浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中国听力语言康复研究中心 北京 100029
2.《中国听力语言康复科学杂志》社 北京 100029
杨军 硕士 副主任医师;研究方向:听障儿童牙病
陈益青,E-mail:qsw6878@163.com
纸质出版日期:2023-09-15,
收稿日期:2023-01-08,
移动端阅览
杨军,朱晶,杨帆等.学龄前听障儿童口腔健康状况及龋病相关因素分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(05):500-502.
YANG Jun,ZHU Jing,YANG Fan,et al.The Analysis of Pre-School Deaf Children Oral Health Conditions and Caries Related Factors[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(05):500-502.
杨军,朱晶,杨帆等.学龄前听障儿童口腔健康状况及龋病相关因素分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(05):500-502. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.05.013.
YANG Jun,ZHU Jing,YANG Fan,et al.The Analysis of Pre-School Deaf Children Oral Health Conditions and Caries Related Factors[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(05):500-502. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.05.013.
目的
2
调查学龄前听障儿童口腔龋齿和口腔保健状况,分析听障儿童龋病相关影响因素。
方法
2
对115例听障儿童、156例健听儿童进行口腔检查,同时对107例听障儿童、163例健听儿童的监护人进行口腔问卷调查,建立数据库并用SPSS 23软件进行数据分析。
结果
2
听障儿童和健听儿童的龋均和患龋率无明显差异(
P
>
0.05);进食甜食率、饮用甜饮料率、睡前吃甜食率无明显差异(
P
>
0.05);在口腔保健知识方面,3项知识无差异(
P
>
0.05),1项知识有显著差异(
P
<
0.01);刷牙率、每天刷牙1次以上率、口腔诊疗率、应用含氟牙膏率有显著差异(
P
<
0.01)。
结论
2
听障儿童和健听儿童患龋严重程度差别不明显。二者饮用甜食的习惯无显著差异;听障儿童监护人对口腔保健知识存在不足;听障儿童的口腔保健行为较健康儿童差。
Objective
2
To investigate the oral caries' and the oral health care's conditions of pre-school deaf children and analyze caries related factors among deaf children.
Method
2
To check caries of 115 deaf children and 156 health children and questionnaire surveys were promoted among guardians of 107 deaf children and 163 health children
SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data.
Results
2
There are no significant differences in the DMFTs and rate of caries between deaf children and health children (
P
>
0.05).There are no significant differences in the DMFTs and rate of caries between deaf children and health children. There are no significant differences in the rate of sugar intake
sugar drink intake and sugar food before sleeping (
P
>
0.05). In the aspect of 4 kinds of oral knowledge
there are no significant differences in 3 questionnaire surveys (
P
>
0.05)
but there are significant differences in 1 questionnaire survey (
P
<
0.01). There are significant differences in the rate of tooth brushing
1 time and more tooth brushing per day
tooth curing and usage of fluorine tooth paste (
P
<
0.01).
Conclusion
2
There are no differences between deaf children and health children in the aspect of tooth caries' severity.There are no difference in the habit of sweet food intake between 2 groups. The knowledge of oral health care is poorer in guardians of deaf children. Deaf children perform poorer in the aspect of oral health behavior compared with health children.
听障儿童患龋率龋均口腔保健
Deaf childrenCaries rateDecayed missing and filled toothOral health care
Prashanth ST,Bhatnagar S,Das UM,et al. Oral health knowledge,practice,oral hygiene status, and dental caries prevalence amongvisually impaired children in Bangalore[J]. Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 2011, 29(2): 102-105.
Milgrom PM, Huebner CE, Ly KA. Fluoridated toothpaste and the prevention of early childhood caries: a failure to meet the needs of our young[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2009, 140(6): 628-631.
Doichinova L, Peneva M. Oral hygiene status of children with impaired hearing[J]. Problems of Dental Medicine, 2011, 37(1): 26-31.
宋蕾, 曹莉, 杨凡云, 等. 42例3~6岁听障儿童语言功能发展评估研究[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2016, 14(03): 118-191.
Weiss CE, Lilly white,Herold S, et al. Clinical Management of Articulatory and Phonologic Disorders[M]. Second Edition. Hagerstown, Maryland, USA: Williams & Wilkins, 1987. 54-56.
尹敏敏, 葛胜男, 邱卓.运用世界卫生组织国际分类家族构建儿童构音障碍诊断、评估和整体康复方案[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2020, 1(26):28-36.
0
浏览量
81
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构