航空机务人员噪声性听力损失的现状调查

巩丰媛; 党梓怡; 黄凤月; 张莉莉; 刘军; 金占国

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.01.016

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

航空机务人员噪声性听力损失的现状调查

临床研究 | 更新时间：2024-03-22

- 航空机务人员噪声性听力损失的现状调查
- Investigation of the Current Situation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss among Aviation Crews
- 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 2024年22卷第1期页码：58-60
- 作者机构：
  
  1.空军特色医学中心航空航天眩晕诊疗研究中心北京 100142
  2.河北北方学院研究生院张家口 075000
  3.空军特色医学中心空天医学总体论证研究室北京 100140
  4.解放军总医院第七医学中心耳鼻咽喉科北京 100700
- 作者简介：
  
  巩丰媛在读硕士；研究方向：噪声性听力损失
  金占国，E-mail：ccjzg@126.com
- 基金信息：
  
  全军医学科技青年培育项目(14QNP067);军队后勤科研重点项目(BKJ23WS1J002)
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.01.016
  中图分类号： R764.43+3
- 纸质出版日期：2024-01-15，
  
  收稿日期：2023-11-28，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
巩丰媛,党梓怡,黄凤月等.航空机务人员噪声性听力损失的现状调查[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(01):58-60.

GONG Feng-yuan,Dang Zi-yi,Huang Feng-yue,et al.Investigation of the Current Situation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss among Aviation Crews[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(01):58-60.
巩丰媛,党梓怡,黄凤月等.航空机务人员噪声性听力损失的现状调查[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(01):58-60. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.01.016.

GONG Feng-yuan,Dang Zi-yi,Huang Feng-yue,et al.Investigation of the Current Situation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss among Aviation Crews[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(01):58-60. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.01.016.

摘要

目的

探究噪声接触时长对听觉功能的影响，分析不同工龄航空机务人员的高频听力变化，明确噪声性听力损失的演变状况。

方法

依据工龄时间将187例男性航空机务人员分为0～5年（97例）、6～10年（43例）、>10年（47例） 3组，进行纯音听力测试，分析各组单耳高频、双耳高频噪声性听力损失的发生率、高频平均听阈及听力损失演变情况。

结果

0～5年工龄组听力损失者26例，高频平均听阈为15.99±11.42 dB，单耳高频听力损失者12例，双耳高频听力损失者14例。6～10年工龄组听力损失者12例，高频平均听阈为 15.90±10.89 dB，单耳高频听力损失者7例，双耳高频听力损失者5例。>10年工龄组听力损失者16例，高频平均听阈为20.56±12.61 dB，单耳高频听力损失者5例，双耳高频听力损失者11例。

结论

航空机务人员噪声性听力损失的发病率并未随工作时间延长而增加，高频气导平均听阈与工作时间呈显著相关性，发病多以单耳6 kHz开始，逐渐向其他高频扩展，随着噪声接触延长而发展为双耳噪声性聋且噪声性听力损失的程度逐渐加重。

Abstract

Objective

Explore the impact of noise exposure duration on auditory function

analyze the high-frequency hearing changes of aviation crews with different service years

and clarify the evolution of noise-induced hearing loss.

Methods

187 male aviation crews were divided into three groups based on their length of service

and pure tone hearing test was conducted to analyze the incidence of single ear high-frequency and binaural high-frequency noise-induced hearing loss

high-frequency average hearing threshold

and evolution of hearing loss in each group.

Results

There were 26 cases of hearing loss in the 0-5 year working group

with a high-frequency Pure-tone average of 15.99 ± 11.42 dB

including 12 cases of high-frequency hearing loss in one ear and 14 cases of high-frequency hearing loss in both ears. Among the 43 cases with 6-10 years of work experience

there were 12 cases of hearing loss

with a high-frequency Pure-tone average of 15.90 ± 10.89 dB

including 7 cases of high-frequency hearing loss in one ear and 5 cases of high-frequency hearing loss in both ears. Among the 47 cases with over 10 years of work experience

there were 16 cases of hearing loss

with a high-frequency Pure-tone average of 20.56 ± 12.61 dB

including 5 cases of high-frequency hearing loss in the monaural and 11 cases of high-frequency hearing loss in the binaural.

Conclusion

The incidence rate of noise-induced hearing loss in aviation crew did not increase with the working time. The average hearing threshold of high-frequency air conduction was significantly correlated with the working time. The onset of noise-induced hearing loss began at 6 kHz in monaural

and gradually extended to other high frequencies. With the extension of noise exposure

it developed into binaural noise-induced hearing loss and the degree of noise-induced hearing loss gradually increased.

关键词

航空机务人员听觉功能纯音测听噪声性聋

Keywords

Aviation crewsAuditory functionPure tone audiometryNoise-induced hearing loss

references

Ding T, Yan A, Liu K. What is noise-induced hearing loss?[J]. Br J Hosp Med (Lond), 2019, 80(9): 525-529.

Chen KH, Su SB, Chen KT. An overview of occupational noise-induced hearing loss among workers: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and preventive measures[J]. Environ Health Prev Med, 2020, 25(1): 65-75.

燕志强,郑桐,孙岩,等. 军事噪声性耳聋患者心理状况及影响因素分析[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2023, 21(02): 222-226.

Raja RV, Rajasekaran V, Sriraman G. Non-auditory Effects of Noise Pollution on Health: A Perspective[J]. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2019, 71(Suppl 2): 1500-1501.

E van Kempen, Babisch W. The quantitative relationship between road traffic noise and hypertension: a meta-analysis[J]. J Hypertens, 2012, 30(6): 1075-1086.

BCJ Moore. Diagnosis and quantification of military noise-induced hearing loss[J]. J Acoust Soc Am, 2020, 148(2): 884.

I Varela-Nieto, Murillo-Cuesta S, Calvino M, et al. Drug development for noise-induced hearing loss[J]. Expert Opin Drug Discov, 2020, 15(12): 1457-1471.

Imam L, Hannan SA. Noise-induced hearing loss: a modern epidemic?[J]. Br J Hosp Med (Lond), 2017, 78(5): 286-290.

Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health[J]. Lancet, 2014, 383(9925): 1325-1332.

薛鑫淼,陈学敏,徐瑾,等. 噪声性耳聋相关易感基因的研究进展[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2020, 18(01): 168-173.

张杰,陈晓丽,高小丹,等. 军事飞行人员噪声性听力损失的研究进展[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2023, 21(4): 568-573.

Chadambuka A, Mususa F, Muteti S. Prevalence of noise induced hearing loss among employees at a mining industry in Zimbabwe[J]. Afr Health Sci, 2013, 13(4): 899-906.

C-G Le Prell. Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Using Investigational Medicines for the Inner Ear: Previous Trial Outcomes Should Inform Future Trial Design[J]. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2022, 36(16-18): 1171-1202.

Hullfish H, Roldan LP, Hoffer ME. The Use of Antioxidants in the Prevention and Treatment of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2022, 55(5): 983-991.

卢佩恒,袁浩,钱明锋,等. 某场站机务人员噪声性听力损失现况调查及危险因素分析[J]. 空军军医大学学报, 2022, 43(09): 1027-1030.

Berg RL, Pickett W, Linneman JG, et al. Asymmetry in noise-induced hearing loss: evaluation of two competing theories[J]. Noise Health, 2014, 16(69): 102-107.

Le TN, Straatman LV, Lea J, et al. Current insights in noise-induced hearing loss: a literature review of the underlying mechanism, pathophysiology, asymmetry, and management options[J]. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017, 46(1): 41-56.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

全程健康教育对人工耳蜗植入儿童的康复效果分析