中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表简化潜力研究

孙凯; 朱蓓; 杨建宏; 李红涛; 杨洋; 张敏; 白勇涛

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.02.009

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表简化潜力研究

临床研究 | 更新时间：2023-05-22

- 中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表简化潜力研究
- Exploring the Simplification Potential of the Chinese Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly-Screening
- 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 2023年21卷第2期页码：149-153
- 作者机构：
  
  1.中国听力语言康复研究中心北京 100029
  2.上海市松江区九亭镇社区卫生服务中心上海 201615
  3.复旦大学附属华东医院上海市老年医学临床重点实验室上海 200403
  4.北京市朝阳区太阳宫社区卫生服务中心北京 100020
- 作者简介：
  
  孙凯本科技师；研究方向：听力康复
  张敏，E-mail： miz18@pitt.edu
  白勇涛，E-mail： tracy_byt@126.com#为共同通讯作者
- 基金信息：
  
  中国残联课题残疾人辅助器具专项(2021CDPFAT-43)
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.02.009
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版日期：2023-03-15，
  
  收稿日期：2022-11-15，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
孙凯,朱蓓,杨建宏等.中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表简化潜力研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(02):149-153.

SUN Kai,ZHU Bei,YANG Jian-Hong,et al.Exploring the Simplification Potential of the Chinese Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly-Screening[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(02):149-153.
孙凯,朱蓓,杨建宏等.中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表简化潜力研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(02):149-153. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.02.009.

SUN Kai,ZHU Bei,YANG Jian-Hong,et al.Exploring the Simplification Potential of the Chinese Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly-Screening[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(02):149-153. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.02.009.

摘要

目的

简化中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表（hearing handicap inventory for elderly-screening， HHIE-S），分析完整版和简化版量表与纯音听阈结果的相关性。

方法

对北京和上海659例社区居民（北京173例，上海486例）发放完整版HHIE-S量表，对北京173位居民测试纯音听阈。采用限定性主成分分析法评估量表简化潜力并得到简化版HHIE-S量表，比较两个版本与纯音听阈间的相关性。

结果

① HHIE-S量表（10项）总得分、情绪维度（5项）、社交场景维度（5项）得分均与纯音听力阈值呈极显著相关（

＜0.001）；②HHIE-S量表限定性主成分分析结果显示，仅保留5个量表项目仍能保持80%量表可变性；③完整版和简化版HHIE-S量表得分与纯音听力阈值呈极显著相关性（

＜0.001）。

结论

中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表存在简化潜力，简化后量表保留原量表1、2、3、6、8题，仍与纯音听力阈值存在较好相关性。

Abstract

Objective

To shorten the length of the Chinese Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S)

and analyze the correlation between the full version HHIE-S score and the pure tone threshold and the correlation between the short version HHIE-S score and the pure tone threshold.

Methods

A total of 659 community geriatric residents (173 from Beijing

486 from Shanghai) completed the HHIE-S questionnaire

173 residents from Beijing also completed the pure tone audiometric test. A constrained principal component analysis was used to investigate the questionnaire's potential for shortening and remove redundant items. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the HHIE-S scores (full version and short version

respectively) and the pure tone average threshold.

Results

The HHIE-S (10 items) total score

the HHIE-S emotional (5 items) subscore

and the HHIE-S social (5 items) subscore were significantly correlated with pure tone threshold (

0.001); Results of the constrained principal component analysis showed that five items of the HHIE-S questionnaire could preserve about 80% of the questionnaire variability; Both full and short versions of HHIE-S scores displayed significant relationship with the pure tone thresholds (

0.001).

Conclusion

The Chinese version of HHIE-S has the potential to be simplified

and the simplified scale retains questions 1

6 and 8 of the original scale

but still has a good correlation with the pure tone hearing threshold.

关键词

老年人听力筛查量表简化限定性主成分分析

Keywords

Older adultHearing screeningQuestionnaire shorteningConstrained principal component analysis

references

于丽玫,孙喜斌,魏志云,等. 全国老年听力残疾人群现状调查研究[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2008,6(3):63-65.

刘丞,卜行宽,邢光前,等. 老年人听力减退和耳疾流行病学调查研究[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(09):661-664.

杜波,张岩,王宇声,等. 吉林省听力障碍及耳疾流行病学调查研究[J]. 中华耳科学杂志,2007,5(4):359-362.

宁吉吉吉.第七次全国人口普查主要数据情况[J].中国统计,2021, 473(05):4-5.

Gurgel RK, Ward PD, Schwartz S, et al. Relationship of hearing loss and dementia: A prospective, population-based study[J]. Otology and neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology,2014,35(5):775-781.

Frank RL, Kristine Y, Jin Xia, et al. Hearing Loss and Cognitive Decline in Older Adults[J]. JAMA internal medicine,2013,173(4):293-299.

Simpson AN, Matthews LJ, Cassarly C, et al. Time From Hearing Aid Candidacy to Hearing Aid Adoption: A Longitudinal Cohort Study[J]. Ear and hearing.,2019,40(3):468-476.

Morris A. An economic model of adult hearing screening[J]. Audiology Research,2011,1(16):61-63.

汪国庆,李朝军,官文君,等. 筛选型老年听力障碍量表的研译及其信度和效度评价[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志,2014,22(6):568-572.

余艳萍,于文永,杨向茹,等. 中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表评分与纯音听阈测试的比较研究[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志,2020,28(3):253-256.

Brosnan K,Gruen B,Dolnicar S.Identifying superfluous survey items[J].Journal of retailing and consumer services,2018,43(JULa):39-45.

ASHA. Guidelines for the identification of hearing impairment/handicap in adult/elderly persons[J]. ASHA,1989,31(8):59-63.

WHO.Report of the Informal Working Group on Prevention of Deafness and Hearing Impairing Program Planning[R].Geneva,1991.WHO/PDH/91.

Sindhusake D, Mitchell P, Smith W, et al. Validation of self-reported hearing loss. The Blue Mountains Hearing Study[J]. International Journal of Epidemiology,2001,30(6):1371-1378.

王越,莫玲燕,郑中伟,等.单句询问与中文版老年听力障碍筛查量表在社区50岁以上人群听力筛查中的应用[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2016,24(05):425-429.

蒋涛,邹凌.老年性听力损失和干预策略现状和新进展(1)[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2006,14(05):363-368,376.

Wallhagen MI,Strawbridge WJ.Hearing loss education for older adults in primary care clinics: Benefits of a concise educational brochure[J].Geriatric Nursing,2017,38(6):527-530.

浏览量

120

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

儿童语言障碍门诊中84例听力障碍病例特点分析

2098例学龄儿童语频区气导纯音听阈测定结果分析

苏州地区新生儿听力与耳聋基因联合筛查结果分析

噪声下数字言语测试联合听力障碍筛查量表在职业性噪声性听力损失患者中的应用