浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
言语刺激强度对健听者听配能的影响——瞳孔测量研究
The Impact of the Speech Presentation Level on Listening Effort in Normal Hearing Population- A Pupillometry Study
- 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 2024年22卷第2期 页码：120-125
- 作者机构：
复旦大学附属华东医院上海市老年医学临床重点实验室 上海 200040
- 作者简介：
张敏 博士 助理研究员；研究方向：听配能在听觉认知功能康复中的应用和听配能心理生理测量方法的临床转化
保志军，E-mail：Zhijunbao@fudan.edu.cn
- 基金信息：上海市临床重点专科建设项目(shslczdzk02801)
DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.02.003
中图分类号： R764.5纸质出版日期：2024-03-15，
收稿日期：2024-01-11，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张敏,鲁秀玲,王娇锋等.言语刺激强度对健听者听配能的影响——瞳孔测量研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(02):120-125.
ZHANG Min,LU Xiu-ling,WANG Jiao-feng,et al.The Impact of the Speech Presentation Level on Listening Effort in Normal Hearing Population - A Pupillometry Study[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(02):120-125.
张敏,鲁秀玲,王娇锋等.言语刺激强度对健听者听配能的影响——瞳孔测量研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(02):120-125. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.02.003.
ZHANG Min,LU Xiu-ling,WANG Jiao-feng,et al.The Impact of the Speech Presentation Level on Listening Effort in Normal Hearing Population - A Pupillometry Study[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(02):120-125. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.02.003.
摘要
目的
2
探究言语刺激强度对健听者听配能的影响。
方法
2
选取38例健听成人，采用语速x刺激强度的言语理解测试范式，将瞳孔扩张听配能测量和听觉任务完成准确度及反应速度相结合，观察阈上范围内20 dB SPL的强度变化对听配能和任务表现的影响。
结果
2
语速对平均瞳孔扩张有显著影响（
P
<
0.001，
<math id="M1"><msubsup><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math>
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889148&type=
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889134&type=
2.45533323
3.64066648
=0.618），但刺激强度对平均瞳孔扩张无显著影响（
P
=0.213，
<math id="M2"><msubsup><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math>
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889148&type=
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889134&type=
2.45533323
3.64066648
=0.040）。增加言语刺激强度能够显著提升任务反应速度（
P
=0.043，
<math id="M3"><msubsup><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math>
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889135&type=
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889150&type=
2.45533323
3.64066648
=0.099），在正常语速下，还能够显著提升言语理解准确度（
P
<
0.001，
<math id="M4"><msubsup><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math>
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889138&type=
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889137&type=
2.45533323
3.64066648
=0.374）。
结论
2
健听人群听觉舒适阈范围内将言语声刺激强度增加20 dB SPL能够提高聆听效率，但该效应可能并不是通过改变可听度或唤醒度，从而影响听配能结果，可能是改变听觉处理速度。
Abstract
Objective
2
Exploring the impact of speech presentation level on listening effort in a group of normal hearing listeners.
Methods
2
38 adults with normal hearing were recruited
and the speech comprehension test paradigm was used with manipulations of speech rate and presentation level. The pupil dilation as the index of listening effort
speech comprehension accuracy and reaction time were measured to observe the effect of 20 dB SPL increase in presentation level on task performance outcomes.
Results
2
The speech rate has a significant impact on average pupil dilation (
P
<
0.001
<math id="M5"><msubsup><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math>
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889161&type=
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889163&type=
2.45533323
3.64066648
=0.618). However
the sound intensity has no significant effect on the average pupil dilation (
P
=0.213
<math id="M6"><msubsup><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math>
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889161&type=
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889163&type=
2.45533323
3.64066648
=0.040). Increasing the volume of speech can significantly shorten the task response time (
P
=0.043
<math id="M7"><msubsup><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math>
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889161&type=
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889163&type=
2.45533323
3.64066648
=0.099)
and under normal speech speed
it can significantly improve the accuracy of speech comprehension (
P
<
0.001
<math id="M8"><msubsup><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">2</mn></mrow></msubsup></math>
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889180&type=
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=56889178&type=
2.45533323
3.64066648
=0.374).
Conclusion
2
Increasing the intensity of speech presentation by 20 dB SPL within the range of auditory comfort threshold in normal hearing individuals can increase listening efficiency
however
this effect may not be due to listening effort change by altering audibility or arousal
but rather a result of altering auditory processing speed.
关键词
可听度言语刺激强度听配能唤醒度
Keywords
AudibilitySpeech presentation levelListening effortArousal
references
Fabie JE, Shannon CM, Schvartz-Leyzac K, et al. Discrepancies Between Expected and Actual Cochlear Implant-Related Functional Outcomes [J]. Otol Neurotol, 2023, 44(10): 997-1003.
Patel TR, Moberly AC, Tamati TN. Development of a Sentence Verification Task to Measure Speech Comprehension and Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Users [J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2023, 66(10): 4150-4159.
Picou EM, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BWY. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort [J]. Ear and hearing, 2013, 34(5): e52-e64.
Brennan MA, Lewis D, McCreery R, et al. Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss [J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 2017, 28(9): 823-837.
Kahneman D. Attention and effort [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.40-50.
