全喉切除术发声重建后嗓音主客观评估研究进展

吴滨燕; 康晓茜; KIM HaKyung; 郑钦

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.01.020

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

全喉切除术发声重建后嗓音主客观评估研究进展

综述 | 更新时间：2024-03-22

- 全喉切除术发声重建后嗓音主客观评估研究进展
- Advances in Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Voice after Total Laryngectomy
- 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 2024年22卷第1期页码：74-78
- 作者机构：
  
  1.华东师范大学教育学部康复科学系上海 200062
  2.上海市第一妇婴保健院上海 201204
- 作者简介：
  
  吴滨燕，硕士研究生；研究方向：言语康复理论与实践、孤独症儿童教育与康复
  KIM HaKyung，E-mail：hgjin@spe.ecnu.edu.cn
  郑钦，E-mail：zhengqin289@126.com
- 基金信息：
  
  2021年国家社会科学基金重大项目(21&ZD294);上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院临床研究助推计划（临+计划）
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.01.020
  中图分类号： R322.3+2;R767.92
- 纸质出版日期：2024-01-15，
  
  收稿日期：2023-03-15，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吴滨燕,康晓茜,KIM HaKyung等.全喉切除术发声重建后嗓音主客观评估研究进展[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(01):74-78.

WU Bin-yan,KANG Xiao-xi,KIM HaKyung,et al.Advances in Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Voice after Total Laryngectomy[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(01):74-78.
吴滨燕,康晓茜,KIM HaKyung等.全喉切除术发声重建后嗓音主客观评估研究进展[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(01):74-78. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.01.020.

WU Bin-yan,KANG Xiao-xi,KIM HaKyung,et al.Advances in Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Voice after Total Laryngectomy[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(01):74-78. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.01.020.

摘要

全喉切除术是治疗晚期喉癌的主要策略，该手术会改变患者生活，对嗓音产生深远影响。术后患者不可避免会失去喉这一发声器官，从而导致失声。目前，针对无喉患者的发声重建从以下3种方式进行，食管言语、气管食道言语和电子喉言语。嗓音评估一般采用感知声音量表、自评量表或问卷以及声学仪器测量。本文针对全喉切除术后嗓音评估进行追溯与总结，关注目前主流的评估方式，探究全喉切除术后的嗓音质量。

Abstract

Total laryngectomy is the main strategy for the treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer; however

total laryngectomy remains a life-changing procedure that has a profound impact on the voice. Postoperative patients inevitably lose the larynx as a vocal organ

resulting in voice loss. Vocal reconstruction for laryngectomized patients is currently performed from three modalities: esophageal speech

tracheoesophageal speech

and electronic laryngeal speech. Voice is also generally assessed from perceived voice scales

self-assessment scales or questionnaires

and acoustic instrument measurements. In this paper

we will trace and summarize the voice assessment after total laryngectomy

focusing on the current mainstream assessment methods and exploring the voice quality after total laryngectomy.

关键词

全喉切除术嗓音质量嗓音主客观评估

Keywords

Total laryngectomyVoice qualitySubjective and objective evaluation of voice

references

Pressman JJ.Lxiii Submucosal Compartmentation of the Larynx[J]. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology,1956,65(3):766-771.

Pawar PV, Sayed SI, Kazi R, et al.Current status and future prospects in prosthetic voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy[J]. Cancer Res Ther,2008,4(4):186-191.

Van Der Molen L, Kornman AL, Latenstein MN,et al.Practice of laryngectomy rehabilitation interventions: a perspective from Europe/the Netherlands[J]. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 2013, 21(3): 230-238.

Oates J. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Disordered Voice Quality[J]. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 2009, 61(1): 49-56.

Liu B, Polce E, Jiang J. An Objective Parameter to Classify Voice Signals Based on Variation in Energy Distribution[J]. Journal of Voice, 2019, 33(5): 591-602.

Negus V. The Mechanism Of The Larynx[J]. The Laryngoscope, 1957, 67(10):961-968.

Sundberg J. Level and Center Frequency of the Singer's Formant[J]. Journal of Voice, 2001, 15(2): 176-186.

日本音声言語医学会编.声の检查法一基础篇.第2版[M].东京:医齿药出版株式会社,1994.91-92.

Isshiki N, Olamura M, Tanabe M, et al.Differential diagnosis of hoarseness[J].Folia Phoniatr (Basel),1969,21:9-23.

Hirano M. Clinical Examination of Voice[M].New York: Springer-Verlag,1981.78-80.

Torrejano G, Guimanrães I.Voice Quality After Supracricoid Laryngectomy and Total Laryngectomy With Insertion of Voice Prosthesis[J]. Journal of Voice, 2009, 23(2): 240-246.

Makeieff M, Barbotte E, Giovanni A,et al.Acoustic and Aerodynamic Measurement of Speech Production after Supracricoid Partial Laryngectomy[J].The Laryngoscope,2005,115(3): 546-551.

