对舌根音声母的习得。
结论
2
听障儿童对发音位置靠前的送气塞音习得更加困难,训练时需加强听障儿童对送气的感知,提高送气塞音的清晰度。
Objective
2
Compare the articulation of plosives between preschool children with hearing impairments and healthy children
analyze the difficulty of plosives in different parts of hearing impairments under different air supply methods
explore the underlying reasons that affect their articulation
and provide a basis for rehabilitation training of air supply plosives.
Methods
2
104 hearing-impaired children aged 3 to 5 years who have recovered for more than half a year and 36 healthy hearing children were used to analyze the articulation of plosives in different modes of air supply using the Chinese Phonetic Ability Test Vocabulary as the test material.
Results
2
The plosives of healthy children aged 3-5 years had been learned (≥90%). The articulation of aspirated plosives was the same as that of unaspirated plosives in all age groups. The influence of different aspirating methods on the articulation of plosives in all age groups was not statistically significant (
P
=1.000). The plosives of hearing impaired children aged 3-5 years were not learned (
<
90%)
and the definition of aspirated
plosives was less than that of unaspirated plosives. The difference between the definition of aspirated plosives and unaspirated plosives was statistically significant (
P
=0.010≤0.01). The difference of articulation between hearing impaired children and healthy children at all ages of 3-5 years old was statistically significant
regardless of whether they were aspirated or not. Whether to breathe or not did not affect the acquisition of the initial consonants of the tongue root sound in hearing-impaired children.
Conclusion
2
It is more difficult for hearing-impaired children to acquire aspirated stops with the front of the pronunciation position. During training
it is necessary to strengthen their perception of aspirated stops and improve the clarity of aspirated stops.
听障儿童构音障碍塞音送气方式清晰度
Hearing impaired childrenDysarthriaPlosiveAir supplyArticulation
冉启斌,石锋. 塞音的声学格局分析[C].第八届中国语音学学术会议暨庆贺吴宗济先生百岁华诞语音科学前沿问题国际研讨会(PCC2008/ISPF2008)论文集. 2008.1-6.
杜青.普通话语音学教程[M].北京:中国广播电视出版社,2006.29-31.
张芳,史泱,晁欣,等.3~5岁听障儿童与健听儿童言语清晰度的比较研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2014,12(5):375-377.
夏欣雨.人工耳蜗植入儿童普通话塞音的产出与感知研究[D].同济大学,2019.
黄昭鸣,杜晓新.言语障碍的评估与矫治[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2006.113-117.
Serry TA,Blamey PJ.A 4-YEAR investigation into phonetic inventory development in young cochlear implant users[J].Journal of Speech, language, and hearing Research,1999,42(1):141-154.
McMurray B,Tanenhaus MK,Aslin RN.Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access[J]. Cognition,2002,86(2):B33-B42.
刘莎,韩德民,吴璇,等.听力正常学龄前儿童语音发育规律研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2008,22(7):301-301.
李嵬,祝华,BarbaraDodd,等.说普通话儿童的语音习得[J]. 心理学报,2000,32(2):170-176.
史泱,张芳,晁欣,等.学前听障儿童声母正确率与康复时间的相关性研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2014,12(6):446-449.
牛海军.普通话送气与不送气塞音的空气动力学和声学特征分析(英文)[A]. 中国中文信息学会、新加坡中文与东方语言信息处理学会、武汉大学语言与信息研究中心.中国计算技术与语言问题研究——第七届中文信息处理国际会议论文集[C].2007.6.
边卫花.中日发音人汉语普通话声母的声学特征[D].北京语言大学.2009.6.
冉启斌.变异与分化——较大样本视角下的北京话塞音格局[J].语言文字应用,2017,11(4):29-37.
黄昭鸣,朱群怡,张蕾,等.健听儿童与听障儿童舌根塞音构音异常声学特征的比较研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2009,7(6):60-63.
夏静宇,管燕平,薛永强.4.5-5.5岁聋儿与正常儿童语音清晰度的比较[J].中国康复理论与实践,2012,18(8):707-709.
韩德民,许时昂.听力学基础与临床[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2004.428-463
张川.听力障碍儿童汉语普通话塞音发音的实验分析[D].广西师范大学.2008.
史泱,张芳,晁欣,等.3~5岁听障儿童与健听儿童声母发音清晰度比较研究[J].中国听力语言康复学杂志,2016,14(4):262-265.
0
浏览量
60
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构