A Review on the Objective Evaluation of Hearing Aid Benefits with Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential

GAO Qi; HUANG Li-na; CHEN Fei

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.02.007

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

A Review on the Objective Evaluation of Hearing Aid Benefits with Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential

Clinical Application and Remote Fitting of Hearing Aid | 更新时间：2023-05-22

- A Review on the Objective Evaluation of Hearing Aid Benefits with Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential
- Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation Vol. 21, Issue 2, Pages: 138-143(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.香港大学教育学院沟通、发展与信息科学学部言语及听力科学分部香港 999077
  2.南方科技大学工学院电子与电气工程系语音与生理信号处理实验室深圳 518055
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.02.007
  CLC：
- Published：15 March 2023，
  
  Received：21 October 2022，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
高琪,黄丽娜,陈霏.皮层听觉诱发电位客观评估助听效果的综述[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(02):138-143.

GAO Qi,HUANG Li-na,CHEN Fei.A Review on the Objective Evaluation of Hearing Aid Benefits with Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(02):138-143.
高琪,黄丽娜,陈霏.皮层听觉诱发电位客观评估助听效果的综述[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2023,21(02):138-143. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.02.007.

GAO Qi,HUANG Li-na,CHEN Fei.A Review on the Objective Evaluation of Hearing Aid Benefits with Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2023,21(02):138-143. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2023.02.007.

摘要

助听器效果验证是选配流程中的重要一环。受年龄、认知、多残、语言背景等因素影响，部分患者无法配合行为学言语测听。因此，开发客观的助听器助听效果评估工具具有重要的临床意义。皮层听觉诱发电位（cortical auditory evoked potential，CAEP）作为一种电生理测试，因其客观性、可在清醒状态下测试、可使用言语刺激以及与行为学听阈的良好一致性，适用于以上群体的助听效果评估。本文从助听器用户的言语觉察和识别能力，以及激活助听器技术，如非线性频率压缩、降噪算法等影响入手，介绍CAEP相关主题的研究基础和现状。尽管CAEP有潜力表征助听后言语觉察和识别能力以及助听器新技术的影响，但距离其临床应用仍需大量研究。

Abstract

Hearing aid verification plays an important role in the fitting process. Some hearing-impaired patients are unable to cooperate with behavioural speech tests due to factors such as age

cognitive impairment

other disabilities

and language experience. Therefore

it is of clinical significance to consider an objective tool to evaluate hearing aid benefits. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential (CAEP) is an alternative means of evaluating hearing aid benefits in such populations because of its objectivity

testability in the awake state

use of speech stimuli

and good consistency with behavioural hearing thresholds. This paper introduces the progress and advancements of research in using CAEP to evaluate speech detection and recognition of hearing aid users

as well as the influence of hearing aid technologies on such as nonlinear frequency compression and noise reduction algorithm. Although CAEP has the potential to index aided speech detection and recognition abilities

and the influence of hearing aid technologies

there is still a long way towards using it as a clinical routine.

关键词

皮层听觉诱发电位助听器言语觉察言语识别

Keywords

Cortical auditory evoked potentialHearing aidSpeech detectionSpeech recognition

references

Tsui B, Wong LL, Wong EC. Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss[J]. Int J Audiol,2002, 41(6):330-333.

Yeung KN, Wong LL. Prediction of hearing thresholds: comparison of cortical evoked response audiometry and auditory steady state response audiometry techniques[J]. Int J Audiol, 2007, 46:17-25.

Baydan M, Batuk MO, Sennaroglu G. Relationship between aided cortical auditory evoked responses and aided behavioral thresholds[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2019,125:98-102.

Gilley PM, Sharma A, Dorman M, et al. Developmental changes in refractoriness of the cortical auditory evoked potential[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2005,116(3):648-657.

Martin BA, Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, event-related potentials in response to periodic and aperiodic stimuli with the same spectral envelope[J]. Ear Hear, 1999,20(1):33-44.

Korczak PA, Kurtzberg D, Stapells DR. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing[J]. Ear Hear, 2005,26(2):165-185.

Tremblay KL, Friesen L, Martin BA, et al. Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds[J]. Ear Hear, 2003,24(3):225-232.

Tremblay KL, Billings CJ, Friesen LM, et al. Neural representation of amplified speech sounds[J]. Ear Hear, 2006,27(2):93-103.

Tremblay KL, Kalstein L, Billings CJ, et al. The neural representation of consonant-vowel transitions in adults who wear hearing AIDS[J]. Trends Amplif, 2006,10(3):155-162.

Chang HW, Dillon H, Carter L, et al. The relationship between cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) detection and estimated audibility in infants with sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Int J Audiol, 2012,51(9):663-670.

Zhang VW, Ching TY, Van Buynder P, et al. Aided cortical response, speech intelligibility, consonant perception and functional performance of young children using conventional amplification or nonlinear frequency compression[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2014,78(10):1692-1700.

Ching TY, Zhang VW, Hou S, et al. Cortical auditory evoked potentials reveal changes in audibility with nonlinear frequency compression in hearing aids for children: Clinical implications[J]. Semin Hear, 2016,37(1):25-35.

Durante AS, Wieselberg MB, Carvalho S, et al. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential: evaluation of speech detection in adult hearing aid users[J]. Codas, 2014,26(5):367-373.

Carter L, Dillon H, Seymour J, et al. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli[J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 2013,24(9):807-822.

