Evaluation of the Effects of Hearing Aids in Postlingually Deaf Adults

LIANG Shuang; YIN Hong-yu; HUO Er-bing; LONG Jiang; SUN Xi-bin

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.03.006

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Evaluation of the Effects of Hearing Aids in Postlingually Deaf Adults

Clinical Research | 更新时间：2023-05-22

- Evaluation of the Effects of Hearing Aids in Postlingually Deaf Adults
- Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation Vol. 21, Issue 3, Pages: 246-248(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  中国听力语言康复研究中心北京 102209
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.03.006
  CLC：
- Published：15 May 2023，
  
  Received：26 July 2021，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
梁爽,尹鸿宇,霍二冰等.成人语后聋患者配戴助听器效果评价[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(03):246-248.

LIANG Shuang,YIN Hong-yu,HUO Er-bing,et al.Evaluation of the Effects of Hearing Aids in Postlingually Deaf Adults[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(03):246-248.
梁爽,尹鸿宇,霍二冰等.成人语后聋患者配戴助听器效果评价[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(03):246-248. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.03.006.

LIANG Shuang,YIN Hong-yu,HUO Er-bing,et al.Evaluation of the Effects of Hearing Aids in Postlingually Deaf Adults[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(03):246-248. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.03.006.

摘要

目的

评价成人语后聋患者经专业助听器使用指导前后配戴助听器的效果，为政府制定政策提供依据。

方法

追踪随访获得政府资助助听器的听力障碍患者23人（男13人，女10人），平均年龄58.5±1.1岁。采用问卷评估的方式对专业助听器使用指导前及指导2周后的效果进行评价。问卷选择助听器效果国际性问卷（international outcome inventory for hearing aids，IOI-HA）。

结果

①在给患者专业助听器使用指导前后的问卷评估中，患者对问卷中7个问题的评分具有显著差异（

=-2.86、-4.09、-2.49、-2.45、-3.27、-3.81、-3.59，

＜0.05），患者经指导后，配戴助听器效果显著提高；②指导前患者对配戴助听器效果总体评价不满意，总分仅16.17，指导后患者配戴助听器效果总体评价提高至23.74。评分间具有显著差异（

=-3.62，

＜0.05）。

结论

政府在制定助听器配发政策时，除了助听器设备本身，还应将为患者提供助听器验配相关服务列入其中。

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the levels of satisfaction of post-lingual hearing-impaired adults wearing the hearing aid. To provide the basis for the government to formulate policies.

Methods

A total of 23 hearing-impaired patients (13 males

10 females ) with an average age of 58.5±1.1 years who received government-funded hearing aids were followed up. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the effects of professional hearing aid instruction before and after 2 weeks of professional hearing aid instruction.The international outcome inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA) was selected.

Results

In the two questionnaire evaluations before and after the patients receiving the professional hearing aid use guidance

there were significant differences between the two scores of the seven questions in the questionnaire (

=-2.86

-4.09

-2.49

-2.45

-3.27

-3.81

-3.59

0.05). After the patients received the professional hearing aid use guidance

the effects of wearing hearing aid were significantly improved. Before the professional hearing aid instruction

patients were not satisfied with the overall evaluation of the effects of wearing hearing aids

and the total score was only 16.17. After the professional hearing aid instruction

the overall evaluation of the effects of wearing hearing aids increased to 23.74. There was a significant difference between the two scores (

=-3.62

0.05).

Conclusion

When formulating the policy of hearing aid distribution

the government should include the services of hearing aid fitting for patients in addition to the hearing aid equipment itself.

关键词

成人助听效果国际助听器效果评定问卷

Keywords

AdultHearing aid effectIOI-HA

references

Brewster K, Wall M, Stein A, et al. Age-related hearing loss, late-life depression, and risk for incident dementia in older adults [J].The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,2020,28(4): s90-s93.

Pronk M, Deeg DJH, Versfeld NJ, et al. Predictors of Entering a Hearing Aid Evaluation Period: A Prospective Study in Older Hearing-Help Seekers[J]. Trends Hear,2017,21: 1-20.

Chia EM, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, et al. Hearing impairment and health-related quality of life: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study [J].Ear Hear,2007,28(2):187-195.

Mulrow CD, Tuley MR, Aguilar C. Sustained benefits of hearing aids[J]. Speech Hear Res,1992,35(6):1402-1405.

世界卫生组织盲聋预防处. 发展中国家助听器及其服务指南(第二版)[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2005, 13(1): 5-34.

Liu H, Zhang H, Liu S, et al. International outcome inventory for hearing aids.(IOI-HA): Results from the Chinese version[J]. International Journal of Audiology, 2011, 50(10): 673-678.

张华, 王硕, 陈静, 等.助听器效果评估调查问卷的初步应用[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2008,15(2):83-86.

孔颖, 张华, 刘海红, 等. 助听器效果国际性调查问卷在助听器效果评估中的应用[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2010, 18(6): 67-70.

梁爽, 王丽燕, 叶小静, 等. 老年聋患者远程验配助听器效果分析[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志, 2016, 14(6): 421-424.

郗昕. 助听器参数调配的六步工作法[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2014,12(4):255-256.

Kozlowski L, Almeida G, Ribas A. Level of user satisfaction with hearing AIDS and environment: the international outcome inventory for hearing AIDS[J]. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2014,18(3):229-234.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