浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
重庆两江新区人民医院耳鼻喉科 重庆 401121
胡谊容本科 副主任医师;研究方向:耳鼻咽喉临床研究,E-mail:liao82h@163.com
纸质出版日期:2023-05-15,
收稿日期:2021-12-15,
移动端阅览
胡谊容,田松明,王平等.功能性构音障碍儿童音位对比式言语识别能力及语言呼吸功能研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(03):302-305.
HU Yi-rong,TIAN Song-ming,WANG Ping,et al.The Research on Phonemic Contrastive Speech Recognition Ability and Speech Breathing Function of Children with Functional Articulation Disorder[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(03):302-305.
胡谊容,田松明,王平等.功能性构音障碍儿童音位对比式言语识别能力及语言呼吸功能研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(03):302-305. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.03.020.
HU Yi-rong,TIAN Song-ming,WANG Ping,et al.The Research on Phonemic Contrastive Speech Recognition Ability and Speech Breathing Function of Children with Functional Articulation Disorder[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(03):302-305. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.03.020.
目的
2
分析功能性构音障碍儿童音位对比式言语识别能力及语言呼吸功能,探索其与构音障碍程度的相关性。
方法
2
选择2020年7月~2021年8月我院收治的46例功能性构音障碍儿童为病例组,同期选择我院体检正常的46例儿童为对照组。对比分析两组儿童的音位对比式言语识别能力和语言呼吸功能,使用Pearson相关分析功能性构音障碍儿童音位对比式言语识别能力和语言呼吸功能与构音障碍程度的关联性。
结果
2
病例组韵母评分(前鼻韵母-后鼻韵母、同开口同结构、同开口异结构、同结构异开口、总分)及声母评分(同部位异方式、卷舌音-非卷舌音、送气音-不送气音、声母总分)均显著低于对照组(
P
<0.05)。病例组最长发声时间(maximum phonation time,MPT)、最大数数能力(maximum count ability,MCA)、平均气流量(mean air flowrate,MAF)均显著低于对照组,s/z比值显著高于对照组(
P
<0.05)。病例组同开口同结构、同开口异结构、同结构异开口、韵母总分、同部位异方式、清辅音-浊辅音、擦音-无擦音、送气音-不送气音、声母总分、MPT、MFR和MCA均与构音障碍程度存在负相关,s/z比值与构音障碍程度存在正相关(
P
<0.05)。
结论
2
与同龄正常儿童相比,功能性构音障碍儿童的音位对比式言语识别能力及语言呼吸功能均相对较低,其言语识别能力及语言呼吸功能均与构音障碍程度存在负相关,临床应加强音位对比式言语识别能力及语言呼吸功能训练。
Objective
2
To explore the phonemic contrastive speech recognition ability and speech breathing function of children with functional articulation disorder
and to explore the correlation between them and the degree of articulation disorder.
Methods
2
Children with functional articulation disorder admitted to our hospital from July 2020 to August 2021 were selected as the case group (functional articulation disorder
n=46)
and 46 children with normal physical examination in our hospital were selected as the control group (normal children
n=46). The phonemic contrastive speech recognition ability and speech breathing function of the two groups were compared and analyzed
and Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between phonemic contrastive speech recognition ability and speech breathing function of the children with functional articulation disorder and the degree of articulation disorder.
Results
2
Vowel scores (front nasal vowel-back nasal vowel score
same opening and same structure score
same opening and different structure score
same structure and different opening score
total vowel score) and initial consonant scores (same parts and different ways score
retroflex-non-retroflex score
aspirates-unaspirated sound score and total consonant score) in the case group were lower than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05). The maximum phonation time (MPT)
mean flow rate (MFR) and maximum counting ability (MCA) in the case group were lower than those in the control group
and the s/z ratio was higher than that in the control group (
P
<
0.05). Same opening and same structure score
same opening and different structure score
same structure and different opening score
total vowel score
same parts and different ways score
voiceless consonant and voiced consonant
fricative and non-fricative
aspirates-unaspirated sound score and total consonant score
MPT
MFR and MCA were negatively correlated with articulation disorder
while s/z ratio was positively correlated with the articulation disorder degree (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Compared with age-matched normal children
the phonemic contrastive speech recognition ability and speech breathing function of children with functional articulation disorder are relatively low
and speech recognition ability and speech breathing function of children is negatively correlated with articulation disorder degree. Children with functional articulation disorder should be trained in the phonemic contrastive speech recognition and speech breathing.
功能性构音障碍音位对比言语识别能力语言呼吸功能
Functional articulation disorderPhonemic contrastSpeech recognition abilitySpeech breathing function
王涛,徐丽娜,李峰. 功能性构音障碍患者侧化构音特点分析及语音训练疗效观察[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2020,42(1):40-43.
屈青青,刘维琳,李兴珊. 汉语言语产生的语音加工单元——基于音位的研究[J]. 心理科学进展,2018,26(9):1535-1544.
肖永涛,陈倩怡,陈飞帆.听障儿童嗓音与言语呼吸能力的相关性研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2019,17(2):117-119.
汪向东,王希林.心理卫生评定量表手册[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.207-208.
孙喜斌,刘巧云,黄昭鸣.听觉功能评估标准与方法[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2007.27-30.
徐琳宏,林鸿飞,祁瑞华,等. 基于部首和音位的情感词汇表示模型[J]. 中文信息学报,2018,32(6):124-131.
Rampello L, Rampello L, Patti F, et al. When the word doesn't come out: A synthetic overview of dysarthria[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2016,369(8):354-360.
徐琳宏,林鸿飞,祁瑞华,等. 基于部首和音位的情感词汇表示模型[J]. 中文信息学报,2018,32(6):124-131.
刘巧云,王丹,赵航,等. 听障儿童听觉分辨能力训练[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2015,13(1):66-68.
Gósy M, Horváth V. Speech processing in children with functional articulation disorders[J]. Clin Linguist Phon, 2015,29(3):185-200.
杨文竹,赵云静,张成惠. 功能性构音障碍儿童与正常儿童的音位对比式言语识别能力的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2015,23(10):1027-1029,1033.
Gilman M, Maira C, Hapner ER. Airflow Patterns of Running Speech in Patients With Voice Disorders[J]. J Voice, 2019,33(3):277-283.
Connaghan KP, Moore CA, Higashakawa M. Respiratory kinematics during vocalization and nonspeech respiration in children from 9 to 48 months[J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2004 ,47(1):70-84.
刘文龙,江瑞芬,刘雪芳.功能性构音障碍儿童与正常儿童言语呼吸功能及口腔轮替运动速率的对比研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2013,21(9):929-934.
王永华,黄学军,张梅丽,等. 听觉言语障碍儿童言语时呼吸特征研究[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志,2012,20(3):272-274.
张金爽,胡阿旭,于洪志. 呼吸生理在言语声学中的应用研究[J]. 生命科学仪器,2010,8(6):31-34.
0
浏览量
126
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构