Comparison of the Effects of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation and Bimodal Intervention in Young Children with Prelingual Hearing Loss

CAI Ai-jun; LU Peng

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.04.011

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Comparison of the Effects of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation and Bimodal Intervention in Young Children with Prelingual Hearing Loss

Clinical Research | 更新时间：2026-07-14

- Comparison of the Effects of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation and Bimodal Intervention in Young Children with Prelingual Hearing Loss
- Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation Vol. 21, Issue 4, Pages: 377-381(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  邯郸市眼科医院（邯郸市第三医院）耳鼻咽喉头颈外科邯郸 056001
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.04.011
  CLC：
- Received：11 November 2022，
  
  Published：15 July 2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
蔡爱军,逯鹏.双侧人工耳蜗植入与双模式干预对低龄语前聋患者康复效果对比[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(04):377-381.

CAI Ai-jun,LU Peng.Comparison of the Effects of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation and Bimodal Intervention in Young Children with Prelingual Hearing Loss[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(04):377-381.
蔡爱军,逯鹏.双侧人工耳蜗植入与双模式干预对低龄语前聋患者康复效果对比[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(04):377-381. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.04.011.

CAI Ai-jun,LU Peng.Comparison of the Effects of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation and Bimodal Intervention in Young Children with Prelingual Hearing Loss[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(04):377-381. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.04.011.

摘要

目的

比较双侧人工耳蜗植入和双模式干预对低龄语前聋患儿的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析本院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科2019年7月～2021年6月收治的88例低龄语前聋患儿临床资料，根据干预方法分为A组（n=45）和B组（n=43），A组接受双侧人工耳蜗植入干预，B组接受一侧植入人工耳蜗、对侧配戴助听器干预。分别于开机前、开机6个月、12个月时采用婴幼儿有意义听觉整合量表（infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale，IT-MAIS）、简易版普通话早期言语感知测试（low-verbal mandarin early speech perception test，LV-MESP）评价患儿听觉能力和言语感知能力；采用言语空间听觉质量量表-父母版问卷（speech， spatial and other qualities of hearing scale for parents，SSQ-P）评价患儿空间听觉能力，采用中文版人工耳蜗植入儿童家长观点调查问卷（mandarin children with cochlear implants：parental perspectives，MPP）评价患儿生活质量。

结果

B组患儿开机6个月时的IT-MAIS和LV-MESP得分显著高于A组（

0.05），但两组开机12个月时的IT-MAIS和LV-MESP得分无显著差异（

＞0.05）。B组患儿开机6个月时SSQ-P量表中空间听力和听力质量维度评分显著高于A组（

0.05），两组患儿不同时间言语感知维度评分和开机12个月时的空间听力和听力质量维度评分比较均无显著差异（

＞0.05）。两组患儿开机12个月时的MPP量表各维度评分均无显著差异（

0.05）。

结论

双模式干预治疗低龄语前聋患儿的短期疗效优于双侧人工耳蜗植入，但二者长期干预效果接近，临床应根据手术风险、患儿是否为对称性耳聋、患儿家庭经济情况进行合理选择。

Abstract

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of bilateral cochlear implantation and bimodal intervention in the treatment of young patients with prelingual hearing loss.

Methods

The clinical data of 88 young children with presyllabic deafness admitted to our otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery department from July 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different intervention methods

they were divided into Group A (n=45) and group B (n=43). Children in Group A received bilateral cochlear implant intervention

while children in Group B received unilateral cochlear implant intervention and contralateral hearing aid intervention. The children's hearing and speech perception ability were evaluated with the Integrated Meaningful Auditory Scale for Infants (IT-MAIS) and the Simplified Mandarin Early Speech Perception Test (LV-MESP) before

6 months and 12 months after switch-on. The children's hearing and speech perception abilities were evaluated with the Speech Space Hearing Quality Scale Parent Parent Version Questionnaire (SSQ-P)

and the children's quality of life was evaluated with the Chinese version of CI Children's Parent Opinion Questionnaire (MPP).

Results

The percentage of IT-MAIS score and LV-MESP score in Group B were significantly higher than those in Group A at 6 months of boot (

0.05)

but there was no significant difference between the two groups at 12 months of boot (

0.05). The spatial hearing and hearing quality dimension scores of children in Group B were significantly higher than those in Group B after 6 months of boot (

0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in speech perception dimension scores at different times and spatial hearing and hearing quality dimension scores at 12 months of boot (

0.05). There was no significant difference between Group A and Group B in all dimensions of the MPP scale at 12 months (

0.05).

Conclusion

The short-term effect of bimodal intervention is slightly better than that of bilateral cochlear implantation in the treatment of young children with prelingual deafness

but the long-term effect of the two interventions is similar.Clinical selection should be made according to the surgical risk

whether the child is symmetrical deafness

and the family economic situation.

关键词

Keywords

references

贾欢 , 陈颖 , 张治华 , 等 . 人工听觉脑干植入在先天性耳聋低龄儿童中的应用探索 [J ] . 上海交通大学学报:医学版 , 2020 , 40 ( 10 ): 1324 - 1329 .

