QU Ying,XU Ming,LIN Da-wei,et al.Application of Digital Speech Test Combined with Hearing Impairment Screening Scale to Patients with Occupational Noise Induced Hearing Loss[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(04):363-367.
QU Ying,XU Ming,LIN Da-wei,et al.Application of Digital Speech Test Combined with Hearing Impairment Screening Scale to Patients with Occupational Noise Induced Hearing Loss[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(04):363-367.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.04.008.
Application of Digital Speech Test Combined with Hearing Impairment Screening Scale to Patients with Occupational Noise Induced Hearing Loss
探究噪声下数字言语测试(digital speech test under noise,DIN)联合听力障碍筛查量表(hearing impairment screening scule,HHIA-S)在职业性噪声性听力损失患者中的应用价值。
方法
2
选择职业性噪声性听力损失患者102例作为研究组,按双耳纯音听阈平均值PTA
0.5~4 kHz
(双耳在500、1000、2000、4000 Hz纯音听阈平均值)分为轻度组(26~40 dB HL)51例、中度组(41~60 dB HL)27例、重度组(61~80 dB HL)24例;另选取听力正常健康体检者90例作为对照组。全部行纯音听阈测试、声导抗测试、DIN及HHIA-S测试。比较各组各指标测试结果,并绘制受试者工作特性曲线(receiver operating chara cteristc curve,ROC)分析其相应的关系。
结果
2
研究组PTA
0.5~4 kHz
、DIN及HHIA-S评分均显著高于对照组高(
P
<0.05)。其中重度组PTA
0.5~4 kHz
、DIN及HHIA-S评分均比中度及轻度组高,且中度组显著高于轻度组(
P
<0.05)。Spearman相关性分析显示,DIN、HHIA-S与PTA
0.5~4 kHz
均呈显著正相关(
P
<0.05)。HHIA-S评分中除了“E7”问题外,其余9个问题均与PTA、DIN呈正相关(
P
<0.05)。DIN、HHIA-S的曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)分别为0.964、0
.948;以PTA
0.5~4 kHz
>25 dB HL作为听力损失“金标准”,提示联合测试的特异度最高,达100.00%。纯音听力测试、DIN、HHIA-S的测试时长相比有显著差异(
To explore the application of Digital Speech Test under Noise (DIN) combined with Hearing Impairment Screening Scale (HHIA-S) to patients with occupational noise induced hearing loss.
Methods
2
102 patients with occupational noise induced hearing loss were selected as the study group. According to the mean value of binaural pure tone hearing threshold PTA0.5-4 kHz
51 patients with mild hearing loss (26-40 dB HL)
27 patients with moderate hearing loss (41-60 dB HL)
and 24 patients with severe hearing loss (61-80 dB HL) were selected as the study group. Another 90 healthy people with normal hearing were selected as the control group. Pure tone hearing threshold test
acoustic immittance test
DIN and HHIA-S test were performed in all patients. The test results of each index in each group were compared
and the ROC of subjects was drawn to analyze the corresponding relationship.
Results
2
PTA
0.5-4 kHz
DIN results and HHIA-S scores in the study group were higher than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05). PTA
0.5-4 kHz
DIN results and HHIA-S scores in severe group were higher than those in moderate group and mild group
and those in moderate group were higher than those in mild group (
P
<
0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that DIN
HHIA-S and PTA
0.5-4 kHz
were positively correlated (
P
<
0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that except for the "E7" question in HHIA-S score
the other nine questions were positively correlated with PTA and DIN results (
P
<
0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of DIN and HHIA-
S was 0.964 and 0.948 respectively; PTA
0.5-4 kHz
>
25 dB HL as the "gold standard" of hearing loss
indicates that the specificity of the joint test was the highest
reaching 100.00%. There was a significant difference in the test duration among pure tone audiometry
DIN
and HHIA-S (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
The digital speech test combined with hearing impairment screening scale has high application value in patients with occupational noise induced hearing loss
and can be used as an effective supplement to pure tone hearing test screening for hearing loss.
Nieman CL , McMahon CM . The World Health Organization's World Report on Hearing: a call to action for hearing care providers [J ] . J Laryngol Otol , 2020 , 134 ( 5 ): 377 - 378 .
Motlagh Zadeh L , Silbert NH , Sternasty K , et al . Development and validation of a digits-in-noise hearing test in Persian [J ] . Int J Audiol . 2021 , 60 ( 3 ): 202 - 209 .
Qi B , Dong R , Cui J , et al . Analysis of hearing screening results in adult health check-up population [J ] . Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi , 2020 , 34 ( 11 ): 986 - 989 .
De Sousa KC , Smits C , Moore DR , et al . Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-noise Testing as a Hearing Screening and Triage Tool to Classify Type of Hearing Loss [J ] . Ear Hear , 2022 , 43 ( 3 ): 1037 - 1048 .
Potgieter JM , Swanepoel W , Myburgh HC , et al . The South African English Smartphone Digits-in-Noise Hearing Test: Effect of Age, Hearing Loss, and Speaking Competence [J ] . Ear Hear , 2018 , 39 ( 4 ): 656 - 663 .