浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
邢台医学高等专科学校第二附属医院 邢台 054000
吴丽英 本科 主管护师;研究方向:儿童语言康复
李永强,E-mail:w13932968216@126.com
纸质出版日期:2023-03-15,
收稿日期:2021-08-26,
移动端阅览
吴丽英,宋晓英,马晨红等.早期综合干预对语言发育迟缓儿童 康复效果的影响[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(02):196-199.
WU Li-ying,SONG Xiao-ying,MA Chen-hong,et al.Effects of Early Rehabilitation Intervention on the Children with Language Retardation[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(02):196-199.
吴丽英,宋晓英,马晨红等.早期综合干预对语言发育迟缓儿童 康复效果的影响[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(02):196-199. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.02.020.
WU Li-ying,SONG Xiao-ying,MA Chen-hong,et al.Effects of Early Rehabilitation Intervention on the Children with Language Retardation[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(02):196-199. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.02.020.
目的
2
探讨早期综合干预对语言发育迟缓儿童语言、社会行为及适应能力的改善效果。
方法
2
择取2020年3月至2021年3月我院收治的语言发育迟缓患儿102例,随机分为研究组和对照组各51例。对照组进行常规康复干预,研究组在对照组基础上进行早期综合干预,干预3个月。采用S-S语言发育迟缓评价法、婴儿-初中生社会生活能力量表对患儿语言水平、社会行为能力及社会适应能力及家长满意度进行评估。
结果
2
研究组干预后语言理解能力、表达能力、基本操作能力及交流态度异常率均低于对照组,差异无统计学意义(
P
>0.05)。研究组干预后独立生活能力、运动能力、作业操作情况、交往情况、集体活动能力、自我管理能力评分均显著高于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。研究组干预后概念技能、社会技能、实用技能评分均显著高于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。研究组家长总满意度为88.24%,显著高于对照组的70.59%(
P
<0.05)。
结论
2
早期综合干预有利于促进语言发育迟缓患儿语言发育,提高其社会行为和适应能力,进而更好地融入社会。
Objective
2
To explore the effect of early rehabilitation intervention on language
social behavior and adaptability of children with language retardation.
Methods
2
102 children with language retardation admitted to the hospital from March 2020 to March 2021 were selected for observation and randomly divided into the study group and the control group
with 51 cases in each group. The control group received routine rehabilitation intervention
while the study group received early comprehensive intervention on the basis of the control group for 3 months. The language level was assessed by the S-S language retardation assessment method by the qualified speech therapist. The infant junior middle school student social life ability scale was used to investigate the children and their families
and to evaluate the social behavior ability of the children. The adaptive behavior assessment system second edition scale was used to evaluate the children's social adaptability. After the intervention
the family members of the children evaluated the satisfaction of the rehabilitation intervention process and calculated the total satisfaction.
Results
2
After the intervention
the abnormal rates of language comprehension
language expression
basic operation and communication attitude in the study group were lower than those in the control group
but the difference was not statistically significant (
P
>
0.05). After the intervention
the scores of independent living ability
exercise ability
operation
communication
collective activity ability and self-management ability of the study group were significantly higher than those of the control group (
P
<
0.05). After the intervention
the scores of concept skills
social skills and practical skills in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05). The total satisfaction of parents in the study group was 88.24%
which was significantly higher than 70.59% in the control group (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Early comprehensive intervention is beneficial to promote the language development of children with language retardation
improve their social behavior and adaptability
and then make them better integrate into the normal social group.
语言发育迟缓早期康复干预语言水平社会行为能力社会适应能力
Language retardationEarly rehabilitation interventionLanguage levelSocial behavior abilitySocial adaptability
葛庆云.早期康复护理干预在语言发育迟缓儿童中的疗效分析[J]. 中外女性健康研究, 2018, 49(13):71-72.
林爱兰, 陈少蓉. 语言干预对语言发育迟缓儿童社会适应能力改善的影响效果分析[J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2018, 11(32):133-134.
张桂芳, 海敬, 尚清. 早期康复护理干预在语言发育迟缓儿童中的应用效果观察[J]. 临床医学工程, 2018, 25(9):97-98.
Jibril YN, Adamu A, Jalo RI, et al. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission findings in children (1-12 years) with cerebral palsy in Kano, Nigeria[J]. Niger Postgrad Med J, 2020, 27(4):371-376.
栗书艳, 赵曙霞, 王海英.语言发育迟缓儿童的智能发育特征及相关因素分析[J].全科护理,2020,18(20):2585-2588.
梁静,王朝晖. S-S语言发育迟缓评价法与Gesell发育评估量表在幼儿语言评定应用中的对比[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2017,25(5):514-516.
顾红兵, 张凡, 王飞英,等. 先天性甲状腺功能减低症患儿社会生活能力及其影响因素的研究[J]. 南通大学学报(医学版), 2020,187(03):31-33.
李毓秋,邱卓英.适应性行为评定量表第二版中文版(儿童用)标准化研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,2016,22(4):378-382.
Southwood F,White MJ,Brookes H,et al.Sociocultural Factors Affecting Vocabulary Development in Young South African Children[J].Front Psychol,2021,12(11):642315.
曹芮,武彦秋,刘利蕊,等.探讨0-6岁儿童语言发育迟缓相关影响因素[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,19(20):150-151,153.
吴茜,陈忆晴,王玉荣.南京市幼托机构学龄前儿童语言发育现状及影响因素研究[J].华南预防医学,2020,46(1):46-49.
苏怡,谢芊芊,苏林雁.孤独症儿童、发育迟缓儿童和语言障碍儿童早期语言表达的异同[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2020,28(3):508-512,517.
孙殿荣,李欣,张雷红,等.语言发育迟缓儿童301例随访结局及早期发育特征分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2018,26(4):415-417.
姚丹,李芳芳,沈季阳,等.S-S语言发育迟缓检查法评估语言发育迟缓儿童发育特征的相关性研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2020,28(1):69-72.
尹晓,李玉.早期认知语言康复训练对发育迟缓患儿的影响[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2018, 12(2):125-128.
宋来丽.语言治疗师指导下家庭语言干预对发育迟缓儿童的影响[J].中国卫生标准管理, 2018, 9(6):51-52.
易泉英,郭翠华,谢桂芳.语言发育迟缓儿童的智能发育水平研究[J].中国实用医药,2020,15(2):31-33.
王慧琴.儿童语言发育迟缓93例发育水平与社会适应能力研究[J].中国药物与临床,2020,20(18):3050-3051.
0
浏览量
50
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构