Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Jansma EP, et al. Effects of hearing impairment and hearing aid amplification on listening effort: A systematic review[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2017, 38(3): 267-267.

Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2014, 35(6): 600-610.

Downs DW. Effects of hearing aid use on speech discrimination and listening effort[J]. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1982, 47(2): 189-193.

Hornsby BWY. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2013, 34(5): 523-534.

Humes LE, Christensen L, Thomas T, et al. A comparison of the aided performance and benefit provided by a linear and a two-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing aid[J]. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1999, 42(1): 65-79.

Noble W, Gatehouse S. Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ)[J]. International Journal of Audiology, 2006, 45(3): 172-181.

Picou EM, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BWY. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2013, 34(5): e52-e64.

Johnson JA, Xu J, Cox RM. Impact of hearing aid technology on outcomes in daily life II: Speech understanding and listening effort[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2016, 37(5): 529-540.

Brody L, Wu YH, Stangl E. A comparison of personal sound amplification products and hearing aids in ecologically relevant test environments[J]. American Journal of Audiology, 2018, 27(4): 581-593.

Korczak PA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing aids on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2005, 26(2): 165-185.

Chong FY, Jenstad LM. A critical review of hearing-aid single-microphone noise-reduction studies in adults and children[J]. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2018, 13(6): 600-608.

Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA. Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners[J]. Trends in Hearing, 2014, 18: 2331216514553924.

Sarampalis A, Kalluri S, Edwards B, et al. Objective Measures of Listening Effort: Effects of Background Noise and Noise Reduction[J]. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2009, 52(5): 1230-1240.

Gustafson S, Mccreery R, Hoover B, et al. Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2014, 35(2):183-194.

Ng EHN, Rudner M, Lunner T, et al. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users[J]. International Journal of Audiology, 2013, 52(7): 433-441.

Ng EHN, Rudner M, Lunner T, et al. Noise reduction improves memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign language speech[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2015, 36(1): 82-91.

Lunner T, Rudner M, Rosenbom T, et al. Using speech recall in hearing aid fitting and outcome evaluation under ecological test conditions[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2016, 37( Suppl 1): 145S-154S.

Reinten I, De Ronde-Brons I, Houben R, et al. Measuring the influence of noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired listeners using response times to an arithmetic task in noise[J]. Trends in Hearing, 2021, 25: 23312165211014437.

Wendt D, Hietkamp RK, Lunner T. Impact of noise and noise reduction on processing effort: A pupillometry study[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2017, 38(6): 690-700.

Bernarding C, Strauss DJ, Hannemann R, et al. Neurodynamic evaluation of hearing aid features using EEG correlates of listening effort[J]. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 2017, 11(3): 203-215.

Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, et al. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response[J]. Hearing Research, 2018, 365: 90-99.

Fiedler L, Ala TS, Graversen C, et al. Hearing aid noise reduction lowers the sustained listening effort during continuous speech in noise—A combined pupillometry and EEG study[J]. Ear and hearing, 2021, 42(6): 1590-1601.

Desjardins JL. The effects of hearing aid directional microphone and noise reduction processing on listening effort in older adults with hearing loss[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2016, 27(01): 29-41.

Purdy SC, Welch D, Giles E, et al. Impact of cognition and noise reduction on speech perception in adults with unilateral cochlear implants[J]. Cochlear Implants International, 2017, 18(3): 162-170.

Kuk F, Slugocki C, Korhonen P. An integrative evaluation of the efficacy of a directional microphone and noise-reduction algorithm under realistic signal-to-noise ratios[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2020, 31(04): 262-270.

Dingemanse G, Goedegebure A. Listening effort in cochlear implant users: The effect of speech intelligibility, noise reduction processing, and working memory capacity on the pupil dilation response[J]. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2022, 65(1): 392-404.

Hoetink AE, Körössy L, Dreschler WA. Classification of steady state gain reduction produced by amplitude modulation based noise reduction in digital hearing aids[J]. International Journal of Audiology, 2009, 48(7): 444-455.

Picou EM, Ricketts TA. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss[J]. International Journal of Audiology, 2017, 56(12): 909-918.

Westover L, Ostevik A, Aalto D, et al. Evaluation of word recognition and word recall with bone conduction devices: do directional microphones free up cognitive resources?[J]. International Journal of Audiology, 2020, 59(5): 367-373.

Winneke AH, Schulte M, Vormann M, et al. Effect of directional microphone technology in hearing aids on neural correlates of listening and memory effort: an electroencephalographic study[J]. Trends in Hearing, 2020, 24: 2331216520948410.

Hollfelder D, Prein L, Jürgens T, et al. Influence of directional microphones on listening effort in middle ear implant users[J]. HNO, 2022, 71(6): 375-385.

Gustafson SJ, Ricketts TA, Picou EM. Individual differences offer insight into clinical recommendations for directional and remote microphone technology use in children[J]. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2021, 64(2): 635-650.

Oosthuizen I, Picou EM, Pottas L, et al. Listening effort in school-aged children with limited useable hearing unilaterally: Examining the effects of a personal, digital remote microphone system and a contralateral routing of signal system[J]. Trends in Hearing, 2021, 25: 2331216520984700.

Feldman JI, Thompson E, Davis H, et al. Remote microphone systems can improve listening-in-noise accuracy and listening effort for youth with autism[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2022, 43(2): 436-447.

Cruz AD, Gagné JP, Cruz WM, et al. The effects of using hearing aids and a frequency modulated system on listening effort among adolescents with hearing loss[J]. International Journal of Audiology, 2020, 59(2): 117-123.

Kokx-Ryan M, Cohen J, Cord MT, et al. Benefits of nonlinear frequency compression in adult hearing aid users[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2015, 26(10): 838-855.

Shehorn J, Marrone N, Muller T. Speech perception in noise and listening effort of older adults with non-linear frequency compression hearing aids[J]. Ear and Hearing, 2018, 39(2): 215-225.

Brennan MA, Lewis D, McCreery R, et al. Listening effort and speech recognition with frequency compression amplification for children and adults with hearing loss[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2017, 28(09): 823-837.

Kuk F, Slugocki C, Korhonen P, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of a dual variable speed compressor over a single fixed speed compressor[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2019, 30(07): 590-606.

Chen Y, Wong LLN, Kuehnel V, et al. Can Dual Compression Offer Better Mandarin Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality Than Fast-Acting Compression?[J]. Trends in Hearing, 2021, 25: 2331216521997610.