浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.上海市松江区九亭镇社区卫生服务中心 上海 201615
2.复旦大学附属华东医院耳鼻喉科 上海 200040
3.中国听力语言康复研究中心 北京 100029
4.复旦大学附属华东医院上海市老年医学临床重点实验室 上海 200040
杨建宏 本科 主治医师;研究方向:社区听力康复服务模式构建
鲁秀玲 本科 主管护师;研究方向:听力和认知评估技术
李红涛,E-mail:lihongtao3028@163.com
张敏,E-mail:miz18@pitt.edu
纸质出版日期:2023-11-15,
收稿日期:2023-08-15,
移动端阅览
杨建宏,鲁秀玲,吴婷婷等.关于社区听障老年人对国产助听器第一印象的调查研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(06):590-596.
YANG Jian-hong,LU Xiu-ling,WU Ting-ting,et al.A Survey on the First Impression of Domestic Hearing Aids among Community-Dwelling Elderly with Hearing Loss in China[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(06):590-596.
杨建宏,鲁秀玲,吴婷婷等.关于社区听障老年人对国产助听器第一印象的调查研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(06):590-596. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.06.010.
YANG Jian-hong,LU Xiu-ling,WU Ting-ting,et al.A Survey on the First Impression of Domestic Hearing Aids among Community-Dwelling Elderly with Hearing Loss in China[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(06):590-596. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.06.010.
目的
2
调查社区老年人对国产助听器的初步印象,探讨应用国产助听器在社区层面推广老年人听力健康的前景。
方法
2
选取188名上海和北京普通社区60岁以上老年人(健听组30名,听障组158名),完成听力和认知功能评估后,根据其听力状况给予国产助听器试听和试操作,并请其对3种常规外型助听器(盒式机、耳背机和耳道机)从感观、感受、价格等方面进行量化评价,分析调查结果。
结果
2
调查项以100分为最高评分,社区老人对国产助听器的易操作性、清晰度和音质均分为90分,外观评分中耳道机评分最高,约85分。社区老人对助听器带来正面感受(能促进与人相处和能让生活更容易)的认同程度超过95分,对负面感受(丢人、恶心、烦躁)的认同程度低于10分。84%的听障老人和87%的健听老人在考虑配戴助听器对会优先选择耳道机。健听组对实验助听器价格的估计更接近其真实价格,听障组的价格估计偏高,更接近经济型进口助听器价格。近70%的老人对配戴助听器仍然心存顾虑,但健听老人和听障老人的顾虑稍有不同。在主动配戴助听器的时间节点上,53%的健听老人选择中度听力下降时配戴,而57%的听障老人选择重度听力下降时配戴。所有受试者均赞同在社区医院为老人开展听力干预服务。
结论
2
我国自主研发主控芯片的助听器能够满足社区听障老人的听力康复需求,具有推广应用的价值和前景。同时,减少老年人配戴助听器的顾虑,并将其主动听力健康的时间节点前移,需要助听科技进一步的发展和更加广泛深入的听力健康教育。
Objective
2
To investigating the initial impression of Chinese domestic hearing aids among elderly people in the community.
Methods
2
A total of 188 elderly residents aged 60 and above from typical communities in Shanghai and Beijing participated in the study. The normal hearing (NH) group consists of 30 participants
and the hearing loss (HL) group consists of 158 participants. Following a battery of audiological assessments
the participants were given minutes of trial hearing aids experience and hearing aid operation experience
meanwhile
they completed a hearing aid judgement survey.
Results
2
Participants gave an average score of 90 points for the ease of operation
clarity
and sound quality of domestic hearing aids (the highest score for the survey item was 100). The in-the-canal hearing aids received a higher score compared to the body-wear and behind-the-ear hearing aids. Both groups rated over 95 points for the potential positive impact brought by hearing aids
while less than 10 points for the potential negative impacts. The in-the-canal hearing aids were rated as the priory choice by over 80% of the participants. The price estimation from the NH group was closer to the actual price than from the HL group. Nearly 70% of the elderly still have concerns about wearing hearing aids
but the concerns of two groups were slightly different. 53% of the NH group chose to wear hearing aids when they have "moderate hearing loss"
while 57% of the HL group chose to wear them when they have "severe hearing loss". All participants supported that community hospitals provide hearing intervention services for the elderly.
Conclusion
2
The Chinese domestic hearing aids are able to meet the needs of elderly people with hearing loss in communities. Further development of hearing aid technology and more extensive and in-depth hearing health education are required to reduce the concerns about wearing hearing aids and facilitate proactive hearing health seeking.