Kim HJ, Lee JH, Shim HJ. Effect of digital noise reduction of hearing aids on music and speech perception[J]. J Audiol Otol, 2020,24(4):180-190.

Bruno R, Freni F, Portelli D, et al. Frequency-lowering processing to improve speech-in-noise intelligibility in patients with age-related hearing loss[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2021,278(10):3697-3706.

Golding M, Pearce W, Seymour J, et al. The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and functional measures in young infants[J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 2007,18(2):117-125.

Van Dun B, Carter L, Dillon H. Sensitivity of cortical auditory evoked potential detection for hearing-impaired infants in response to short speech sounds[J]. Audiol Res, 2012,62(1):e13.

Carter L, Golding M, Dillon H, et al. The detection of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using statistical and visual detection techniques[J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 2010,21(5):347-356.

Golding M, Dillon H, Seymour J, et al. The detection of adult cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) using an automated statistic and visual detection[J]. Int J Audiol, 2009,48(12):833-842.

郭倩倩,陈雪清,莫玲燕,等.皮层听觉诱发电位评估耳聋儿童助听器验配效果的意义[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2016,24(01):62-66.

Parbery-Clark A, Marmel F, Bair J, et al. What subcortical-cortical relationships tell us about processing speech in noise[J]. Eur J Neurosci, 2011,33(3):549-557.

Billings CJ, McMillan GP, Penman TM, et al. Predicting perception in noise using cortical auditory evoked potentials[J]. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2013,14(6):891-903.

Billings CJ, Penman TM, McMillan GP, et al. Electrophysiology and perception of speech in noise in older listeners: effects of hearing impairment and age[J]. Ear Hear, 2015,36(6):710-722.

Rance G, Cone-Wesson B, Wunderlich J, et al. Speech perception and cortical event related potentials in children with auditory neuropathy[J]. Ear Hear, 2002,23(3):239-253.

De Siati RD, Rosenzweig F, Gersdorff G, et al. Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders: from diagnosis to treatment: literature review and case reports[J]. J Clin Med, 2020,9(4):1074.

Sohier H, Bardy F, Ching TYC. Relationship between objective measures of hearing discrimination elicited by non-linguistic stimuli and speech perception in adults[J]. Sci Rep, 2021,11(1):19554.

孙晋,牟宏宇,沈志豪,等.听力损失老年人配戴助听器前后皮层听觉诱发电位与言语感知的研究[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2022,30(01):11-16.

Glista D, Easwar V, Purcell DW, et al. A Pilot Study on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Children: Aided CAEPs Reflect Improved high-frequency audibility with frequency compression hearing aid technology[J]. Int J Otolaryngol, 2012,20(18):982-984.

Simpson A. Frequency-lowering devices for managing high-frequency hearing loss: a review[J]. Trends Amplif, 2009,13(2):87-106.

Kirby BJ, Brown CJ. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on acc amplitude and listener performance[J]. Ear Hear, 2015,36(5):e261-70.

Slugocki C, Kuk F, Korhonen P. Effects of directional microphone and noise reduction on subcortical and cortical auditory-evoked potentials in older listeners with hearing loss[J]. Ear Hear, 2020,41(5):1282-1293.

Billings CJ, Tremblay KL, Stecker GC, et al. Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level[J]. Hear Res, 2009,254(1-2):15-24.

Billings CJ, Tremblay KL, Miller CW. Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes in hearing aid gain[J]. Int J Audiol, 2011,50(7):459-467.

Billings CJ, Papesh MA, Penman TM, et al. Clinical use of aided cortical auditory evoked potentials as a measure of physiological detection or physiological discrimination[J]. Int J Otolaryngol, 2012,2012:365752-365765.

Van Dun B, Kania A, Dillon H. Cortical Auditory Evoked potentials in (un)aided normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults[J]. Semin Hear, 2016,37(1):9-24.

Easwar V, Glista D, Purcell DW, et al. The effect of stimulus choice on cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP): consideration of speech segment positioning within naturally produced speech[J]. Int J Audiol, 2012,51(12):926-931.

Easwar V, Purcell DW, Scollie SD. Electroacoustic comparison of hearing aid output of phonemes in running speech versus isolation: Implications for Aided Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Testing[J]. Int J Otolaryngol, 2012,16(5):518-522.

Golding M, Purdy SC, Sharma M, et al. The effect of stimulus duration and inter-stimulus interval on cortical responses in infants[J]. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology, 2006, 28(2):122-136.

Views

154

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Evaluation of Rehabilitation Outcomes after Cochlear Implantation in Later-Implanted Patients with Prelingual Deafness

The Effectiveness of Domestic ally Made Hearing Aids for Initial Fitting in Middle-Aged and Elderly Hearing-Impaired Patients

Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Children with Cochlear Implants in Relation to Auditory Speech Performance

A Case of Long Term Follow up of Cochlear Implantation Sided Deafness Patients

Related Author

HUANG Li-na

CHEN Fei

GAO Qi

SONG Qi

XIAO Shu-fen

GE Shi-bo

LI Zhen

DI Bin

Related Institution

香港大学教育学院沟通、发展与信息科学学部，言语及听力科学分部

南方科技大学工学院电子与电气工程系，语音与生理信号处理实验室

解放军第九八〇医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科

中国听力语言康复研究中心

北京科弘悦医疗器械有限公司

⁰