Pichora-Fuller MK, Kramer SE, Eckert MA, et al. Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL) [J]. Ear and Hearing, 2016, 37(Sup 1): 5-27.
张敏, Catherine, Palmer. 单一资源理论模型在听配能研究中的应用 [J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2017, 15(3): 205-208.
张敏, Palmer CV. 听配能(listening effort)调控研究与临床听觉康复 [J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2019, 17(01): 16-23.
Hockey GR. Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framework [J]. Biol Psychol, 1997, 45(1-3): 73-93.
张敏, Palmer CV. 语言理解易度模型与听配能 [J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2018, 16(3):226-230.
Rönnberg J, Rudner M, Foo C, et al. Cognition counts: a working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU) [J]. Int J Audiol, 2008, 47 Suppl 2: S99-105.
Herrmann B, Johnsrude IS. A model of listening engagement (MoLE) [J]. Hear Res, 2020, 397: 108016.
Goudbeek M, Scherer K. Beyond arousal: valence and potency/control cues in the vocal expression of emotion [J]. J Acoust Soc Am, 2010, 128(3): 1322-1336.
Weninger F, Eyben F, Schuller BW, et al. On the Acoustics of Emotion in Audio: What Speech, Music, and Sound have in Common [J]. Front Psychol, 2013, 4: 292.
Saderi D, Schwartz ZP, Heller CR, et al. Dissociation of task engagement and arousal effects in auditory cortex and midbrain [J]. eLife, 2021, 10:1-25.
Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Jansma EP, et al. Effects of Hearing Impairment and Hearing Aid Amplification on Listening Effort: A Systematic Review [J]. Ear Hear, 2017, 38(3): 267-281.
Winn M, Edwards JR. The impact of spectral resolution on listening effort revealed by pupil dilation [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2013, 134(5): 4233-4242.
Zhang M, Siegle GJ, McNeil MR, et al. The role of reward and task demand in value-based strategic allocation of auditory comprehension effort [J]. Hear Res, 2019, 381: 107775.
张华, 王硕, 王靓, 等. 普通话言语测听双音节词表的编辑与初步等价性评估 [J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2006, 41(6): 425-429.
Siegle GJ, Ichikawa N, Steinhauer S. Blink before and after you think: blinks occur prior to and following cognitive load indexed by pupillary responses [J]. Psychophysiology, 2008, 45(5): 679-687.
Granholm E, Asarnow RF, Sarkin AJ, et al. Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations[J]. Psychophysiology, 1996, 33(4): 457-461.
Ahern S, Beatty J. Pupillary responses during information processing vary with Scholastic Aptitude Test scores[J]. Science, 1979, 205(4412): 1289-1292.
Verney SP, Granholm E, Dionisio DP. Pupillary responses and processing resources on the visual backward masking task[J]. Psychophysiology, 2001, 38(1): 76-83.
Bach DR, Schächinger H, Neuhoff JG, et al. Rising sound intensity: an intrinsic warning cue activating the amygdala [J]. Cerebral Cortex, 2008, 18(1): 145-150.
Neuhoff JG. Perceptual bias for rising tones [J]. Nature, 1998, 395(6698): 123-124.
Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility [J]. Ear and Hearing, 2010, 31(4): 480-490.
Beatty J, Lucero-Wagoner B. The Pupillary System [M]. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG, eds. Handbook of Psychophysiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 142-162.
Ilie G, Thompson WF. A comparison of acoustic cues in music and speech for three dimensions of affect [J]. Music Perception, 2006, 23(4): 319-330.
Woods DL, Alain C, Covarrubias D, et al. Frequency-related differences in the speed of human auditory processing [J]. Hear Res, 1993, 66(1): 46-52.
Prakash H, Abraham A, Rajashekar B, et al. The effect of intensity on the speech evoked auditory late latency response in normal hearing individuals [J]. Journal of International Advanced Otology, 2016, 12(1):67-71.
Folyi T, Fehér B, Horváth J. Stimulus-focused attention speeds up auditory processing[J]. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2012, 84(2): 155-163.
Hochberg I. Most comfortable listening for the loudness and intelligibility of speech [J]. Audiology, 1975, 14(1): 27-33.
Picou EM. How Hearing Loss and Age Affect Emotional Responses to Nonspeech Sounds [J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2016, 59(5): 1233-1246.
Picou EM, Rakita L, Buono GH, et al. Effects of Increasing the Overall Level or Fitting Hearing Aids on Emotional Responses to Sounds [J]. Trends in hearing, 2021, 25: 23312165211049938.
Ruohonen EM, Kattainen S, Li X, et al. Event-related potentials to changes in sound intensity demonstrate alterations in brain function related to depression and aging [J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2020, 14: 98-108.
Koch X, Janse E. Speech rate effects on the processing of conversational speech across the adult life span [J]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2016, 139(4): 1618-1631.
Nagel IE, Preuschhof C, Li S-C, et al. Performance level modulates adult age differences in brain activation during spatial working memory [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 106(52): 22552-22557.
张敏, 王娇锋, 傅蕾, 等. 瞳孔追踪技术在客观量化老年人听配能中的考虑 [J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2020, 18(4): 262-265.
0
浏览量
152
下载量
0
CSCD
- 网络PDF下载
- WORD下载
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 京ICP备2023010756号-1
京公网安备11010502052338 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies