助听器效果评估方法的研究进展

唐菲; 杨崇灵; 曹伟; 刘昭颖; 吕萍; 刘军

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.05.014

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

助听器效果评估方法的研究进展

综述 | 更新时间：2023-11-03

- 助听器效果评估方法的研究进展
- Research Progress on Evaluation Methods for Hearing Aids Effectiveness
- 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 2023年21卷第5期页码：503-507
- 作者机构：
  
  1.解放军总医院第六医学中心耳鼻咽喉头颈外科医学部/国家耳鼻咽喉疾病临床医学研究中心北京 100048
  2.解放军总医院第七医学中心耳鼻咽喉头颈外科北京 100700
  3.川北医学院/川北医学院附属医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科南充 637000
- 作者简介：
  
  唐菲在读硕士；研究方向：临床听力学，人工耳蜗植入术前筛查及疗效评估
  刘军，E-mail：liujunent@126.com
- 基金信息：
  
  北京市科技计划首都市民健康项目培育基金(Z131100004013019);解放军总医院临床科研扶持基金课题(2012FC-TSYS-4017);解放军总医院科技创新基金项目(06ZY13)
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.05.014
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版日期：2023-09-15，
  
  收稿日期：2023-07-03，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
唐菲,杨崇灵,曹伟等.助听器效果评估方法的研究进展[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(05):503-507.

TANG Fei,YANG Chong-ling,CAO Wei,et al.Research Progress on Evaluation Methods for Hearing Aids Effectiveness[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(05):503-507.
唐菲,杨崇灵,曹伟等.助听器效果评估方法的研究进展[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(05):503-507. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.05.014.

TANG Fei,YANG Chong-ling,CAO Wei,et al.Research Progress on Evaluation Methods for Hearing Aids Effectiveness[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(05):503-507. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.05.014.

摘要

助听器是提高耳聋患者听力常用且安全的方法之一，但助听效果存在个体差异，与患者的自身条件、助听器品牌和型号、使用时间和频率、验配调试技术等诸多因素有关，助听效果评估是否准确至关重要。助听器效果的评估方法主要包括听力学检查和问卷评估，涉及可听度、可懂度、满意度及心理情绪等多个方面。对于婴幼儿、低龄儿童及不能配合作出反应的成人，真耳分析（real-ear measurement，REM）、皮层听觉诱发电位（CAEP）和声场多频稳态诱发电位（ASSR）是重要的客观评估方法。本文总结助听器效果评估的各种方法，为准确、全面评估助听效果，优化临床听力康复提供理论依据。

Abstract

Hearing aids are one of the most commonly used and safest ways to improve hearing

but there are individual differences in hearing aid effectiveness and factors such as the patient's own condition

brand and model of hearing aids

frequency and duration of use

and fitting and calibration techniques. It is also crucial to accurately evaluate the effectiveness of hearing aids. Evaluation methods include audiological evaluation and subjective questionnaire evaluation

which need to be comprehensively evaluated from the aspects of audibility

intelligibility

satisfaction

and psychological emotions. For infants

young children

and elderly individuals who cannot cooperate to provide responses

Real-ear measurement (REM)

Cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are important objective evaluation methods for hearing aid effectiveness. This article summarizes the methods for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing aids

providing a theoretical basis for accurate and comprehensive evaluation of hearing aids and optimizing clinical hearing rehabilitation.

关键词

助听器耳聋气传导骨传导效果评估

Keywords

Hearing aidsDeafnessAir conductionBone conductionEffectivenessEvaluation

references

Chadha S, Kamenov K, Cieza A. The world report on hearing [J]. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2021, 99(4): 242-242A.

胡向阳, 郑晓瑛, 马芙蓉, 等. 我国四省听力障碍流行现况调查[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(11): 819-825.

第二次全国残疾人抽样调查领导小组, 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 2006年第二次全国残疾人抽样调查主要数据公报[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2006, 12(12): 1013-1013.

Ferguson MA, Kitterick PT, Chong LY, et al. Hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults[J]. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017, 9(9): CD012023.

McCormack A, Fortnum H. Why do people fitted with hearing aids not wear them?[J]. International journal of audiology, 2013, 52(5): 360-368.

Wang X, Zheng Y, Liu Y, et al. Effects of demographic, audiologic, and hearing-aid-related variables on the outcomes of using hearing aids[J]. European archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2022, 279(8): 3857-3865.

Stroebel D, Swanepoel DW, Groenewald E. Aided auditory steady-state responses in infants[J]. International journal of audiology, 2007, 46(6): 287-292.

Zapata-Rodriguez V, Laugesen S, Jeong CH, et al. Do Room Acoustics Affect the Amplitude of Sound-Field Auditory Steady-State Responses?[J].Trends in Hearing, 2021, 25(6):716-723.

Tufatulin GS. The optimal stimulation parameters of the free-field auditory steady-state responses[J]. Vestnik otorinolaringologii, 2020, 85(5): 18-23.

冀飞, 陈艾婷. 助听器验配中的真耳分析[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2019, 17(05): 389-391.

Kodera K, Hosoi H, Okamoto M, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010)[J]. Auris, nasus, larynx, 2016, 43(3): 217-228.

Soli SD, Wong LLN. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the Hearing in Noise Test[J]. International journal of audiology, 2008, 47(6): 356-361.

Nabelek AK, Freyaldenhoven MC, Tampas JW, et al. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2006, 17(9): 626-639.

Ahmadi R, Jalilvand H, Mahdavi ME, et al. The Effects of Hearing Aid Digital Noise Reduction and Directionality on Acceptable Noise Level[J]. Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology, 2018, 11(4): 267-274.

Moore R, Gordon-Hickey S, Jones A. Most comfortable listening levels, background noise levels, and acceptable noise levels for children and adults with normal hearing[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2011, 22(5): 286-293.

Chen J, Zhang H, Plyler PN, et al. Development and evaluation of the Mandarin speech signal content on the acceptable noise level test in listeners with normal hearing in mainland China[J]. International journal of audiology, 2011, 50(6): 354-360.

Carter L, Dillon H, Seymour J, et al. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2013, 24(9): 807-822.

Baydan M, Batuk MO, Sennaroglu G. Relationship between aided cortical auditory evoked responses and aided behavioral thresholds[J]. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 2019, 125(5): 98-102.

Van Dun B , Carter L , Dillon H .Sensitivity of cortical auditory evoked potential detection for hearing-impaired infants in response to short speech sounds[J].Audiology Research, 2012, 2(1):65-76.

Naatanen R.Mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of central auditory system plasticity[J]. International journal of audiology,2008, 47(Suppl.2):S16-20.

Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 1997, 8(1): 27-43.

Gatehouse S, Noble W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)[J]. International journal of audiology, 2004, 43(2): 85-99.

Akeroyd MA, Guy FH, Harrison DL, et al. A factor analysis of the SSQ (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale)[J]. International journal of audiology, 2014, 53(2): 101-114.

Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit[J]. Ear and hearing, 1995, 16(2): 176-186.

Newman CW, Weinstein BE. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly as a measure of hearing aid benefit[J]. Ear and hearing, 1988, 9(2): 81-85.

Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: a new tool[J]. Ear and hearing, 1982, 3(3): 128-134.

Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: the SADL scale[J]. Ear and hearing, 1999, 20(4): 306-320.

李玉玲, 张华, 傅新星, 等. 日常生活助听满意度问卷中文版信度和效度评价[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2017, 31(20):1554-1557.

Leijon A, Dillon H, Hickson L, et al. Analysis of data from the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) using Bayesian Item Response Theory[J]. International journal of audiology, 2021, 60(2): 81-88.

Cox RM, Stephens D, Kramer SE. Translations of the International Outcome inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)[J]. International journal of audiology, 2002, 41(1): 3-26.

Huh M. The relationships between cognitive function and hearing loss among the elderly[J]. Journal of physical therapy science, 2018, 30(1): 174-176.

Hélène Amieva, Ouvrard C. Does Treating Hearing Loss in Older Adults Improve Cognitive Outcomes? A Review[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2020, 9(3): 805-805.

Bingham K, Jenstad LM, Shahnaz N. Longitudinal changes in real-ear to coupler difference measurements in infants[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2009, 20(9): 558-568.

Billings CJ, Penman TM, McMillan GP, et al. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age[J]. Ear and hearing, 2015, 36(6): 710-722.

Ching TYC, Hill M. The Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) scale: normative data[J]. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2007, 18(3): 220-235.

McCreery RW, Walker EA, Spratford M, et al. Speech Recognition and Parent Ratings From Auditory Development Questionnaires in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing[J]. Ear and hearing, 2015, 36(Suppl.1): 60S-75S.

Robbins AM, Renshaw JJ, Berry SW. Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children[J]. The American journal of otology,1991,12(Suppl): 144-150.

Yang F, Zhao F, Zheng Y, et al. Modification and verification of the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale: a psychometric analysis combining item response theory with classical test theory[J]. Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020, 18(1): 367-367.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

老年听力损失患者配戴助听器满意度调查及其影响因素分析

助听器配戴对听配能随任务变化趋势的影响

老年性听力损失患者助听器配戴效果研究进展

单侧声带麻痹的临床疗效评估及研究进展

人工耳蜗植入术前耳蜗神经及后通路功能评估