Glaubitz C , Liebscher T , Hoppe U . Age-related language performance and device use in children with very early bilateral cochlear implantation [J ] . International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology , 2021 , 147 ( 8 ): 110 - 118 .

朱建光 , 白云冬 , 马瑞颖 , 等 . 单侧人工耳蜗植入对学龄前耳聋儿童听觉言语康复的效果影响因素分析 [J ] . 现代生物医学进展 , 2019 , 19 ( 21 ): 4112 - 4115 .

李玲 . 语前聋患儿一侧人工耳蜗植入对侧配戴助听器聆听效果分析 [D ] . 郑州 : 郑州大学 .

王永华 . 儿童助听器验配应注意的风险 [J ] . 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 , 2014 , 12 ( 4 ): 241 - 244 .

黄治物 , 陈建勇 , 李蕴 , 等 . 婴幼儿助听器验配 [J ] . 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 , 2012 , 10 ( 3 ): 170 - 174 .

杨烨 , 高珺岩 , 钱晓云 , 等 . 低龄幼儿人工耳蜗植入后对侧耳继续配戴助听器的听力学依据 [J ] . 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志 , 2018 , 32 ( 11 ): 841 - 844 .

顾海玲 , 孔维丽 , 尹晓玲 , 等 . logistic回归联合ROC曲线评价IT-MAIS得分在预测0～36月龄婴幼儿听力损失程度中的诊断价值 [J ] . 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志 , 2022 , 36 ( 2 ): 109 - 114 .

Umat C , Chong SL , Mukari Z . Mandarin speech perception tests for Malaysian Chinese children [J ] . jurnal sains kesihatan malaysia , 2010 , 8 ( 1 ): 88 - 106 .

张娟 , 付欣 , 王兴 , 等 . 低龄儿童人工耳蜗植入术后言语感知与空间听觉能力发育特点的研究 [J ] . 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志 , 2021 , 56 ( 8 ): 812 - 818 .

赵雅雯 , 刘海红 , 李颖 , 等 . 中文版"人工耳蜗植入儿童家长观点调查问卷"的建立与信度和效度研究 [J ] . 听力学及言语疾病杂志 , 2017 , 25 ( 2 ): 137 - 142 .

王抗震 , 张盼盼 , 朱淑丰 , 等 . 对侧使用助听器对人工耳蜗听觉功能康复效果研究 [J ] . 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 , 2019 , 17 ( 3 ): 217 - 220 .

Magsi AG , Rehman MU , Soomro FA , et al . Determine the Frequency of Sensorineural Deafness in Children with Cerebral Palsy [J ] . Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences , 2021 , 15 ( 6 ): 1478 - 1481 .

徐卓 , 查定军 , 周敏 , 等 . 低龄语前聋患儿双侧人工耳蜗植入与双模式干预早期效果分析 [J ] . 听力学及言语疾病杂志 , 2022 , 30 ( 2 ): 124 - 129 .

文骏雄 , 魏薇 , 马秀岚 . IT-MAIS对双耳双模式患儿远期听觉能力康复效果评估 [J ] . 中华耳科学杂志 , 2020 , 18 ( 4 ): 643 - 647 .

孙茂钢 , 李腾 , 张恩东 , 等 . 双耳双模式语前聋患儿人工耳蜗植入术后言语识别效果meta分析 [J ] . 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 , 2020 , 18 ( 5 ): 373 - 376 .

郑琪 , 刘一迪 , 刘海红 , 等 . 双模式助听条件下人工耳蜗植入儿童言语感知效果评估 [J ] . 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 , 2020 , 18 ( 6 ): 416 - 419 .

刘一迪 , 郑琪 , 倪广健 , 等 . 双模式助听儿童的皮层听觉诱发电位特征研究 [J ] . 听力学及言语疾病杂志 , 2020 , 28 ( 5 ): 550 - 554 .

楼高忠 , 胡娟 , 史文迪 . 骨导听性脑干反应和骨导多频听觉稳态反应在传导性听力损失检测中的应用 [J ] . 中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志 , 2020 , 20 ( 4 ): 301 - 304 .

史文迪 , 陈莹 , 王永华 . 人工耳蜗与助听器的双耳双模式干预 [J ] . 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 , 2020 , 18 ( 5 ): 363 - 366 .

Views

114

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Analysis of the Effect of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation and Bimodal Stimulation in Later-implanted Patients with Prelingual Deafness

Research Landscape of Auditory Evoked Potentials in Cochlear Implants

The Effect of Family Empowerment Programs on Caregivers of Prelingually Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants

Research Advance of Children's Speech Perception Ability under Noise

Analysis of Hearing Aid Effectiveness in Patients with Age-related Hearing Loss

Related Author

ZHANG Li

ZHU Bing-bing

WANG Jian-yan

LI Li-ling

CHEN Dan

CHEN Yu-bin

TAN Jing-qian

LUO Jia

Related Institution

合肥京东方医院耳鼻喉科

中山大学附属第三医院

首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科

首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院护理部

北京语言大学语言康复学院

⁰