浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.西安交通大学医学院第一附属医院 西安 710061
2.西安市中心医院 西安 710021
朱云 本科 副主任医师;研究方向:耳鼻咽喉头颈外科疾病、嗓音疾病
巩晓宏,E-mail:woshigxh@163.con
纸质出版日期:2024-01-15,
收稿日期:2021-12-16,
移动端阅览
朱云,韩鹏,张少强等.基于构音训练的语言康复训练对听障儿童听觉言语能力及智力发育的影响[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(01):87-90.
ZHU Yun,HAN Peng,ZHANG Shao-qiang,et al.Effects of Speech Rehabilitation Training Based on Articulation Training on Hearing, Speech Ability and Intelligence Development of Children with Oral Resonance Disorder[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(01):87-90.
朱云,韩鹏,张少强等.基于构音训练的语言康复训练对听障儿童听觉言语能力及智力发育的影响[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2024,22(01):87-90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.01.023.
ZHU Yun,HAN Peng,ZHANG Shao-qiang,et al.Effects of Speech Rehabilitation Training Based on Articulation Training on Hearing, Speech Ability and Intelligence Development of Children with Oral Resonance Disorder[J].Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation,2024,22(01):87-90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4933.2024.01.023.
目的
2
探讨基于构音训练的语言康复训练对听障儿童听觉言语能力及智力发育的影响。
方法
2
选择2019年2月至2021年3月本院收治的伴口腔共鸣障碍语前聋听障儿童,采用随机数字表法分为观察组(40例)及对照组(39例),两组患儿均进行常规康复干预,观察组在对照组基础上进行基于发音器官运动功能矫正训练。对比分析干预前后患儿脑干听觉诱发电位、口腔共鸣参数,采用《听障儿童听觉及语言能力评估标准及方法》及Gesell儿童发育量表对患儿听觉言语能力及智力发育情况进行评估。
结果
2
①两组患儿干预后I波、III波、V潜伏期均显著延长(
P
<
0.05),观察组I波、III波、V波潜伏期显著高于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。②两组患儿干预后共振峰/a/F
1
、/i/F
2
值显著升高,/u/F
2
值显著降低(
P
<
0.05),观察组干预后/a/F
1
、/i/F
2
值显著高于对照组(
P
<
0.05),/u/F
2
值显著低于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。③两组患儿干预前听觉能力、言语能力及Gesell量表语言行为、适应行为等维度得分比较无显著差异(
P
>
0.05),观察组干预后各项得分显著高于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
基于构音训练的语言康复训练可改善听障儿童口腔共鸣障碍,提高听觉言语能力及智力发育。
Objective
2
To explore the effects of speech rehabilitation training based on articulation training on the hearing
speech ability and intelligence development of children with oral resonance disorder.
Methods
2
Children with preverbal deafness and hearing disorder of oral resonance disorder admitted to our hospital from February 2019 to March 2021 were selected as the research objects
and were divided into the observation group (40 cases) and the control group (39 cases) by the random number table method. Both groups received routine rehabilitation intervention. The observation group received speech rehabilitation training based on articulation organ motor function correction on the basis of the control group. The brainstem auditory evoked potential was measured before and after intervention
and the oral resonance parameters were analyzed by recording equipment and software. The hearing and language competence and intelligence development of children with hearing impairment were evaluated by the Standards and Methods of Hearing and Language Competence Assessment for Children with Hearing Impairment and Gesell Child Development Scale.
Results
2
① The latency of wave I
wave III and wave V in the two groups were prolonged after intervention (
P
<
0.05)
and the latency of wave I
wave III and wave V in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05). ②After intervention
formant /a/F1 and /i/F2 values were increased and /u/F
2
values were decreased in the two groups (
P
<
0.05). After intervention
formant /a/F1 and /i/F2 values in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05)
and /u/F
2
values were lower than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05). ③There were no statistically significant differences in the scores of auditory ability
speech ability
language behavior and adaptive behavior of Gesell scale between the two groups before intervention (
P
>
0.05)
and the scores of each item in the observation group were higher than those in the control group after intervention (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Speech rehabilitation training can improve the hearing-impaired children's oral resonance disorders
and improve their listening and speech ability and intelligence development.
构音训练听障儿童口腔共鸣障碍听觉言语能力智力发育
Articulation trainingHearing-impaired childrenOral resonance disorderAuditory and language abilityIntelligence development
Maiolo FD,Painelli A.Dynamical disorder and resonance energy transfer: a novel quantum-classical approach[J]. Phys Chem , 2020, 22(5):552-557.
周浩,熊才运,刘烨,等. 515例言语语言障碍患儿病因分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2019,27(5):5-5.
Soleimani R,Jalali MM,Faghih HA.Comparing the prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in hearing-impaired children with normal-hearing peers[J].Arch Pédiatr,2020,27(8):432-435.
李海,张婷,刘昊,等.不同音色言语训练对人工耳蜗植入儿童言语康复的效果分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2020,28(5):4-4.
Ni G,Zheng Q,Liu Y,et al.Objective electroencephalography-based assessment for auditory rehabilitation of pediatric cochlear implant users[J].Hearing Res,2021,404(4):108211.
张颖文,肖永涛,郑惠萍.痉挛型脑瘫儿童与正常儿童口腔共鸣特征比较[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2016,24(4):3-3.
吴萍,田鸿,胡文广,等. 脑瘫儿童构音障碍检查量表的制定和评估[J]. 四川医学,2012,33(7):1143-1146.
孙喜斌.听力障碍儿童听觉、语言能力评估标准及方法[M].北京:三辰影库电子音像出版社,2009.552-554.
姜丽娜,李明,边旸. Gesell 问卷用于评价小儿神经发育的信度及效度分析[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2015,14(13):1133-1135.
Torppa R,Huotilainen M.Why and how music can be used to rehabilitate and develop speech and language skills in hearing-impaired children[J]. Hearing Res, 2019, 38(10):441-447.
郑惠萍,肖永涛.后位聚焦口腔共鸣障碍对听障儿童嗓音的影响[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2017, 25(3):3-3.
王涛,徐丽娜,李峰.功能性构音障碍患者侧化构音特点分析及语音训练疗效观察[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2020, 42(1):4-4.
Hahn S,Lee YH, Hong SL, et al.The Utility of Modified Dixon Turbo Spin Echo Shoulder Magnetic Resonance Arthrography in Assessing Rotator Cuff Disorder and Evaluating the Rotator Cuff Muscles[J]. Acad Radiol, 2020, 28(2):451-457.
闵志云,李峰,徐丽娜,等.强化口部肌肉训练对功能性构音障碍患儿语音清晰度的影响[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志,2018,26(1):8-11.
Nicastri M,Giallini I,Amicucci M,et al.Variables influencing executive functioning in preschool hearing-impaired children implanted within 24 months of age: an observational cohort study[J]. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol, 2020, 4(11):1-11.
宫晶,史明旭,赵敏.语言训练结合游戏训练对听障儿童听觉言语能力的影响[J]. 中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2020,18(6):4-4.
0
浏览量
142
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构