Singh A,Kazi R,De Cordova J,et al.Multidimensional Assessment of Voice After Vertical Partial Laryngectomy: A Comparison With Normal and Total Laryngectomy Voice[J]. Journal of Voice, 2008, 22(6): 740-745.

Lundström E, Hammarberg B. Speech and Voice after Laryngectomy: Perceptual and Acoustical Analysese of Tracheoesophageal Speech Related to Voice Handicap Index[J]. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica,2011,63(2):98-108.

Chone CT,Spina AL,Crespo AN,et al.Speech rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: long-term results with indwelling voice prosthesis Blom-Singer®[J].Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 2005, 71(4): 504-509.

Pereira Da Silva A,Feliciano T,Vaz Freitas S,et al.Quality of Life in Patients Submitted to Total Laryngectomy[J].Journal of Voice,2015,29(3): 382-388.

Antin F,Breheret R,Goineau A,et al.Rehabilitation following total laryngectomy: Oncologic, functional, socio-occupational and psychological aspects[J]. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases,2021,138(1): 19-22.

Van Sluis KE,Van Son RJJH,Van Der Molen L,et al.Multidimensional evaluation of voice outcomes following total laryngectomy: a prospective multicenter cohort study[J].European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology,2021,278(4):1209-1222.

Galli A,Giordano L,Biafora M,et al.Voice prosthesis rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: are satisfaction and quality of life maintained over time?[J].Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica, 2019, 39(3): 162-168.

Schuering JHC,Van Hof KS,Heijnen BJ,et al.Proposal for a Core Outcome Set of Measurement Instruments to Assess Quality of Voice in Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia Based on a Literarure Review[J].Journal of Voice, 2021,35(06):933.e7-933.e21.

Allegra E,La Mantia I,Bianco MR,et al.Verbal performance of total laryngectomized patients rehabilitated with esophageal speech and tracheoesophageal speech: impacts on patient quality of life[J].Psychology Research and Behavior Management,2019,12:675-681.

Granda Membiela CM,Fernández Gutiérrez MJ,Mamolar Andrés S,et al.La voz del laringectomizado: incapacidad, percepción y análisis acústico[J]. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 2016, 36(3): 127-134.

Van Sluis KE,Van Der Molen L,Van Son RJJH,et al.Objective and subjective voice outcomes after total laryngectomy: a systematic review[J].European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology,2018, 275(1): 11-26.

Moerman M,Pieters G,Martens JP,et al.Objective evaluation of the quality of substitution voices[J]. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology,2004, 261(10): 541-547.

Schindler A, Mozzanica F, Ginoccgio D,et al.Voice-related quality of life in patients after total and partial laryngectomy[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2012, 39(1): 77-83.

Barone NA, Ludlow CL,Tellis CM.Acoustic and Aerodynamic Comparisons of Voice Qualities Produced After Voice Training[J]. Journal of Voice, 2021, 35(1): 157.e11-157.e21.

Valentino WL,Park J, Alnouri G,et al.Diagnostic Value of Acoustic and Aerodynamic Measurements in Vocal Fold Movement Disorders and their Correlation with Laryngeal Electromyography and Voice Handicap Index[J]. Journal of Voice, 2021, 35(3): 497.e1-497.e4.

Buzaneli E,Zenari M,Kulcsar M,et al.Supracricoid Laryngectomy: The Function of the Remaining Arytenoid in Voice and Swallowing[J]. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology,2018,22(03): 303-312.

Coffey MM,Tolley N,Howard D,et al.Evaluating the effect of different voice prostheses on alaryngeal voice quality: Effect Different Voice Prostheses on Voice Quality[J]. The Laryngoscope, 2018, 128(11): 2460-2466.

Nemr K,Simões-zenari M,Cordeiro GF,et al.GRBAS and Cape-V Scales: High Reliability and Consensus When Applied at Different Times[J]. Journal of Voice, 2012, 26(6): 812.e17-812.e22.

Hurren A,Hildreth AJ, Carding PN.Can we perceptually rate alaryngeal voice? Developing the Sunderland Tracheoesophageal Voice Perceptual Scale: Alaryngeal voice: perceptual rating[J].Clinical Otolaryngology,2009,34(6): 533-538.

Van As CJ, Koopmans-Van Beinum FJ, Pols LCW, et al. Perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal speech by naive and experienced judges through the use of semantic differential scales. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003; 46:947959.

Moerman M, Martens JP, Crevier-Buchman L, et al. The INFVo perceptual rating scale for substitution voicing: development and reliability. Eur Arch OtoRhino-Laryngol 2006; 263:435-439.

Hurren A, Miller N. Voice outcomes post total laryngectomy[J]. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery, 2017, 25(3): 205-210.

Hurren A.The development of a new rating scale for the perceptual assessment of tracheoesophageal voice quality outcome following total laryngectomy[D]. Newcastle University.2014.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据