国产助听器社区老年人听力下降
Domestic hearing aidsCommunity-dwelling elderlyHearing loss
Chou YC, Tsou HH, Chan DD, et al. Validation of clinical frailty scale in Chinese translation[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2022. 22(1): 604-609.
Panza F, Lozupone M, Sardone R, et al. Sensorial frailty: age-related hearing loss and the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in later life[J]. Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2019, 9(10): 1-17.
Kamil RJ, Betz J, Powers BB, et al. Association of Hearing Impairment with Incident Frailty and Falls in Older Adults[J]. J Aging Health, 2015, 28(4): 644-660.
Kamil RJ, Li L,Lin FR. Association between hearing impairment and frailty in older adults[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2014, 62(6): 1186-1188.
Kojima G. Frailty as a Predictor of Future Falls Among Community-Dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2015, 16(12): 1027-1033.
Ensrud KE, Ewing SK, Taylor BC, et al. Comparison of 2 frailty indexes for prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and death in older women[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2008, 168(4): 382-389.
Kojima G.Frailty as a predictor of disabilities among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2017, 39(19): 1897-1908.
Kojima G. Frailty as a predictor of hospitalisation among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2016, 70(7): 722-729.
Rockwood K, Song XW, Macknight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people[J]. Cmaj, 2005, 173(5): 489-495.
张华, 王硕, 王靓, 等. 普通话言语测听双音节词表的编辑与初步等价性评估[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2006, 41(6): 425-429.
Dias JW, Mcclaskey CM, Harris KC. Time-Compressed Speech Identification Is Predicted by Auditory Neural Processing, Perceptuomotor Speed, and Executive Functioning in Younger and Older Listeners[J]. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2019, 20(1): 73-88.
Arons B. Techniques, perception, and applications of time-compressed speech[R]. in Proceedings of 1992 Conference. 1992.169-177.
张华, 陈静, 王硕,等. 汉语普通话语句测听句表的编辑与评估[D]. 2005.
Henkin Y, Yaar-Soffer Y, Gilat S, et al. Auditory conflict processing: behavioral and electrophysiologic manifestations of the stroop effect[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2010, 21(7): 474-486.
Morgan AL, Brandt JF. An auditory Stroop effect for pitch, loudness, and time[J]. Brain and language, 1989, 36(4): 592-603.
肖少北, 刘海燕. 听障儿童听觉Stroop效应的研究综述[J]. 中国特殊教育, 2011, (12): 58-61.
Knoetze M, Manchaiah V, Mothemeta B, et al. Factors Influencing Hearing Help-Seeking and Hearing Aid Uptake in Adults: A Systematic Review of the Past Decade[J]. Trends Hear, 2023, 27: 1-24.
Knudsen LV, Oberg M, Nielsen C, et al. Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature[J]. Trends Amplif, 2010. 14(3):127-154.
Zhao F, Manchaiah V, Claire L, et al. Exploring the influence of culture on hearing help-seeking and hearing-aid uptake. International Journal of Audiology, 2015, 54(7): 435-443.
He P, Wen X, Hu X, et al. Hearing Aid Acquisition in Chinese Older Adults With Hearing Loss[J]. Am J Public Health, 2018, 108(2):241-247.
梁巍. 提升全民健康素养 促进主动听力健康——写在第24次全国“爱耳日”之际[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2023. 21(02): 113-116.
Simpson AN, Matthews LJ, Cassarly C, et al. Time From Hearing Aid Candidacy to Hearing Aid Adoption: A Longitudinal Cohort Study[J]. Ear Hear, 2019, 40(3): 468-476.
Ferguson MA, Kitterick PT, Chong LY, et al. Hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults[J]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017, 9(9): 1-9.
Glick HA, Sharma A.Cortical Neuroplasticity and Cognitive Function in Early-Stage, Mild-Moderate Hearing Loss: Evidence of Neurocognitive Benefit from Hearing Aid Use[J]. Front Neurosci, 2020, 14(3): 1-22.
Ferschneider M, Moulin A. Listening Effort in Quiet and Noisy Environments in the Daily Life of Adults with Hearing Aids: An Extended Version of the Effort Assessment Scale (EEAS)[J]. Trends Hear, 2023, 27(5): 1-20.
Ma L, Tang Zh, Zhang L, et al. Prevalence of frailty and associated factors in the community‐dwelling population of China[J]. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2018, 66(3): 559-564.
Mendelson J, Ricketts C.Age-related temporal processing speed deterioration in auditory cortex[J]. Hearing research, 2001, 158(1-2): 84-94.
von Bastian CC, Reihartz A, Udale RC, et al.Mechanisms of processing speed training and transfer effects across the adult lifespan: protocol of a multi-site cognitive training study[J]. BMC Psychol, 2022, 10(1):1-17.
0
浏览量
45
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构