汉语孤独症儿童对投射性方位词的理解

陈唯可; 吴西愉

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2025.01.021

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

汉语孤独症儿童对投射性方位词的理解

康复教育 | 更新时间：2026-07-11

- 汉语孤独症儿童对投射性方位词的理解
- The Understanding of Projective Spatial Terms in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism
- 中国听力语言康复科学杂志 2025年23卷第1期页码：87-91
- 作者机构：
  
  1.北京大学外国语学院北京 100871
  2.北京大学语言学实验室/北京大学中国语言文学系北京 100871
- 作者简介：
  
  陈唯可硕士研究生；研究方向：外国语言学及应用语言学
  吴西愉，E-mail：xiyuwu@pku.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2025.01.021
  中图分类号： G762
- 收稿：2024-03-27，
  
  纸质出版：2025-01-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
陈唯可,吴西愉.汉语孤独症儿童对投射性方位词的理解[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2025,23(01):87-91.

CHEN Wei-ke,WU Xi-yu.The Understanding of Projective Spatial Terms in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2025,23(01):87-91.
陈唯可,吴西愉.汉语孤独症儿童对投射性方位词的理解[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2025,23(01):87-91. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2025.01.021.

CHEN Wei-ke,WU Xi-yu.The Understanding of Projective Spatial Terms in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2025,23(01):87-91. DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2025.01.021.

摘要

目的

探讨汉语孤独症儿童对投射性方位词（前、后、左、右）的理解能力，进一步探讨心智理论能力与空间观点采择之间的关系。

方法

选择典型发展儿童和孤独症儿童各1组作为被试，根据实验指令，被试将物体放置在刺激物的前、后、左、右位置。分析被试的正确率和影响因素，如心理旋转角度、心智理论能力、刺激物有生性等，评估其对投射性方位词的理解。

结果

孤独症儿童对投射性方位词的理解能力显著低于典型发展儿童。在涉及左右判断任务中，孤独症儿童的正确率与心理旋转所需的角度显著相关。这种理解能力与心智理论能力、被放置物体与刺激物的相对位置、刺激物的有生性以及指令中方位词与名词的结构关系均未表现出显著相关性。

结论

汉语孤独症儿童在理解投射性方位词时存在显著困难，特别是在涉及复杂心理旋转任务中。这可能与孤独症儿童在空间观点采择能力上的缺陷有关，但与心智理论能力等其他因素的直接关联性尚未得到证实。

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to explore the understanding of projective spatial terms (front

back

left and right) in Mandarin-speaking children with autism and further examine the relationship between Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities and spatial perspective taking.

Method

The experiment involved two groups of participants: typically developing children and children with autism. Participants were instructed to place objects in the positions of front

back

left or right of a reference object based on given directives. The study assessed their understanding of projective spatial terms by analyzing accuracy and related factors such as mental rotation angles

Theory of Mind abilities

and the animacy of reference objects

Results

The results revealed that children with autism demonstrated significantly lower comprehension of projective spatial terms compared to typically developing children.For tasks involving left-right judgments

the accuracy of children with autism was significantly correlated with the angle required for mental rotation. However

no significant correlations were found between their comprehension ability and factors

such as Theory of Mind abilities

the relative position of the objects

the animacy of the reference objects

or the structural relationship between spatial terms and nouns in the instructions.

Conclusion

The study indicates that Mandarin-speaking children with autism face notable challenges in understanding projective spatial terms

especially in tasks requiring complex mental rotation. These difficulties may be attributed to deficits in spective taking rather than direct links to Theory of Mind abilities or other factors examined.

关键词

Keywords

references

Jones CR , Simonoff E , Baird G , et al . The association between theory of mind, executive function, and the symptoms of autism spectrum disorder [J ] . Autism Research , 2018 , 11 ( 1 ): 95 - 109 .

Senju A . Spontaneous theory of mind and its absence in autism spectrum disorders [J ] . The Neuroscientist , 2012 , 18 ( 2 ): 108 - 113 .

Baron-Cohen S . Theory of mind and autism: A review [J ] . International review of research in mental retardation , 2000 , 23 : 169 - 184 .

Vander Heyden KM , Huizinga M , Raijmakers ME , et al . Children's representations of another person's spatial perspective: Different strategies for different viewpoints? [J ] . Journal of experimental child psychology , 2017 , 153 ( 1 ): 57 - 73 .

Kessler K , Wang H . Spatial perspective taking is an embodied process, but not for everyone in the same way: differences predicted by sex and social skills score [J ] . Spatial Cognition & Computation , 2012 , 12 ( 2-3 ): 133 - 158 .

Shield A , Pyers J , Martin A , et al . Relations between language and cognition in native‐signing children with autism spectrum disorder [J ] . Autism Research , 2016 , 9 ( 12 ): 1304 - 1315 .

Bochynska A , Coventry KR , Vulchanov V , et al . Tell me where it is: Selective difficulties in spatial language on the autism spectrum [J ] . Autism , 2020 , 24 ( 7 ): 1740 - 1757 .

Cardillo R , Erbì C , Mammarella IC . Spatial perspective-taking in children with autism spectrum disorders: the predictive role of visuospatial and motor abilities [J ] . Frontiers in human neuroscience , 2020 , 14 : 208 - 208 .

朱德熙 . 语法讲义 [M ] . 北京 : 商务印书馆 , 1982 . 40 .

Levinson SC . Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity (Vol. 5) [M ] . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press , 2003 . 24 - 56 .

方经民 . 汉语“左”“右”方位参照中的主视和客视——兼与游顺钊先生讨论 [J ] . 语言教学与研究 , 1987 , 9 ( 3 ): 52 - 60,154 .

郭锐 . 方位词“前、后、左、右”的参照策略 [J ] . 中国语言学论丛 , 2004 , 3 : 1 - 30 .

刘宁生 . 汉语怎样表达物体的空间关系 [J ] . 中国语文 , 1994 , 74 ( 3 ): 169 - 179 .

Kessler K , Thomson LA . The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference [J ] . Cognition , 2010 , 114 ( 1 ): 72 - 88 .

Newcombe N . The development of spatial perspective taking [J ] . Advances in child development and behavior , 1989 , 22 ( 2 ): 203 - 247 .

Yu AB , Zacks JM . The role of animacy in spatial transformations [J ] . Memory & Cognition , 2010 , 38 ( 7 ): 982 - 993 .

Hutchins TL , Prelock PA , Chace W . Test-retest reliability of a theory of mind task battery for children with autism spectrum disorders [J ] . Focus on autism and other developmental disabilities , 2008 , 23 ( 4 ): 195 - 206 .

Gzesh SM , Surber CF . Visual perspective-taking skills in children [J ] . Child development , 1985 , 56 ( 5 ): 1204 - 1213 .

Surtees A , Apperly I , Samson D . Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes [J ] . Cognition , 2013 , 129 ( 2 ): 426 - 438 .

Kessler K , Thomson LA . The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference [J ] . Cognition , 2010 , 114 ( 1 ): 72 - 88 .

Kessler K , Biermann-Ruben K , Jonas M , et al . Investigating the human mirror neuron system by means of cortical synchronization during the imitation of biological movements [J ] . Neuroimage , 2006 , 33 ( 1 ): 227 - 238 .

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

孤独症行为干预技术的发展——从高结构化教学范式到自然教学策略范式

家长介导的孤独症儿童语言能力干预实证研究综述

100动词任务训练对脑卒中后运动性失语命名功能的疗效观察

年龄相关性听力损失疾病负担的多因素分析

年龄相关性听力损失患者配戴助听器效果分析